journal article·2009-05

Gaussian Process Time Series Model for Life Prognosis of Metallic Structures

Subhasish Mohanty, Santanu Das, Aditi Chattopadhyay, Pedro Peralta

Publisher page

Abstract

Al 2024-T351 fatigue specimens have been modeled using a kernel-based multi-variate Gaussian Process approach. The Gaussian Process model projects fatigue affecting input variables to output crack growth by probabilistically inferring the underlying nonlinear relationship between input and output. The Gaussian Process approach not only explicitly models the uncertainty due to scatter in material microstructure parameter but it also implicitly models the loading sequence effect due to variable loading. The loading sequence effect is modeled through the Gaussian Process optimal hyperparameters by using the crack length data observed over the entire domain of spectrum loading. The performance in the crack growth prediction is evaluated for two covariance functions, a radial basis-based, anisotropic, covariance function and a neural network-based isotropic covariance function. Furthermore, the performance of different types of scaling, used to scale the input—output data space, is tested. It is found that for the radial basis-based anisotropic covariance function with normalized scaling, the prediction error is consistently lower compared to other combinations. In addition, the Gaussian Process model allows determination of the collapse load condition, which is a desirable feature for the online health monitoring and prognosis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ-85287, USA,

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ-85287, USA

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0013-7944(86)90217-110.1016/0013-7944(86)90217-1 ↗
2. 10.1016/0013-7944(70)90028-710.1016/0013-7944(70)90028-7 ↗
3. Gibbs, M.N. · 1997
4. Harter, J.A. · 1999
5. 10.2355/isijinternational.36.137310.2355/isijinternational.36.1373 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.09.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.09.009 ↗
7. 10.1162/neco.1992.4.3.41510.1162/neco.1992.4.3.415 ↗
8. MacKay, D.J.C. 1993. ``Hyperparameters: Optimize or Integrate Out?'' In: Heidbreder, G. and Barbara, S. (eds), Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods , pp.43-60, Kluwer, Dordrecht .10.1007/978-94-015-8729-7_2 ↗
9. MacKay, D.J.C. · Neural Networks and Machine Learning · 1998 · 168 · 133
10. Miner, M.A. · Journal of Applied Mechanics · 1945 · 1210.1115/1.4009458 ↗
11. Neal, R.M. · 1993
12. 10.1007/978-1-4612-0745-010.1007/978-1-4612-0745-0 ↗
13. Newman Jr, J.C. · ASTM STP · 1982 · 761 · 255
14. 10.1007/BF0002075110.1007/BF00020751 ↗
15. Newman Jr, J.C. · 1992
16. Rasmussen, C. · 2006
17. 10.1016/S0307-904X(01)00026-910.1016/S0307-904X(01)00026-9 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0307-904X(01)00027-010.1016/S0307-904X(01)00027-0 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.10.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.10.008 ↗
20. 10.2514/3.1031110.2514/3.10311 ↗
21. Srivastava, A.N. · Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part C: Applications and Reviews · 2008
22. Suresh, S. · 1991
23. Williams C.K.I. · 1997