journal article·2017-07

A comparative analysis of different shape memory alloy actuator configurations

Paulo Cesar C Monteiro, Luciana Loureiro da Silva Monteiro, Marcelo A Savi, Theodoro Antoun Netto, Pedro MCL Pacheco, Tamara de Paiva

Publisher page

Abstract

Shape memory alloys are attractive engineering materials due to their potential application as actuators using the ability to memorize shapes through a thermomechanical loading. This article develops a numerical investigation of different shape memory alloy actuator configurations considering bias and antagonistic arrangements. Numerical simulations are carried out using the finite element method together with a constitutive model for shape memory alloys. Parametric analysis is carried out evaluating the performance of each actuator configuration based on stress and strain. Basically, four representative configurations of general actuators are treated: shape memory alloy wire, linear spring connected to a shape memory alloy wire, two elastic springs connected by a shape memory alloy wire, and two shape memory alloy wires connected by a spring.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

COPPE–Department of Ocean Engineering, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Department of Mechanical Engineering, CEFET/RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Center for Nonlinear Mechanics, COPPE–Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.14219/jada.archive.1971.020910.14219/jada.archive.1971.0209 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2004.06.00710.1016/j.mechrescom.2004.06.007 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00419-006-0010-310.1007/s00419-006-0010-3 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.06810.1016/j.msea.2004.09.068 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.sna.2016.02.02610.1016/j.sna.2016.02.026 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11661-999-0041-910.1007/s11661-999-0041-9 ↗
7. 10.1148/radiology.147.1.682874210.1148/radiology.147.1.6828742 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00098-010.1016/S0141-0296(01)00098-0 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.08.06110.1016/j.msea.2007.08.061 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00542-008-0659-310.1007/s00542-008-0659-3 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.sna.2004.02.02710.1016/j.sna.2004.02.027 ↗
12. Jansen S · 2004
13. 10.1016/0749-6419(86)90016-110.1016/0749-6419(86)90016-1 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0924-4247(01)00803-210.1016/S0924-4247(01)00803-2 ↗
15. 10.1007/s00707-015-1433-010.1007/s00707-015-1433-0 ↗
16. 10.1177/1045389X0934119910.1177/1045389X09341199 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.sna.2013.05.01610.1016/j.sna.2013.05.016 ↗
18. 10.1051/jp4:199146510.1051/jp4:1991465 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.sna.2009.12.02010.1016/j.sna.2009.12.020 ↗
20. 10.1016/0045-7825(83)90018-X10.1016/0045-7825(83)90018-X ↗
21. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/6/06501310.1088/0964-1726/21/6/065013 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.11.00610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.11.006 ↗
23. 10.1016/0001-6160(82)90011-610.1016/0001-6160(82)90011-6 ↗
24. 10.1007/s00419-005-0385-610.1007/s00419-005-0385-6 ↗
25. 10.1177/10453890276169674210.1177/104538902761696742 ↗
26. 10.1177/1045389X0708302610.1177/1045389X07083026 ↗
27. 10.5772/5014710.5772/50147 ↗
28. Strelec JK · 2002 · 4701 · 267
29. Strittmatter J · 2004
30. 10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00097-210.1016/S0141-0296(98)00097-2 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.sna.2012.05.01710.1016/j.sna.2012.05.017 ↗