Effects of low cycle fatigue and inelastic buckling on the superelasticity and energy dissipation capacity of NiTi SMA rebar
Source abstract
Abstract
Superelastic NiTi Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) rebars have emerged as compelling materials for structural engineering applications in concrete bridge piers, owing to their superior superelastic and energy dissipation properties. Incorporating NiTi SMA rebars enhances structural resilience against seismic loads by enabling effective earthquake energy dissipation while minimizing structural damage. However, under tension-compression cyclic loads, NiTi SMA rebars are subjected to strain reversals, leading to buckling and potential low cycle fatigue (LCF) failure. This study investigates the LCF behavior of NiTi SMA rebars under tension-compression cyclic loading, considering various strengths, diameters, and slenderness ratios ( L / D ). The findings indicate that NiTi SMA rebars with higher slenderness ratios experience accelerated LCF failure due to buckling, leading to deteriorated mechanical properties after fewer cycles compared to rebars with lower slenderness ratios. Moreover, the study reveals that total energy dissipation and residual strain of NiTi SMA rebars are influenced by strain amplitudes and slenderness ratios. Specifically, increasing the slenderness ratio and strain amplitude results in decreased total energy dissipation and increased residual strain, underscoring the significant impact of inelastic buckling on the LCF behavior of NiTi SMA rebars. Finally, equations are presented for the prediction of energy dissipation and residual strain of NiTi SMA rebars with different slenderness ratios under tension compression cyclic loading with different strain amplitudes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Abaqus A (2011) Abaqus 6-11EF. Dassault Systems2011, Simulia. Providence, RI: Dassault Systèmes.
2. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11211410.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112114 ↗
3. 10.1088/1361-665X/aba53a10.1088/1361-665X/aba53a ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11845010.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118450 ↗
5. 10.1109/THMS.2020.304759710.1109/THMS.2020.3047597 ↗
6. 10.5459/bnzsee.50.4.504-51610.5459/bnzsee.50.4.504-516 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.01810.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.018 ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(38)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(38) ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:9(1139)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:9(1139) ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:10(1253)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:10(1253) ↗
11. 10.1002/eqe.294410.1002/eqe.2944 ↗
12. El-Bahy A, Kunnath SK, Stone WC, et al. (1999) Cumulative seismic damage of circular bridge columns: Benchmark and low-cycle fatigue tests. ACI Structural Journal 96: 633–641.
13. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.10681710.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106817 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.05510.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.055 ↗
15. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01452.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01452.x ↗
16. 10.1088/1361-665X/ad4d5f10.1088/1361-665X/ad4d5f ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.10210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.102 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.05110.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.051 ↗
19. 10.1680/jmacr.16.0049510.1680/jmacr.16.00495 ↗
20. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1991.tb00672.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1991.tb00672.x ↗
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(869)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(869) ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.03.01110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.03.011 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1994)6:4(453)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1994)6:4(453) ↗
24. 10.1177/1045389X23118545810.1177/1045389X231185458 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.03410.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.034 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.00310.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.003 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.08310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.083 ↗
28. 10.3389/fbuil.2020.60173610.3389/fbuil.2020.601736 ↗
29. Saiidi MS, Wang H (2006) Exploratory study of seismic response of concrete columns with shape memory alloys reinforcement. ACI Materials Journal 103(3): 436.
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000117610.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001176 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.11111610.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111116 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.19210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.192 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.10954410.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109544 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10518-020-00868-210.1007/s10518-020-00868-2 ↗
35. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/7/07501210.1088/0964-1726/25/7/075012 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.04710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.047 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11358810.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113588 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11282810.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112828 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11447510.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114475 ↗
40. Zong Z (2010) Uniaxial Material Model Incorporating Buckling for Reinforcing Bars in Concrete Structures Subjected to Seismic Loads. Davis: University of California.