journal article·2000-09

Feasibility Study of Microfabrication by Coextrusion (MFCX) Hollow Fibers for Active Composites

Bryan J. Cannon, Diann Brei

Publisher page

Abstract

Active composites based on a hollow fiber topology have advantages over solid piezoelectric fiber composites in that they require lower voltages for activation and are not limited to electrically non-conductive matrix materials. One critical issue for hollow fiber composites is the fiber aspect ratio (ratio of wall thickness to fiber radius). In this paper analytical and finite element models, which include electric field variations, were developed to determine the “effective d 31 ”of an individual piezoelectric hollow fiber. The effective fiber properties were used to derive a single-row lamina strain/electric field model from classical composite theory. The models were validated with a series of deflection/voltage experiments conducted with hollow piezoelectric fibers fabricated utilizing microfabrication by coextrusion (MFCX) techniques. To determine the feasibility of MFCX hollow fiber composites, the models and experimental results were employed to study the effect of the fiber aspect ratio on a variety of fiber/composite design issues: fiber/lamina performance, fiber strength, matrix material, and electric field effects (incomplete poling and field concentrations).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/1045389X940050040710.1177/1045389X9400500407 ↗
2. Bent, A. A. · Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures · 1997 · 8
3. 10.1088/0964-1726/5/1/00510.1088/0964-1726/5/1/005 ↗
4. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02448.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02448.x ↗
5. 10.1016/0924-4247(95)01221-410.1016/0924-4247(95)01221-4 ↗
6. 10.1080/0015019810821962510.1080/00150198108219625 ↗
7. Hagood, N. W. · 3625
8. Halliday, D. · 1988
9. 10.1115/1.362959010.1115/1.3629590 ↗
10. Herold-Schmidt, U. · Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering · 1997 · 3044 · 168
11. Hyer, M. W. · 1998
12. Jang, B. Z. · 661
13. Krishna-Murty, A. V. · Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society of Optical Engineering · 1996 · 2717 · 482
14. Maclean, B. J.
15. Rodgers, J. P. · Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering · 1996 · 2717 · 642
16. 10.1051/jp3:199419110.1051/jp3:1994191 ↗
17. Safari, A. · Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering · 1996 · 2721 · 240
18. Schetky, L. McD. · Smart Structures and Materials American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Aerospace Division (Publication) · 24 · 65
19. Shigley, J. E. · 1989
20. 10.1117/12.24081910.1117/12.240819 ↗
21. 10.1080/0015019950823603310.1080/00150199508236033 ↗
22. Young, W. C. · 1989
23. 10.1063/1.35326110.1063/1.353261 ↗
24. Zhang, Q. M. · Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering · 1993 · 1916 · 244