Resilient deconstructible columns for accelerated bridge construction in seismically active areas
Source abstract
Abstract
This article presents an unprecedented concept for resilient bridge columns comprising precast modules designed for disassembly. Resiliency is provided by superelastic shape memory alloys that minimize permanent drift and engineered cementitious composite that minimizes damage, while keeping the rest of the column elastic. The precast modules consist of prefabricated plastic hinges and prefabricated concrete-filled fiber–reinforced polymer tubes. The columns are very desirable candidates for accelerated bridge construction. Two ¼-scale column models with engineered cementitious composite plastic hinges incorporating two types of shape memory alloy bars, one made of nickel–titanium and the other of copper–aluminum–manganese, were designed and tested under simulated earthquakes. To assess the influence of reusing column components, each of the models was first tested under a series of ground motions, and then the models were disassembled, inspected, reassembled, and subsequently retested. The reassembled models reached the same capacity as the original models but were more flexible. A simple modeling method was able to match the global measured response of the models with a reasonable accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Freese and Nichols, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA
Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA
Funding
Division of Industrial Innovation and Partnerships · Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/eqe.102910.1002/eqe.1029 ↗
2. 10.1002/stc.164410.1002/stc.1644 ↗
3. Ardakani S · 2013
4. Barthes C · 2012
5. Belleri A · 2013
6. 10.1193/112512EQS337M10.1193/112512EQS337M ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:4(353)10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:4(353) ↗
8. Choi H · ACI Structural Journal · 2010 · 107 · 3
9. Crowther P (2005) Design for disassembly—themes and principles. BDP Environment Design Guide. Available at: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/2888/1/Crowther-RAIA-2005.PDF
10. Cruz-Noguez C · 2010
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000061110.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000611 ↗
12. Culmo MP · 2011
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(38)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(38) ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000076210.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000762 ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000129210.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001292 ↗
16. Fischer G · ACI Structural Journal · 2002 · 99 · 781
17. Griffis L · 1992 · 6
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000105410.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001054 ↗
19. Guo T · Journal of Structural Engineering · 2015 · 544 · 04015088
20. Hendriks C, Worrell E, De Jager D, (1998) Emission reduction of greenhouse gases from the cement industry. In: Proceedings of fourth international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, Available at: http://www.wbcsdcement.org/pdf/tf1/prghgt42.pdf
21. Hewes JT · 2002
22. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/8/08502910.1088/0964-1726/24/8/085029 ↗
23. International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) · 2001
24. 10.1017/CBO978051154601310.1017/CBO9780511546013 ↗
25. 10.5459/bnzsee.33.3.265-28510.5459/bnzsee.33.3.265-285 ↗
26. Laplace P · 1999
27. McKenna F, Fenves G, Scott M (2000) Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
28. Mander JB · 1997
29. 10.1260/1369-4332.18.4.57110.1260/1369-4332.18.4.571 ↗
30. Motaref S · 2011
31. 10.1080/15732479.2013.87605610.1080/15732479.2013.876056 ↗
32. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) (2015) PEER NGA-West2 Database. University of California, Berkeley. Available at: http://ngawest2.berkeley.edu (accessed 24 January 2016).
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:7(982)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:7(982) ↗
34. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1560)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1560) ↗
35. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.01310.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.013 ↗
36. Saiidi M · ACI Structural Journal · 2006 · 103 · 436
37. Saiidi M · ACI Structural Journal · 2009 · 106 · 69
38. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:1(101)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:1(101) ↗
39. 10.1002/eqe.224110.1002/eqe.2241 ↗
40. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/2/02502510.1088/0964-1726/22/2/025025 ↗
41. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000096110.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000961 ↗
42. 10.15554/pcij.03011997.20.2310.15554/pcij.03011997.20.23 ↗
43. Tazarv M · 2014
44. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000080610.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000806 ↗
45. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000117610.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001176 ↗
46. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000086710.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000867 ↗
47. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000069210.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000692 ↗
48. Varela S · International Journal of Bridge Engineering · 2014 · 2 · 29
49. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/7/07501210.1088/0964-1726/25/7/075012 ↗
50. Vosooghi A · ACI Structural Journal · 2012 · 109 · 825
51. 10.1061/40946(248)2710.1061/40946(248)27 ↗
52. Webster M · 2005
53. Wehbe N · 1997
54. 10.1146/annurev.energy.26.1.30310.1146/annurev.energy.26.1.303 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.00610.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.006 ↗
56. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000019110.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000191 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.018 ↗