A rate-dependent KP modeling and direct compensation control technique for hysteresis in piezo-nanopositioning stages
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper first presents a rate-dependent Krasnosel’skii-Pokrovskii (RKP) model to capture the hysteresis of piezo-nanopositioning stages. The dynamic density function of the RKP model is obtained via neural network with frequency behavior input signal. Under the persistently exciting condition, the convergence of the neural network with Krasnosel’skii-Pokrovskii (KP) operators is proved rigorously. In order to address the hysteresis issue, a direct compensation control (DCC) approach with the KP compensation operator is proposed, where its dynamic density function is same as that of the RKP model. Some experiments with different reference signals are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed modeling and DCC method on piezo-nanopositioning stages.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Piezoelectric Actuators and Control · Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Airborne Optical Imaging and Measurement, Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin, China
Department of Control Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
Funding
Program of Science and Technology Development Plan of Jilin Province of China · china postdoctoral science foundation
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TMECH.2012.220526510.1109/TMECH.2012.2205265 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10688010.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106880 ↗
3. 10.1109/TCST.2020.304601910.1109/TCST.2020.3046019 ↗
4. 10.1109/TIE.2016.254278010.1109/TIE.2016.2542780 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.12.03210.1016/j.ymssp.2015.12.032 ↗
6. 10.1109/ACC.1994.75230210.1109/ACC.1994.752302 ↗
7. 10.1109/72.41036510.1109/72.410365 ↗
8. 10.1109/TCST.2015.241349710.1109/TCST.2015.2413497 ↗
9. 10.1109/TMECH.2005.84470510.1109/TMECH.2005.844705 ↗
10. 10.1109/TAC.2005.84920510.1109/TAC.2005.849205 ↗
11. 10.1109/TAC.2009.201298410.1109/TAC.2009.2012984 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.483339910.1063/1.4833399 ↗
13. 10.3390/s2018506210.3390/s20185062 ↗
14. 10.1109/TMECH.2018.280576110.1109/TMECH.2018.2805761 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.sna.2016.09.00910.1016/j.sna.2016.09.009 ↗
16. 10.1109/TIE.2017.270802410.1109/TIE.2017.2708024 ↗
17. 10.23919/ChiCC.2019.886508210.23919/ChiCC.2019.8865082 ↗
18. 10.1109/TMECH.2005.84470810.1109/TMECH.2005.844708 ↗
19. 10.1109/TAC.2005.84921510.1109/TAC.2005.849215 ↗
20. Visintin A · 2013
21. 10.1109/TCYB.2016.264465610.1109/TCYB.2016.2644656 ↗
22. 10.1177/1045389X980090060510.1177/1045389X9800900605 ↗
23. 10.1109/TCST.2012.220602910.1109/TCST.2012.2206029 ↗
24. 10.1049/el.2016.355810.1049/el.2016.3558 ↗
25. 10.1109/TMAG.2017.270047910.1109/TMAG.2017.2700479 ↗
26. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.284053810.1109/ACCESS.2018.2840538 ↗
27. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/12/12500610.1088/0964-1726/24/12/125006 ↗
28. 10.1109/TMECH.2021.307505710.1109/TMECH.2021.3075057 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.automatica.2015.04.01210.1016/j.automatica.2015.04.012 ↗
30. 10.1109/TCYB.2018.282651910.1109/TCYB.2018.2826519 ↗
31. 10.1080/02564602.2015.112620210.1080/02564602.2015.1126202 ↗