On the advantage of a bistable energy harvesting oscillator under band-limited stochastic excitation
Source abstract
Abstract
Oscillation-based linear energy harvesters are often excited by random, band-limited, slowly varying forces. When the excitation bandwidth is limited such that natural frequencies of electromechanical energy harvester are not excited, linear devices lose their efficiency, and nonlinear structures with negative stiffness can be used to enhance the conversion efficiency by performing frequency up-conversion. It is shown here that nonlinear, bistable oscillators perform considerably better than their linear counterpart under band-limited excitation, in certain regions. This is contrary to commonly modeled, wideband, or white noise excitation, where nonlinear potential has no or little effect on the energy output. A sharp increase in performance is observed for band-limited random excitation along a well-defined region in the input-level and bandwidth plane. Having defined this region, the harvesting device can be adaptively tuned in order to keep the power output levels high. The results of simulated, partially analytical, and experimental studies are compared and analyzed to obtain cross-validation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dynamics Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering, Technion, Haifa, Israel
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/11/11500510.1088/0964-1726/18/11/115005 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.356052310.1063/1.3560523 ↗
3. 10.1016/0020-7462(82)90013-010.1016/0020-7462(82)90013-0 ↗
4. 10.1016/0020-7462(67)90010-810.1016/0020-7462(67)90010-8 ↗
5. Cohen N · 2010
6. Cohen N (2013) Theoretical and experimental study of double-well energy harvesters. PhD thesis, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa.
7. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.04.01110.1016/j.ymssp.2012.04.011 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jsv.2010.04.00210.1016/j.jsv.2010.04.002 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jsv.2010.12.00510.1016/j.jsv.2010.12.005 ↗
10. 10.1007/978-1-4614-5705-310.1007/978-1-4614-5705-3 ↗
11. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/2/02500910.1088/0964-1726/18/2/025009 ↗
12. 10.1002/978111999115110.1002/9781119991151 ↗
13. Erturk A, Hoffmann J, Inman D (2009) A piezomagnetoelastic structure for broadband vibration energy harvesting. Applied Physics Letters 94(25). Available at: http://link.aip.org/link/doi/10.1063/1.315981510.1063/1.3159815 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.312027910.1063/1.3120279 ↗
15. 10.1109/JMEMS.2008.92870910.1109/JMEMS.2008.928709 ↗
16. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/2/02300110.1088/0964-1726/22/2/023001 ↗
17. Hussain ZM · 2011
18. Kloeden PE · 2010
19. Kumar P · Sadhana: Academy Proceedings in Engineering Sciences · 2006 · 31 · 44510.1007/BF02716786 ↗
20. Lathi BP · 1998
21. 10.1063/1.343655310.1063/1.3436553 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jsv.2008.07.01710.1016/j.jsv.2008.07.017 ↗
23. 10.1007/978-0-387-76464-110.1007/978-0-387-76464-1 ↗
24. 10.1007/s11071-009-9561-510.1007/s11071-009-9561-5 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jsv.2008.07.02910.1016/j.jsv.2008.07.029 ↗
26. Sjoberg P (2005) Numerical solution of the Fokker–Planck approximation of the chemical master equation. PhD Dissertation, Uppsala University, Sweden.
27. 10.1007/978-94-007-2944-510.1007/978-94-007-2944-5 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.10.00310.1016/j.jsv.2005.10.003 ↗
29. 10.1007/PL0001082410.1007/PL00010824 ↗
30. 10.1016/0924-4247(96)80118-X10.1016/0924-4247(96)80118-X ↗
31. Xie W-C (2010) Dynamic Stability of Structures. Reissue ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 454 pp.