Ultra-low frequency broadband gap optimization of 1D periodic structure with dual power-law acoustic black holes
Source abstract
Abstract
The acoustic black hole (ABH) structure has gradually become a research hotspot in recent years due to its ascendant capacity of vibration attenuation and energy accumulation. To further improve the performance of vibration and noise reduction, the ultra-low frequency broadband gap of a one-dimensional structure embedded ABHs with power-law material properties is investigated in this paper. Based on the Euler-Bernoulli theory, the Transfer Matrix Method (TMM) is used to establish the dynamic model of the dual power-law ABH (DP-ABH) beam. The band structure results obtained by TMM and the finite element method are compared with each other to verify the ultra-low broadband gap of the structure. Comparison with the traditional ABH show that the ultra-low frequency performance of the DP-ABH is due to the enhanced local resonator properties with reduction of dual power-law local stiffness. Parameter analysis served as a guide for optimization is carried out and a method of combining NSGA-II and TMM is applied to optimize the ABH section with full parameters, to consider a trade-off between lower bandgaps and higher stiffness. The investigation shows that the ultra-low broadband gaps of the periodic DP-ABHs structure, which meets adequate stiffness requirements, can be designed by optimized configuration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Nonlinear Dynamics and Control, Tianjin, P.R. China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.08.01110.1016/j.compstruct.2013.08.011 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.07.01410.1016/j.apacoust.2014.07.014 ↗
3. 10.1142/S175882511750078810.1142/S1758825117500788 ↗
4. 10.1121/1.490450110.1121/1.4904501 ↗
5. 10.1109/4235.99601710.1109/4235.996017 ↗
6. 10.1121/1.489020510.1121/1.4890205 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jsv.2010.12.00110.1016/j.jsv.2010.12.001 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.12.09510.1016/j.neucom.2019.12.095 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jsv.2020.11581610.1016/j.jsv.2020.115816 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.00410.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.004 ↗
11. 10.1115/1.403668010.1115/1.4036680 ↗
12. 10.1121/1.511175010.1121/1.5111750 ↗
13. Huang W · 2019 · 259 · 7763
14. 10.1016/j.jsv.2020.11576410.1016/j.jsv.2020.115764 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.02.04310.1016/j.jsv.2019.02.043 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.06.03410.1016/j.ymssp.2019.06.034 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.12.06110.1016/j.istruc.2020.12.061 ↗
18. Krylov VV · Soviet Physics – Technical Physics · 1990 · 35 · 137
19. Krylov VV · Acta Acustica United with Acustica · 2004 · 90 · 830
20. Krylov VV · Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics · 2000 · 2 · 263
21. 10.1016/j.jsv.2003.05.01010.1016/j.jsv.2003.05.010 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2012.10.00310.1016/j.enganabound.2012.10.003 ↗
23. 10.1177/1045389X1875818410.1177/1045389X18758184 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jsv.2018.10.00910.1016/j.jsv.2018.10.009 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10483-020-2568-710.1007/s10483-020-2568-7 ↗
26. 10.1121/1.508168010.1121/1.5081680 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.06.03610.1016/j.jsv.2019.06.036 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jsv.2020.11561910.1016/j.jsv.2020.115619 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jsv.2018.04.04210.1016/j.jsv.2018.04.042 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.11516410.1016/j.jsv.2019.115164 ↗
31. Mironov M · Soviet Physics – Technical Physics · 1988 · 34 · 318
32. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.02.05910.1016/j.ymssp.2016.02.059 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.04.02910.1016/j.jsv.2019.04.029 ↗
34. 10.1121/1.496173510.1121/1.4961735 ↗
35. 10.1006/jsvi.1995.042010.1006/jsvi.1995.0420 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.498345910.1063/1.4983459 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.11.01010.1016/j.jsv.2016.11.010 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.10625710.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106257 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.10641010.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106410 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.03.03110.1016/j.jsv.2016.03.031 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.06.00410.1016/j.ymssp.2019.06.004 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.16510310.1103/PhysRevB.65.165103 ↗
43. 10.1142/S021797921950124810.1142/S0217979219501248 ↗
44. 10.1115/1.403326310.1115/1.4033263 ↗
45. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/6/06502110.1088/0964-1726/23/6/065021 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.10.02910.1016/j.jsv.2016.10.029 ↗
47. 10.1142/S175882511750074010.1142/S1758825117500740 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.10382410.1016/j.jmps.2019.103824 ↗