journal article·2024-04

Optimized piezo-shunted metadamping towards the high-stiff high-damped metamaterial

Kamal K Bera, Souryadeep Biswas, Arnab Banerjee

Publisher page

Abstract

The phenomena of damping enhancement and higher decay coefficient are obtained by introducing a piezoelectric transducer at the resonating unit of the metamaterial. The difference between the damping ratio of the piezo-transducer controlled and that of the equivalent uncontrolled metamaterial is termed metadamping, and thereby it is used to indicate the enhancement of energy dissipation characteristics. The optimum inductance and resistance of the impregnated piezo-transducer are computed to minimize the response of the outer mass of a unit cell by implementing [Formula: see text] optimization technique. A parametric study is conducted after applying Bloch’s theorem, and the enhancement of damping over the complete Brillouin zone is determined to get a comprehension of the metadamping phenomenon. Impregnation of the piezo-transducer at the resonating unit not only enhances the normalized bandwidth more than twice but also significantly increases the damping emergence when compared to the equivalent uncontrolled metamaterial. This envisioned the promise of high-stiff, high-damped metamaterial for enhanced transient vibration control as well as wider attenuation bandgap.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Civil Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India

Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India

Funding

Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2019.10248310.1016/j.wavemoti.2019.102483 ↗
2. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/6/06500910.1088/0964-1726/25/6/065009 ↗
3. 10.1063/5.005808610.1063/5.0058086 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10545910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105459 ↗
5. 10.1115/1.404880210.1115/1.4048802 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11012-022-01482-z10.1007/s11012-022-01482-z ↗
7. 10.1115/1.402390110.1115/1.4023901 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.02.02810.1016/j.jsv.2015.02.028 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.509395610.1063/1.5093956 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10746110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107461 ↗
11. 10.1115/1.145645810.1115/1.1456458 ↗
12. 10.1016/bs.aams.2018.09.00110.1016/bs.aams.2018.09.001 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10776510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107765 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11831-018-9268-110.1007/s11831-018-9268-1 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.08.01410.1016/j.jsv.2013.08.014 ↗
16. Bera KK · Journal of Vibration and Control · 2021 · 28 · 23
17. 10.1016/j.jsv.2022.11745210.1016/j.jsv.2022.117452 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jsv.2010.01.02310.1016/j.jsv.2010.01.023 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jsv.2023.11793810.1016/j.jsv.2023.117938 ↗
20. Chatziathanasiou GM · Journal of Vibration and Control · 2021 · 28 · 21
21. 10.1016/j.jsv.2022.11722210.1016/j.jsv.2022.117222 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.12.01410.1016/j.ultras.2016.12.014 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.04810.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.048 ↗
24. 10.1115/1.402837810.1115/1.4028378 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jsv.2010.10.03110.1016/j.jsv.2010.10.031 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10728410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107284 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10704410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.107044 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.09.04710.1016/j.jsv.2012.09.047 ↗
29. Crandall SH · 2014
30. 10.1063/1.37195410.1063/1.371954 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.eml.2017.11.00210.1016/j.eml.2017.11.002 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.491900010.1063/1.4919000 ↗
33. 10.7498/aps.66.14070110.7498/aps.66.140701 ↗
34. 10.1177/1045389X2091026110.1177/1045389X20910261 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10999-021-09534-010.1007/s10999-021-09534-0 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.crhy.2016.02.00910.1016/j.crhy.2016.02.009 ↗
37. 10.1115/1.403477010.1115/1.4034770 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jsv.2022.11697710.1016/j.jsv.2022.116977 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jsv.2022.11697710.1016/j.jsv.2022.116977 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.349880610.1063/1.3498806 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.04.04110.1016/j.jsv.2013.04.041 ↗
42. 10.1115/1.402691110.1115/1.4026911 ↗
43. James HM · Theory of Servomechanisms · 1947 · 25
44. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.04410.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.044 ↗
45. 10.1177/107754631142905510.1177/1077546311429055 ↗
46. 10.1007/s00707-019-02437-410.1007/s00707-019-02437-4 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jsv.2010.04.01410.1016/j.jsv.2010.04.014 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.486163210.1063/1.4861632 ↗
49. 10.1177/1045389X1561596510.1177/1045389X15615965 ↗
50. Patro SR · Journal of Vibration and Control · 2022 · 29 · 13
51. Roberts JB · 2003
52. 10.1177/1045389X2091745610.1177/1045389X20917456 ↗
53. 10.1088/1361-6463/aab97e10.1088/1361-6463/aab97e ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jmps.2018.04.00510.1016/j.jmps.2018.04.005 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.06.00410.1016/j.jsv.2017.06.004 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.07.04510.1016/j.jsv.2017.07.045 ↗
57. 10.1002/eqe.429010030410.1002/eqe.4290100304 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10777010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107770 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jsv.2022.11678210.1016/j.jsv.2022.116782 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jsv.2020.11583710.1016/j.jsv.2020.115837 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.10380710.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.103807 ↗