Partially activated reconfigurable arrays to guide acoustic waves
Source abstract
Abstract
Recent studies have exemplified the potential for curved origami-inspired acoustic arrays to focus waves. Yet, reconfigurable structures that adopt curvatures are often difficult to translate to practice due to mechanical deformation of the facets that inhibit straightforward folding. In addition, not all tessellations that curve upon folding are also flat-foldable, which is a key advantage of portability inherent to many origami-inspired structures. This research introduces a new concept of partially activated reconfigurable acoustic arrays as a means to mitigate these drawbacks. Here, tessellations are studied where a subset of the facet surfaces are considered to radiate acoustic waves. The analytical results reveal focusing behaviors in such arrays that are otherwise not manifest for the array when fully activated. The focused waves are more intense in amplitude and space for partially activated arrays than fully activated counterparts. These trends are verified by experiment and are also found to be applicable to multiple reconfigurable array geometries. The results encourage broader study of the design space accessible in reconfigurable arrays to capitalize on all of the functionality afforded by origami-inspired wave guiding structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Structural Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Funding
Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/LAWP.2018.287164310.1109/LAWP.2018.2871643 ↗
2. 10.1126/sciadv.160101910.1126/sciadv.1601019 ↗
3. Balanis CA · 2016
4. 10.1109/TMECH.2017.269731010.1109/TMECH.2017.2697310 ↗
5. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.6610.1038/natrevmats.2017.66 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.503156310.1063/1.5031563 ↗
7. Boatti E · Advanced Materials · 2017 · 2910.1002/adma.201700360 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.03.00610.1016/j.ndteint.2006.03.006 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat454010.1038/nmat4540 ↗
10. 10.1109/10.8356210.1109/10.83562 ↗
11. 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.5.040202.12163010.1146/annurev.bioeng.5.040202.121630 ↗
12. 10.1109/LAWP.2012.219648910.1109/LAWP.2012.2196489 ↗
13. 10.2514/6.2014-306910.2514/6.2014-3069 ↗
14. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/8/08503110.1088/0964-1726/25/8/085031 ↗
15. 10.1038/sj.bjc.660280310.1038/sj.bjc.6602803 ↗
16. 10.1109/58.13912310.1109/58.139123 ↗
17. 10.7567/JJAP.55.07KF1910.7567/JJAP.55.07KF19 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11548-017-1545-110.1007/s11548-017-1545-1 ↗
19. 10.1038/nrc159110.1038/nrc1591 ↗
20. Kinsler LE · 2000
21. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.12.01610.1016/j.msea.2005.12.016 ↗
22. 10.1109/TAP.2015.248192210.1109/TAP.2015.2481922 ↗
23. 10.1038/srep0597910.1038/srep05979 ↗
24. 10.1002/adfm.20110297810.1002/adfm.201102978 ↗
25. 10.1126/scirobotics.aao436910.1126/scirobotics.aao4369 ↗
26. 10.1109/58.1915710.1109/58.19157 ↗
27. 10.1121/1.190654210.1121/1.1906542 ↗
28. 10.1038/ncomms1092910.1038/ncomms10929 ↗
29. 10.1118/1.192431410.1118/1.1924314 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41578-018-0009-810.1038/s41578-018-0009-8 ↗
31. 10.1201/b10971-2710.1201/b10971-27 ↗
32. 10.1073/pnas.121799811010.1073/pnas.1217998110 ↗
33. 10.2528/PIERM1709250410.2528/PIERM17092504 ↗
34. 10.1126/science.125287610.1126/science.1252876 ↗
35. Tachi T · 2010 · 458
36. 10.1109/58.54205210.1109/58.542052 ↗
37. 10.1016/B978-012753960-7/50002-410.1016/B978-012753960-7/50002-4 ↗
38. 10.1109/TAP.2017.267792010.1109/TAP.2017.2677920 ↗
39. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa6a9310.1088/1361-665X/aa6a93 ↗
40. 10.1121/1.506428110.1121/1.5064281 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2019.03.00110.1016/j.wavemoti.2019.03.001 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.9.01400910.1103/PhysRevApplied.9.014009 ↗