journal article·2018-08

Magnetic circuit analysis to obtain the magnetic permeability of magnetorheological elastomers

Anil K Bastola, Milan Paudel, Lin Li

Publisher page

Abstract

The magnetic permeability of magnetorheological elastomers must be known for their long-term use in the actual engineering systems. In this article, the magnetic permeability of both isotropic and anisotropic magnetorheological elastomers has been determined using a new method. The magnetic induction was measured and a closed magnetic circuit analysis was carried out to obtain the magnetic permeability of magnetorheological elastomers for both isotropic and anisotropic magnetorheological elastomers with 10%–50% volume concentration of carbonyl iron particles. The magnetic permeability was increased with increasing particle concentration for both isotropic and anisotropic magnetorheological elastomers as we could expect. The isotropic permeability is always lower than the anisotropic permeability. The maximum relative permeability value of 6.6 was obtained for 50% particle volume concentration. The experimental results also show a good agreement with theoretical predictions and previous investigations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

Institute for Sports Research, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

Funding

Ministry of Education, Singapore

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/1045389X1875435010.1177/1045389X18754350 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.00610.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.006 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10853-018-2012-210.1007/s10853-018-2012-2 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matlet.2009.07.03210.1016/j.matlet.2009.07.032 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jiec.2010.12.00110.1016/j.jiec.2010.12.001 ↗
6. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa549c10.1088/1361-665X/aa549c ↗
7. 10.1016/S0957-4158(99)00064-110.1016/S0957-4158(99)00064-1 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.36968210.1063/1.369682 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0304-8853(02)00484-510.1016/S0304-8853(02)00484-5 ↗
10. 10.1109/20.28086610.1109/20.280866 ↗
11. 10.1177/1045389X1772103510.1177/1045389X17721035 ↗
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/12/12300110.1088/0964-1726/23/12/123001 ↗
13. Marcon P, Ostanina K (2012) Overview of methods for magnetic susceptibility measurement. In: Proceedings of the PIERS, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 27–30 March, pp. 420–424. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/65c5/a3d8e22b6247cebd6044ab6ea31af9594ec1.pdf
14. 10.1088/0964-1726/5/5/00910.1088/0964-1726/5/5/009 ↗
15. 10.1177/1045389X1453501110.1177/1045389X14535011 ↗
16. 10.1109/TMAG.2017.269840310.1109/TMAG.2017.2698403 ↗
17. 10.1109/T-AIEE.1948.505982110.1109/T-AIEE.1948.5059821 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.175907310.1063/1.1759073 ↗
19. Schubert G · 2014
20. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.01.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.01.008 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.12.00310.1016/j.jmmm.2015.12.003 ↗
22. Sihvola A, Lindell IV (1997) Homogenisation problems of mixtures involving non-isotropic constituent materials. Technical Report. Electromagnetics Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, pp. 191–194. www.maths.gla.ac.uk/events/tropics/proc/ps/P70_SIH2.PS
23. 10.1002/adem.20140025810.1002/adem.201400258 ↗
24. 10.1115/SMASIS2008-56610.1115/SMASIS2008-566 ↗
25. 10.1115/1.316031610.1115/1.3160316 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.479604610.1063/1.4796046 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2007.03.02910.1016/j.cnsns.2007.03.029 ↗
28. 10.1088/0964-1726/12/1/31610.1088/0964-1726/12/1/316 ↗
29. Zhou GY · Smart Structures and Materials Active Materials: Behavior and Mechanics · 2003 · 5053 · 603
30. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.07110.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.071 ↗