Aeroelastic response of a selectively compliant morphing aerofoil featuring integrated variable stiffness bi-stable laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
Distributed compliance systems with integrated variable stiffness elements show great promise for reconciling the conflicting requirements of morphing. The distinct structural properties of each equilibrium configuration allow bi-stable laminates to provide stiffness variability in a purely elastic, energy-efficient manner. This article presents a novel morphing concept based on a distributed arrangement of embeddable variable stiffness bi-stable composites inside a 500 mm chord NACA 0012 profile (where ‘NACA’ is the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics). The structural response of the aerofoil is assessed numerically and experimentally, with a particular focus on the global stiffness modification potential via the snap-through of the component laminates. Extending the validated finite element models to include a weak static aeroelastic coupling permits evaluation of the aerodynamic adequacy of the final, passively morphed shapes. This concurrent aero-structural methodology is finally employed to develop an improved design. The results allow for assessing the feasibility and potential of the innovative morphing approach exploiting selective compliance provided by the stiffness variability of the integrated bi-stable elements.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Structural Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Composite Materials and Adaptive Structures, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Abaqus Analysis User’s Manual · 2012
2. Ajaj RM · 2013
3. Amacher R · 2013
4. 10.1016/j.ast.2013.05.00410.1016/j.ast.2013.05.004 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.473941210.1063/1.4739412 ↗
6. 10.1177/1045389X1244991810.1177/1045389X12449918 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.016 ↗
8. Arrieta AF · 2013
9. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.03.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2014.03.017 ↗
10. 10.5139/IJASS.2011.12.3.22510.5139/IJASS.2011.12.3.225 ↗
11. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/3/03501410.1088/0964-1726/18/3/035014 ↗
12. 10.1177/1045389X1141408410.1177/1045389X11414084 ↗
13. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/2/02502010.1088/0964-1726/22/2/025020 ↗
14. Campanile LF · 2003
15. 10.1177/1045389X0504669210.1177/1045389X05046692 ↗
16. 10.1002/9780470512067.ch410.1002/9780470512067.ch4 ↗
17. Cugnoni J, Amacher R, Botsis J (2013) Thin ply technology advantages: An overview of the TPT-TECA project. Available at: http://www.thinplytechnology.com/mesimages/fichiers/TPTTECA-characterization-program-May-2013.pdf (accessed 2016).
18. 10.1016/j.tws.2007.11.00210.1016/j.tws.2007.11.002 ↗
19. 10.1007/978-3-642-84010-4_110.1007/978-3-642-84010-4_1 ↗
20. Drela M · 2001
21. 10.1088/0964-1726/17/01/01502510.1088/0964-1726/17/01/015025 ↗
22. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/10/10300110.1088/0964-1726/20/10/103001 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00159-810.1016/S0266-3538(02)00159-8 ↗
24. 10.1109/3516.80951810.1109/3516.809518 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.02710.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.027 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.06110.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.061 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.07.00110.1016/j.paerosci.2013.07.001 ↗
28. 10.1002/we.53110.1002/we.531 ↗
29. Mattioni F · 2009
30. 10.2514/1.J05271510.2514/1.J052715 ↗
31. 10.2514/6.2015-026910.2514/6.2015-0269 ↗
32. North Thin Ply Technology (2013) M40J/736 Property Data Sheet.
33. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.01.03210.1016/j.compstruc.2007.01.032 ↗
34. Potter K · 2006
35. 10.1177/10453890303926110.1177/104538903039261 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.09.01110.1016/j.matdes.2009.09.011 ↗
37. 10.1016/S1270-9638(00)01069-510.1016/S1270-9638(00)01069-5 ↗
38. 10.1017/S000192400000206210.1017/S0001924000002062 ↗
39. 10.2514/4.86903710.2514/4.869037 ↗
40. 10.2514/1.C03106010.2514/1.C031060 ↗
41. 10.1002/978047051206710.1002/9780470512067 ↗
42. Weisshaar TA · 2006
43. Winkler M (2012) Analysis of corrugated laminates. PhD thesis, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
44. Wright JR · 2008
45. Zündel M · 2013