Vibration control with the converse flexoelectric effect on the laminated beams
Source abstract
Abstract
Flexoelectric material under inhomogeneous electric field can be used as control and actuation systems in engineering applications based on the converse flexoelectric effect. The electric field gradient can be generated by using the atomic force microscope probe placed on the top of flexoelectric layer and coupled with a bottom electrode surface. The induced membrane force and the corresponding control moment in turn influence the dynamic response of the beam. The response of a laminated cantilever beam with initial vibration caused by an external loading is studied. The beam was modelled as a laminated beam to explore the influence of flexoelectric layer stiffness on the dynamic response of the structure. When the flexoelectric layer has higher Young’s modulus and mass density than the elastic layer, with increasing the thickness of the flexoelectric layer, the tip displacement of the laminated beam decreased rapidly. Through case studies, the optimal control positions for each mode of vibration were found to be dependent on the flexoelectric layer properties as well. A displacement-based feedback control was introduced to avoid overactuation caused by open-loop control.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures · Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China
Interdisciplinary Research Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0953-8984/16/13/00610.1088/0953-8984/16/13/006 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10853-005-5916-610.1007/s10853-005-5916-6 ↗
3. 10.1088/1361-665X/aadab310.1088/1361-665X/aadab3 ↗
4. 10.1115/IMECE2011-6512310.1115/IMECE2011-65123 ↗
5. 10.1115/IMECE2012-8721510.1115/IMECE2012-87215 ↗
6. 10.1115/1.402304410.1115/1.4023044 ↗
7. 10.1177/1045389X1452170110.1177/1045389X14521701 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.03.01610.1016/j.jsv.2015.03.016 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.135644410.1063/1.1356444 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.151855910.1063/1.1518559 ↗
11. 10.1177/1045389X1880344110.1177/1045389X18803441 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2018.06.00210.1016/j.euromechsol.2018.06.002 ↗
13. 10.1109/SPAWDA.2011.616729810.1109/SPAWDA.2011.6167298 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.physleta.2012.03.04910.1016/j.physleta.2012.03.049 ↗
15. 10.1007/978-94-024-1258-110.1007/978-94-024-1258-1 ↗
16. 10.1088/1361-665X/aadd5b10.1088/1361-665X/aadd5b ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.04010.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.040 ↗
18. 10.1142/S021798491850372410.1142/S0217984918503724 ↗
19. 10.1115/IMECE2016-6652710.1115/IMECE2016-66527 ↗