journal article·2022-03

A rate-dependent KP modeling and direct compensation control technique for hysteresis in piezo-nanopositioning stages

Rui Xu, Dapeng Tian, Miaolei Zhou

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper first presents a rate-dependent Krasnosel’skii-Pokrovskii (RKP) model to capture the hysteresis of piezo-nanopositioning stages. The dynamic density function of the RKP model is obtained via neural network with frequency behavior input signal. Under the persistently exciting condition, the convergence of the neural network with Krasnosel’skii-Pokrovskii (KP) operators is proved rigorously. In order to address the hysteresis issue, a direct compensation control (DCC) approach with the KP compensation operator is proposed, where its dynamic density function is same as that of the RKP model. Some experiments with different reference signals are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed modeling and DCC method on piezo-nanopositioning stages.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Piezoelectric Actuators and Control · Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Airborne Optical Imaging and Measurement, Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin, China

Department of Control Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China

Funding

Program of Science and Technology Development Plan of Jilin Province of China · china postdoctoral science foundation

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TMECH.2012.220526510.1109/TMECH.2012.2205265 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10688010.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106880 ↗
3. 10.1109/TCST.2020.304601910.1109/TCST.2020.3046019 ↗
4. 10.1109/TIE.2016.254278010.1109/TIE.2016.2542780 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.12.03210.1016/j.ymssp.2015.12.032 ↗
6. 10.1109/ACC.1994.75230210.1109/ACC.1994.752302 ↗
7. 10.1109/72.41036510.1109/72.410365 ↗
8. 10.1109/TCST.2015.241349710.1109/TCST.2015.2413497 ↗
9. 10.1109/TMECH.2005.84470510.1109/TMECH.2005.844705 ↗
10. 10.1109/TAC.2005.84920510.1109/TAC.2005.849205 ↗
11. 10.1109/TAC.2009.201298410.1109/TAC.2009.2012984 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.483339910.1063/1.4833399 ↗
13. 10.3390/s2018506210.3390/s20185062 ↗
14. 10.1109/TMECH.2018.280576110.1109/TMECH.2018.2805761 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.sna.2016.09.00910.1016/j.sna.2016.09.009 ↗
16. 10.1109/TIE.2017.270802410.1109/TIE.2017.2708024 ↗
17. 10.23919/ChiCC.2019.886508210.23919/ChiCC.2019.8865082 ↗
18. 10.1109/TMECH.2005.84470810.1109/TMECH.2005.844708 ↗
19. 10.1109/TAC.2005.84921510.1109/TAC.2005.849215 ↗
20. Visintin A · 2013
21. 10.1109/TCYB.2016.264465610.1109/TCYB.2016.2644656 ↗
22. 10.1177/1045389X980090060510.1177/1045389X9800900605 ↗
23. 10.1109/TCST.2012.220602910.1109/TCST.2012.2206029 ↗
24. 10.1049/el.2016.355810.1049/el.2016.3558 ↗
25. 10.1109/TMAG.2017.270047910.1109/TMAG.2017.2700479 ↗
26. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.284053810.1109/ACCESS.2018.2840538 ↗
27. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/12/12500610.1088/0964-1726/24/12/125006 ↗
28. 10.1109/TMECH.2021.307505710.1109/TMECH.2021.3075057 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.automatica.2015.04.01210.1016/j.automatica.2015.04.012 ↗
30. 10.1109/TCYB.2018.282651910.1109/TCYB.2018.2826519 ↗
31. 10.1080/02564602.2015.112620210.1080/02564602.2015.1126202 ↗