Experimental and numerical analysis of piezoelectric active repair of edge-cracked plate
Source abstract
Abstract
This article proposes an alternative model for active repair for an edge-cracked plate with adhesively bonded piezoelectric actuator. It computes the Mode-I stress intensity factor (SIF) produced by the piezoelectric actuators using appropriate derived geometrical weight functions. Furthermore, this article presents an experimental study to verify the proposed analytical model and the finite element analysis using ANSYS software. Therefore, the analytical, finite element and experimental results for Mode-I opening of the crack conditions are demonstrated. Parametric analysis to understand the influence and to study the efficiency of the piezoelectric actuator on mitigation of the Mode-I SIF was conducted. The obtained analytical solution is applicable in the calculation of Mode-I SIF with reasonable accuracy. The result indicated that the maximum reduction of SIF is achieved with the application of high external voltage and thin thickness actuator. The relative errors of the analytical model and the experimental results are less than 10% in all the cases studied in this article.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Funding
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.799-800.78810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.799-800.788 ↗
2. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1115.51710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1115.517 ↗
3. 10.3390/act402007710.3390/act4020077 ↗
4. 10.1177/1045389X1667256210.1177/1045389X16672562 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.10.00810.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.10.008 ↗
6. 10.1177/1045389X1142528110.1177/1045389X11425281 ↗
7. 10.1201/978142005821510.1201/9781420058215 ↗
8. ASTM-E 1820 · 2007
9. Baker A · 2012
10. Baker A · 1993
11. 10.1016/0167-8442(84)90035-110.1016/0167-8442(84)90035-1 ↗
12. Baker AA · 2003
13. 10.1111/j.1747-1567.1988.tb02203.x10.1111/j.1747-1567.1988.tb02203.x ↗
14. Bueckner H · Zeitschrift Fuer Angewandte Mathematik & Mechanik · 1970 · 50 · 529
15. 10.2514/3.979210.2514/3.9792 ↗
16. 10.1007/BF0233031110.1007/BF02330311 ↗
17. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) · 1988
18. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.06.01410.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.06.014 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2006.11.00410.1016/j.tafmec.2006.11.004 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.11.00410.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.11.004 ↗
21. Physik Instrumente (PI Ceramic) GmbH & Co. KG · 2005
22. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/8/08500910.1088/0964-1726/20/8/085009 ↗
23. 10.1016/0020-7683(72)90040-610.1016/0020-7683(72)90040-6 ↗
24. 10.1016/0020-7683(81)90091-310.1016/0020-7683(81)90091-3 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.08.00310.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.08.003 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.07.01410.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.07.014 ↗
27. 10.2514/3.1307310.2514/3.13073 ↗
28. Tada H · 2000
29. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.09.01810.1016/j.compstruc.2004.09.018 ↗
30. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/1/01300110.1088/0964-1726/21/1/013001 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.09.01210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.09.012 ↗
32. 10.1088/0964-1726/11/3/31110.1088/0964-1726/11/3/311 ↗
33. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/10/10502510.1088/0964-1726/19/10/105025 ↗
34. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/11/11502310.1088/0964-1726/20/11/115023 ↗
35. 10.1007/s12206-010-1020-110.1007/s12206-010-1020-1 ↗