journal article·2025-05

A prismatic approach to describe the hysteretic behavior of smart materials: An application to shape memory alloys

Vanderson M Dornelas, Sergio A Oliveira, Marcelo A Savi

Publisher page

Abstract

Hysteretic response of smart materials has complex mathematical modeling. Thermodynamic-based constitutive models belong to an important class of models and data-driven models are interesting alternatives that avoid complex algorithms and parameter determinations. The classical Preisach model describes multidisciplinary hysteretic behavior employing mathematical operators in a triangular domain. The Everett function is an alternative build a surface from experimental data, replacing the original integral form to a summation. This paper proposes a novel approach, extending the Preisach triangular domain to a prismatic domain that allows a broader description of distinct phenomena. The idea is to use the Preisach approach for different triangles and then performing a interpolation for a prismatic domain, enabling the representation of distinct phenomena that, otherwise would not be described. Shape memory alloys (SMAs) are employed as a representative example of smart materials. Experimental tests are developed in order to define reference cases to be analyzed. Numerical simulations are carried out and compared with experimental data, evaluating the model capabilities under different loading conditions. Specifically, temperature-dependent and cyclic-dependent behaviors are of concern. The results show the model ability to describe the general thermomechanical behavior of shape memory alloy hysteretic behavior, being in close agreement with experimental data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Topology Optimization in Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Nonlinear Mechanics, COPPE - Mechanical Engineering, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Department of Mechanical Engineering, CEFET/RJ - Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Funding

Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior · Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico · Air Force Office of Scientific Research

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s40830-022-00382-110.1007/s40830-022-00382-1 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.11126410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.111264 ↗
3. 10.1088/1361-665X/ad23f810.1088/1361-665X/ad23f8 ↗
4. 10.1504/IJVD.2021.11716410.1504/IJVD.2021.117164 ↗
5. 10.1680/jcien.15.0001010.1680/jcien.15.00010 ↗
6. Chaudhary K, Haribhakta VK, Jadhav PV (2024) A review of shape memory alloys in MEMS devices and biomedical applications. Materials Today Proceedings. 1–6.
7. 10.1016/j.cja.2018.09.00610.1016/j.cja.2018.09.006 ↗
8. 10.1007/s40830-018-0161-410.1007/s40830-018-0161-4 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2015.08.00610.1016/j.ijplas.2015.08.006 ↗
10. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/10/10300110.1088/0964-1726/25/10/103001 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.physb.2003.08.08010.1016/j.physb.2003.08.080 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.sna.2014.09.02610.1016/j.sna.2014.09.026 ↗
13. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/8/08503210.1088/0964-1726/20/8/085032 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.10534510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105345 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.11.02310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.11.023 ↗
16. Elahinia MH (2016) Shape Memory Alloy Actuators: Design, Fabrication, and Experimental Evaluation. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
17. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10731610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107316 ↗
18. 10.1088/1742-6596/2741/1/01204610.1088/1742-6596/2741/1/012046 ↗
19. 10.1109/ROBOT.1998.68064110.1109/ROBOT.1998.680641 ↗
20. 10.1177/1045389X21105721610.1177/1045389X211057216 ↗
21. 10.1007/s40830-022-00393-y10.1007/s40830-022-00393-y ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11156310.1016/j.matdes.2022.111563 ↗
23. 10.1177/1045389X23116706810.1177/1045389X231167068 ↗
24. 10.1088/0964-1726/6/3/00710.1088/0964-1726/6/3/007 ↗
25. 10.1117/12.20093310.1117/12.200933 ↗
26. 10.2320/matertrans.47.68210.2320/matertrans.47.682 ↗
27. 10.1007/BF0247955010.1007/BF02479550 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.11238410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112384 ↗
29. 10.1088/1361-665X/aafcd910.1088/1361-665X/aafcd9 ↗
30. Khandelwal A, Buravalla V (2009) Models for shape memory alloy behavior: An overview of modeling approaches. The International Journal of Structural Changes in Solids 1(1): 111–148.
31. 10.1117/12.47523010.1117/12.475230 ↗
32. 10.1080/15376494.2024.230747110.1080/15376494.2024.2307471 ↗
33. 10.1007/s00419-019-01529-w10.1007/s00419-019-01529-w ↗
34. Lagoudas DC (2008) Shape Memory Alloys, Modeling and Engineering Applications. Austin, TX: Springer.
35. 10.1177/095441001771619310.1177/0954410017716193 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ast.2018.02.01010.1016/j.ast.2018.02.010 ↗
37. Lecce L, Concilio A (2015) Shape Memory Alloy Engineering for Aerospace, Structural and Biomedical Applications. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
38. 10.1002/978047020972110.1002/9780470209721 ↗
39. 10.3390/act1201002510.3390/act12010025 ↗
40. 10.1109/TASE.2013.228443710.1109/TASE.2013.2284437 ↗
41. Machado LG, Savi MA (2003) Medical applications of shape memory alloys. Asian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 36(6): 683–691.
42. 10.2172/691169410.2172/6911694 ↗
43. Mayergoyz ID (2003) Mathematical Models of Hysteresis and Their Applications. College Park, MD: Academic Press.
44. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.08410.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.084 ↗
45. 10.1177/0954411922109346010.1177/09544119221093460 ↗
46. 10.3390/bioengineering602003710.3390/bioengineering6020037 ↗
47. 10.1007/s40430-015-0476-410.1007/s40430-015-0476-4 ↗
48. 10.1007/s11012-018-0836-010.1007/s11012-018-0836-0 ↗
49. 10.1155/MPE/2006/5687610.1155/MPE/2006/56876 ↗
50. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa770610.1088/1361-665X/aa7706 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.12.01910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.12.019 ↗
52. 10.1007/BF0134941810.1007/BF01349418 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.09.00210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.09.002 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.11.00610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.11.006 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.10494510.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.104945 ↗
56. 10.1088/1361-665X/aae3b810.1088/1361-665X/aae3b8 ↗
57. 10.3390/s2213486010.3390/s22134860 ↗
58. 10.1007/s40830-021-00330-510.1007/s40830-021-00330-5 ↗
59. 10.1088/1402-4896/ad4aa210.1088/1402-4896/ad4aa2 ↗
60. 10.1177/1045389X22111154710.1177/1045389X221111547 ↗
61. 10.1137/1.978089871747110.1137/1.9780898717471 ↗
62. 10.1109/TMECH.2005.84470810.1109/TMECH.2005.844708 ↗
63. 10.1088/1361-665X/ad636710.1088/1361-665X/ad6367 ↗
64. 10.1108/0143991071074960910.1108/01439910710749609 ↗
65. 10.1007/s12555-022-1024-510.1007/s12555-022-1024-5 ↗
66. 10.1063/1.486870810.1063/1.4868708 ↗
67. 10.1109/TAC.2021.310953310.1109/TAC.2021.3109533 ↗
68. 10.1007/s11071-020-06121-410.1007/s11071-020-06121-4 ↗
69. 10.1007/s00161-022-01087-710.1007/s00161-022-01087-7 ↗
70. 10.1109/ICCA.2007.437635510.1109/ICCA.2007.4376355 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.cja.2016.07.00210.1016/j.cja.2016.07.002 ↗
72. 10.1533/978085709262510.1533/9780857092625 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.msea.2024.14644310.1016/j.msea.2024.146443 ↗