journal article·2021-11

Numerical and experimental research on damage shape recognition of aluminum alloy plate based on Lamb wave

Yaogang Wu, Xing Shen, Dinghe Li

Publisher page

Abstract

The structure health monitoring (SHM) system with Lamb waves technique is studied numerically and experimentally in this paper. A damage shape recognition algorithm (DSRA) is developed for the hole on aluminum alloy plate specimen. The proposed DSRA is established based on the two arrival time difference method (2/ATDM) and Lagrangian optimization method. This method captures the damage shape by describing the coordinates of the reflection point from the piezoelectric ceramic lead zirconate titanate (PZT) transducers to the damage edge. 2/ATDM provides a way to obtain coordinate points by the arrival time which is determined by Lamb waves. And the coordinate points are optimized by the Lagrangian optimization method. A numerical model is established to simulate the proposed experiment process. Its convergence rate of mesh size and time steps is investigated, and the numerical results are verified by these of experiment. Hence, the shape recognition of damage occurring at an arbitrary position and that of irregular damage are studied by the proposed numerical and experiment methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China

College of Aeronautical Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin, China

Funding

national natural science foundation of china · fundamental research funds for the central universities

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1121/1.40053010.1121/1.400530 ↗
2. 10.20855/ijav.2019.24.1148510.20855/ijav.2019.24.11485 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11340-013-9846-y10.1007/s11340-013-9846-y ↗
4. 10.2514/1.2614110.2514/1.26141 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.08910.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.089 ↗
6. 10.1109/TIM.2019.289370110.1109/TIM.2019.2893701 ↗
7. 10.1117/12.48392610.1117/12.483926 ↗
8. 10.3390/s1909201010.3390/s19092010 ↗
9. 10.5050/KSNVN.2005.15.3.26610.5050/KSNVN.2005.15.3.266 ↗
10. 10.1109/TIP.2003.81529510.1109/TIP.2003.815295 ↗
11. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab802810.1088/1361-665X/ab8028 ↗
12. 10.2514/6.2003-156310.2514/6.2003-1563 ↗
13. 10.1121/1.128966310.1121/1.1289663 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.01.01410.1016/j.apacoust.2017.01.014 ↗
15. Mijar AR · Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization · 2004 · 28 · 113
16. 10.1016/S0963-8695(98)00045-010.1016/S0963-8695(98)00045-0 ↗
17. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/4/00910.1088/0964-1726/15/4/009 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cja.2019.02.00710.1016/j.cja.2019.02.007 ↗
19. 10.1121/1.214977510.1121/1.2149775 ↗
20. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/5/00510.1088/0964-1726/15/5/005 ↗
21. 10.1093/sysbio/45.3.38010.1093/sysbio/45.3.380 ↗
22. 10.1109/79.9121710.1109/79.91217 ↗
23. 10.1190/1.212711310.1190/1.2127113 ↗
24. 10.1007/978-1-84882-784-410.1007/978-1-84882-784-4 ↗
25. 10.1002/stc.248610.1002/stc.2486 ↗
26. 10.1364/AO.33.00526210.1364/AO.33.005262 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ultras.2007.10.00810.1016/j.ultras.2007.10.008 ↗
28. Zheng L · 2019 · 1