Initial Thoughts on Weight Penalty Effects in Shape-adaptable Systems
Source abstract
Abstract
If a structural system has to be subjected to high loads and large geometry changes, according to the state of the art, articulated systems with discrete actuators are used, with the articulated systems consisting of stiff members connected by hinges. As an alternative, smart structures technologies can supply solutions based on the deliberate use of structural flexibility and on distributed actuation. In order to assess the advantages, which can be expected from such solutions, a thorough comparison must be made between the properties of compliant mechanisms and the conventional ones. A crucial aspect of this comparison, on which this contribution is focused, is the impact on the system’s structural weight. The first part of the paper deals with the relevance of weight penalty effects in shape-adaptable systems, with a special focus on airfoil shape control. A quantitative analysis of weight penalty effects in pin-jointed articulated structures follows. The criterion on which this analysis is based allows a characterization of general validity, not restricted to a particular example, and can be applied to other mechanisms or hinge architectures, providing a sound way of assessing the lightweight potential of a given concept and allowing a consistent comparison between different design philosophies. An extension to weight penalty effects in compliant systems shows a higher degree of complexity and could not be addressed in the same detail in this study. Anyway, some peculiar aspects are discussed in the final part of the paper, which can serve as a basis for future developments in this sense. In particular, the dependence of weight penalty effects on the system’s range of motion as well as on the load-dependence of the mechanism’s kinematics is addressed. Even if the presented results can be of direct significance to the designer of conventional articulated mechanisms, the primary relevance of this work is to be seen in the long term. Its main target is to provide a basis for the analysis of the potential offered by the compliant mechanisms and smart materials for the realization of light shape-adaptable structures and to give an impulse to research efforts aiming at developing suitable optimization procedures as well as formulating proper design rules for such kind of systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Piezoelectric Actuators and Control · Topology Optimization in Engineering · Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
German Aerospace Center (DLR), Lilienthalplatz 7, D 38108 Braunschweig, Germany,
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Antoni, U. 1928. “Flugzeugtragfläche mit veränderbarer Wölbung und auf elastischen Rippen ruhender Bespannung” (in German), German Patent No. 464373.
2. Ash, G.J. · 1979
3. Bögelsack, G. · 47
4. Berry, P. · 2000
5. 10.1106/6H4B-HBW3-VDJ8-NB8A10.1106/6H4B-HBW3-VDJ8-NB8A ↗
6. Campanile, L.F. · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · 2004 · 28
7. Cole, J.B. · 1981
8. Cole, J.B. · 1985
9. Eppler, R. 1979. “Vorrichtung zur Lagerung von Rudern und Wölbungsklappen von Flugzeugen und Wasserfahrzeugen,” (in German), German Patent Application No. 27 55 442 A1.
10. Frocht, M.M. · Journal of Applied Mechanics · 1940 · 7 · A510.1115/1.4008987 ↗
11. Grant, C.H. · 1935
12. Hötter, U. 1966. “Probleme der Krafteinleitung in Glasfaser-Kunststoff-Bauteile” (in German), Kunsstoffe , 56(12):843-846.
13. Hill, G.T.R. · 1
14. Kota, S. · Proc. SPIE · 2003 · 5054 · 2410.1117/12.483869 ↗
15. Lee, N. · 1977
16. Lilienthal, O. · 1911
17. Lyon, D.G. · 1965
18. McKinney, M. · 1977
19. McKinney, M. · 1982
20. Monner, H.P. · Proc. SPIE · 1998 · 3326 · 6010.1117/12.310673 ↗
21. Moon, Y.-M.
22. Parmele, W.R. · 1931
23. Paros, J.M. · Machine Design · 1965 · 151
24. 10.2514/3.4667710.2514/3.46677 ↗
25. Pierce, D. · 1978
26. Powers, S.G.
27. Rocheville, H.D. · 1932
28. Rowarth, R. · 1981
29. Schmidt, O. 1895. “Steuerapparat für Flugmaschinen” (in German), German Patent No. 84532.
30. Sevak, N.M. · 1974
31. Sharrock, B. 1981. “Tragflügel mit veranderbarer Wölbung” (in German), German Patent Application No. 30 39 121 A1.
32. Statkus, F.D. · 1982
33. Varioplane Company, 1923. “Tragfläche für Flugzeuge” (in German), German Patent No. 366693.
34. Wlezien, R.W. · Proc. SPIE, Vol · 1998 · 3326 · 17610.1117/12.310633 ↗
35. Wright, O. · 1920
36. Wuest, W. 1950. “Blattfedergelenke für Messgeräte” (in German), Feinwerktechnik, 54(7):167-170.