Novel active magnetorheological knee prosthesis presents low energy consumption during ground walking
Source abstract
Abstract
This study analyses the energy consumption of an active magnetorheological knee (AMRK) actuator that was designed for transfemoral prostheses. The system was developed as an operational motor unit (MU), which consists of an EC motor, a harmonic drive and a magnetorheological (MR) clutch, that operates in parallel with an MR brake. The dynamic models of the MR brake and MU were used to simulate the system’s energetic expenditure during over-ground walking under three different working conditions: using the complete AMRK; using just its motor-reducer, to operate as a common active knee prosthesis (CAKP), and using just the MR brake, to operate as a common semi-active knee prosthesis (CSAKP). The results are used to compare the MR devices power consumptions with that of the motor-reducer. As previously hypothesized, to use the MR brake in the swing phase is more energetically efficient than using the motor-reducer to drive the joint. Even if using the motor-reducer in regenerative braking mode during the stance phase, the differences in power consumption among the systems are remarkable. The AMRK expended 16.3 J during a gait cycle, which was 1.6 times less than the energy expenditure of the CAKP (26.6 J), whereas the CSAKP required just 6.0 J.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Muscle activation and electromyography studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate Program in Mechanical Engineering, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitoria, Brazil
Graduate Program in Mechanical Engineering, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Funding
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior · Fundação Estadual de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Espírito Santo
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Andrade RM · BR Patent Application · 2016
2. Andrade RM (2018) Joelho magneto-reológico para próteses transfemurais: prototipagem digital, fabricação e identificação experimental. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte. Available at: https://repositorio.ufmg.br/handle/1843/BUBD-AZ2MNM
3. 10.1088/1361-665X/aadd5c10.1088/1361-665X/aadd5c ↗
4. 10.1109/ICAR46387.2019.898164210.1109/ICAR46387.2019.8981642 ↗
5. 10.1109/ICORR.2019.877943210.1109/ICORR.2019.8779432 ↗
6. 10.3109/0309364820916657310.3109/03093648209166573 ↗
7. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa549410.1088/1361-665X/aa5494 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10846-018-0828-210.1007/s10846-018-0828-2 ↗
9. 10.1109/IECON.2010.567546110.1109/IECON.2010.5675461 ↗
10. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/3/03502310.1088/0964-1726/19/3/035023 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.03010.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.030 ↗
12. 10.1109/ICORR.2017.800942910.1109/ICORR.2017.8009429 ↗
13. 10.1108/0143991031045770610.1108/01439910310457706 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.03.01810.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.03.018 ↗
15. 10.1097/01.phm.0000174665.74933.0b10.1097/01.phm.0000174665.74933.0b ↗
16. 10.1177/1045389X0809430310.1177/1045389X08094303 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2006.01.01710.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2006.01.017 ↗
18. 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.222564010.1109/TNSRE.2012.2225640 ↗
19. Leal-Junior AG · Recent Advances in Robotic Systems · 2016 · 1 · 203
20. 10.1016/j.yofte.2020.10218410.1016/j.yofte.2020.102184 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10846-013-9979-310.1007/s10846-013-9979-3 ↗
22. 10.1109/MCS.2018.286660510.1109/MCS.2018.2866605 ↗
23. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa57c510.1088/1361-665X/aa57c5 ↗
24. 10.1682/JRRD.2008.09.013110.1682/JRRD.2008.09.0131 ↗
25. 10.1109/TMECH.2018.282006510.1109/TMECH.2018.2820065 ↗
26. 10.1109/TIE.2014.230005910.1109/TIE.2014.2300059 ↗
27. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/8/08500910.1088/0964-1726/25/8/085009 ↗
28. 10.1109/ICORR.2017.800942010.1109/ICORR.2017.8009420 ↗
29. 10.1109/ICORR.2019.877953210.1109/ICORR.2019.8779532 ↗
30. 10.1109/TMECH.2013.229196610.1109/TMECH.2013.2291966 ↗
31. 10.1177/027836491454567310.1177/0278364914545673 ↗
32. 10.1177/1045389X2094257710.1177/1045389X20942577 ↗
33. 10.12989/sss.2016.17.2.27510.12989/sss.2016.17.2.275 ↗
34. 10.1007/s12206-016-1236-910.1007/s12206-016-1236-9 ↗
35. 10.1109/ICRA.2013.663103810.1109/ICRA.2013.6631038 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.11.01810.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.11.018 ↗
37. 10.1109/TMECH.2009.203268810.1109/TMECH.2009.2032688 ↗
38. 10.1109/LRA.2016.251782010.1109/LRA.2016.2517820 ↗
39. 10.1177/1045389X1247030510.1177/1045389X12470305 ↗
40. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/8/08501810.1088/0964-1726/22/8/085018 ↗
41. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/11/11500710.1088/0964-1726/25/11/115007 ↗
42. 10.1109/TPEL.2013.224461710.1109/TPEL.2013.2244617 ↗