Topology Optimization of Smart Structures Using a Homogenization Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Engineers are often required to design mechanical structures to meet specific loading conditions. Topology optimization automates the process of finding an optimal structural design, allowing for size, shape, and topology variations. For a given set of boundary conditions and design specifications, an optimal structure is computed, based on a formulated cost function. In this paper, the optimization considers not only the distribution of conventional material, but also simultaneously the distribution of active piezoelectric material within the domain. In the formulation of the topology optimization problem, a microstructure consisting of smart as well as conventional material is used. Instances of the microstructure occur in a rectangular grid and cover the design domain. Since the microstructure is defined parametrically, the density of each material can be controlled individually at each point. This enables us to formulate the problem of finding an optimal material distribution as a parameter optimization problem. A homogenization approach is used to find and use effective material properties for the limiting case of an infinitely small microstructure. Several numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the application of the method to find structures that maximize the deflection at a point when the piezoelectric material is activated.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Topology Optimization in Engineering · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering — Engineering Mechanics, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering — Engineering Mechanics, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA,
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Bathe, K.-J. · 1982
2. 10.1007/BF0165094910.1007/BF01650949 ↗
3. Bensoussan, A. · 1978
4. 10.1002/cnm.64610.1002/cnm.646 ↗
5. Chattopadhyay, A. · Smart Materials and Structures · 1999 · 190 · 6605
6. 10.1002/nme.27110.1002/nme.271 ↗
7. 10.1117/12.48273610.1117/12.482736 ↗
8. 10.1109/87.93097710.1109/87.930977 ↗
9. 10.1177/1045389X920030010910.1177/1045389X9200300109 ↗
10. Francu, J. · Aplikace Matematiky, Oslo · 1982 · 27 · 96
11. Frecker, M. · 112
12. 10.1007/BF0120700310.1007/BF01207003 ↗
13. 10.1002/nme.10510.1002/nme.105 ↗
14. Gabbert, U. · 13
15. 10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-210.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2 ↗
16. Maugin, G. · International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics in Materials · 1991 · 14 · 135
17. 10.1016/0045-7825(93)90182-W10.1016/0045-7825(93)90182-W ↗
18. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980615)42:3<535::AID-NME372>3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980615)42:3<535::AID-NME372>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
19. Padula, S. and Kincaid, R. 1999. Optimization strategies for sensor and actuator placement. Natl. Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley Res. Center, Langley, Virgina, 23681 , pp. 1-12.
20. 10.1080/0890545970894541510.1080/08905459708945415 ↗
21. 10.1007/s00158005017610.1007/s001580050176 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00252-310.1016/S0045-7825(01)00252-3 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0022-5096(96)00114-710.1016/S0022-5096(96)00114-7 ↗
24. 10.1088/0964-1726/8/3/30810.1088/0964-1726/8/3/308 ↗
25. 10.1088/0964-1726/8/3/30710.1088/0964-1726/8/3/307 ↗
26. 10.1007/BF0273618310.1007/BF02736183 ↗
27. 10.1109/58.84205410.1109/58.842054 ↗
28. Weber, C.