journal article·2022-09

Uncertainty analysis of galloping based piezoelectric energy harvester system using polynomial neural network

Rakesha Chandra Dash, Narayan Sharma, Dipak Kumar Maiti, Bhrigu Nath Singh

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper deals with the impact of uncertain input parameters on the electrical power generation of galloping-based piezoelectric energy harvester (GPEH). A distributed parameter model for the system is derived and solved by using Newmark beta numerical integration technique. Nonlinear systems tend to behave in a completely different manner in response to a slight change in input parameters. Due to the complex manufacturing process and various technical defects, randomness in system properties is inevitable. Owing to the presence of randomness within the system parameters, the actual power output differs from the expected one. Therefore, stochastic analysis is performed considering uncertainty in aerodynamic, mechanical, and electrical parameters. A polynomial neural network (PNN) based surrogate model is used to analyze the stochastic power output. A sensitivity analysis is conducted and highly influenced parameters to the electric power output are identified. The accuracy and adaptability of the PNN model are established by comparing the results with Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). Further, the stochastic analyses of power output are performed for various degrees of randomness and wind velocities. The obtained results showed that the influence of the electromechanical coefficient on power output is more compared to other parameters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Aerospace engineering, IIT Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/1/01501410.1088/0964-1726/22/1/015014 ↗
2. 10.1177/1045389X1349101910.1177/1045389X13491019 ↗
3. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/11/11500510.1088/0964-1726/18/11/115005 ↗
4. Alevras P · ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering · 2021 · 7
5. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/10/10501010.1088/0964-1726/19/10/105010 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jsv.2010.01.02810.1016/j.jsv.2010.01.028 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.481140810.1063/1.4811408 ↗
8. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/4/04501210.1088/0964-1726/24/4/045012 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11071-014-1355-810.1007/s11071-014-1355-8 ↗
10. 10.1177/1045389X1453832910.1177/1045389X14538329 ↗
11. 10.1080/15376494.2021.192131610.1080/15376494.2021.1921316 ↗
12. 10.1080/15376494.2021.194308210.1080/15376494.2021.1943082 ↗
13. 10.1080/15397734.2021.196889810.1080/15397734.2021.1968898 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2020.10346310.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2020.103463 ↗
15. 10.1007/978-981-16-0550-5_710.1007/978-981-16-0550-5_7 ↗
16. 10.1177/1045389X1037226110.1177/1045389X10372261 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.04310.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.043 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.05710.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.057 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.007 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2011.02.00310.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2011.02.003 ↗
21. 10.1088/0964-1726/10/2/31410.1088/0964-1726/10/2/314 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.500712110.1063/1.5007121 ↗
23. Hobbs WB · 2010
24. 10.1007/s11081-010-9129-810.1007/s11081-010-9129-8 ↗
25. 10.1140/epjst/e2015-02599-y10.1140/epjst/e2015-02599-y ↗
26. 10.1109/ISIT.2011.603385810.1109/ISIT.2011.6033858 ↗
27. 10.1109/JSAC.2015.239173110.1109/JSAC.2015.2391731 ↗
28. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/5/05502210.1088/0964-1726/20/5/055022 ↗
29. 10.1142/S021987621950061010.1142/S0219876219500610 ↗
30. 10.1007/s12541-011-0151-310.1007/s12541-011-0151-3 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.12.01610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.12.016 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2011.10.00310.1016/j.ijengsci.2011.10.003 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.343655310.1063/1.3436553 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.01.00810.1016/j.engstruct.2011.01.008 ↗
35. 10.1177/136943321663037010.1177/1369433216630370 ↗
36. Rajarathinam M · ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering · 2021 · 7
37. 10.1088/0960-1317/14/5/00910.1088/0960-1317/14/5/009 ↗
38. 10.1002/978111863198010.1002/9781118631980 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11448610.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114486 ↗
40. 10.1177/0021998321104086010.1177/00219983211040860 ↗
41. 10.1080/15376494.2020.180015210.1080/15376494.2020.1800152 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00046-710.1016/S0020-7403(01)00046-7 ↗
43. 10.1177/1045389X1142836610.1177/1045389X11428366 ↗
44. 10.1115/1.400467410.1115/1.4004674 ↗
45. 10.1088/0960-1317/18/11/11502110.1088/0960-1317/18/11/115021 ↗
46. 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.000110710.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001107 ↗
47. 10.1109/TMECH.2014.230818210.1109/TMECH.2014.2308182 ↗
48. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab45fe10.1088/1361-665X/ab45fe ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.09.00710.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.09.007 ↗
50. Wang XQ · ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering · 2021 · 7 · 01090610.1115/1.4049208 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.tws.2014.12.02410.1016/j.tws.2014.12.024 ↗
52. 10.1007/s11071-014-1369-210.1007/s11071-014-1369-2 ↗
53. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/2/02502610.1088/0964-1726/23/2/025026 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.11417410.1016/j.enconman.2021.114174 ↗
55. 10.1063/1.479273710.1063/1.4792737 ↗
56. 10.1007/s11071-019-05208-x10.1007/s11071-019-05208-x ↗
57. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/12/12500310.1088/0964-1726/22/12/125003 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.sna.2014.04.01910.1016/j.sna.2014.04.019 ↗