Vibration control of a flexible rotor suspended by shape memory alloy wires
Source abstract
Abstract
The present contribution is devoted to the study of the influence of shape memory alloys on the dynamic behavior of flexible rotors. In this sense, a suspension composed by pseudoelastic shape memory alloy wires that are connected to a rotor-bearing test rig was designed. To evaluate the performance of the system, both numerical and experimental investigations are carried out. The suspension stiffness can vary, especially in the pseudoelastic region, so that this variation takes place per a hysteretic cycle denoting energy dissipation whenever the loading magnitude is sufficient to induce a phase transformation. The constitutive model used to describe the shape memory alloy behavior is a modified version of the Brinson model for the one-dimensional case. To provide all thermomechanical properties of shape memory alloy wire, a complete characterization process was performed. Due to numerical reasons, the size of the model of the rotating system was reduced. Finally, numerical and experimental results demonstrate the success of shape memory alloy applied to the suspension of rotating machines as an interesting alternative for vibration control.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
School of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
Funding
Danmarks Tekniske Universitet · Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico · Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior · Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Alves MTS · 2015
2. Alves MTS · 2015
3. Atepor L · 2008
4. 10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00490-410.1016/S1359-6454(97)00490-4 ↗
5. 10.1260/1750-9548.7.3.19710.1260/1750-9548.7.3.197 ↗
6. 10.1177/1045389X930040021310.1177/1045389X9300400213 ↗
7. 10.1177/1045389X960070011210.1177/1045389X9600700112 ↗
8. 10.1177/1045389X1558590010.1177/1045389X15585900 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.01.02310.1016/j.jsv.2016.01.023 ↗
10. Enemark S · 2015
11. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/8/08501810.1088/0964-1726/23/8/085018 ↗
12. 10.14429/dsj.53.226310.14429/dsj.53.2263 ↗
13. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/1/01410.1088/0964-1726/16/1/014 ↗
14. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/1/01510.1088/0964-1726/16/1/015 ↗
15. Lalanne M · 1997
16. Lees AW · 2007
17. 10.1115/94-GT-06010.1115/94-GT-060 ↗
18. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/12/12501610.1088/0964-1726/23/12/125016 ↗
19. 10.1201/978142002779210.1201/9781420027792 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0022-460X(87)80217-110.1016/S0022-460X(87)80217-1 ↗
21. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.327-328.9910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.327-328.99 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.09.01810.1016/j.jsv.2012.09.018 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.23310.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.233 ↗
24. 10.1177/1045389X1668284810.1177/1045389X16682848 ↗
25. 10.1109/CSIE.2009.83210.1109/CSIE.2009.832 ↗