Thermoelectric energy harvesting using vapour chamber coolers for aerospace applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Thermoelectric generators (TEGs) have shown great potentials to supply low-power sensor nodes in aerospace applications due to their relatively small size, adequate output power and reliability. TEGs convert waste heat available at aircraft locations into a usable potential difference. However, TEGs’ performance greatly depends on the use of passive cooling systems such as heatsinks to enhance their energy supply. This paper reports the first proof-of-concept use of vapour chambers coupled to traditional circular pin-fin heatsinks to enhance the output power of TEGs. Vapour chambers are compact and small capillary-driven heat spreaders that incorporate a cavity in their volume containing a working fluid to provide a high effective thermal conductivity. Numerical simulations and experimental tests revealed that the use of vapour chambers provided significant increase of the output power, with a maximum produced power of 28.2 W and a relative difference of 6.27 W against conventional energy scavenging configurations. Results demonstrate the high thermal cooling performance of vapour chambers to efficiently support thermal energy harvesting solutions designed for condition and structural health monitoring.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices · Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/ICSENS.2008.471653310.1109/ICSENS.2008.4716533 ↗
2. 10.1007/978-0-387-76464-1_1210.1007/978-0-387-76464-1_12 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.03.00910.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.03.009 ↗
4. 10.1088/1361-665X/aacbac10.1088/1361-665X/aacbac ↗
5. 10.1080/01457632.2018.148086810.1080/01457632.2018.1480868 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.02.07010.1016/j.enconman.2017.02.070 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2010.05.00110.1016/j.paerosci.2010.05.001 ↗
8. 10.1002/stc.252510.1002/stc.2525 ↗
9. Jiang Y · International Scholarly Research Notices · 2013
10. Kazmierski TJ · 2014
11. 10.1134/S106373971702005610.1134/S1063739717020056 ↗
12. 10.1109/JSEN.2009.201931510.1109/JSEN.2009.2019315 ↗
13. 10.1002/978111884894410.1002/9781118848944 ↗
14. 10.1109/ICEPT.2017.804643510.1109/ICEPT.2017.8046435 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.04.01710.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.04.017 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2012.10.01410.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2012.10.014 ↗
17. 10.1007/978-3-7091-1390-510.1007/978-3-7091-1390-5 ↗
18. Paulo J · Proceedings of the world congress on engineering · 2010 · 2 · 168
19. 10.1088/1742-6596/382/1/01202510.1088/1742-6596/382/1/012025 ↗
20. 10.1007/978-0-387-76464-110.1007/978-0-387-76464-1 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.12.05010.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.12.050 ↗
22. Rogers GFC · 1995
23. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/5/05500110.1088/0964-1726/25/5/055001 ↗
24. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/6/00110.1088/0964-1726/15/6/001 ↗
25. 10.1177/1045389X0505668110.1177/1045389X05056681 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.08710.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.087 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.11879710.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118797 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2011.07.00210.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2011.07.002 ↗
29. Wei X · 2006 · 578