Sensitivity analysis of piezoaeroelastic energy harvesters
Source abstract
Abstract
We perform a sensitivity analysis of a piezoaeroelastic energy harvester consisting of a pitching and plunging rigid airfoil supported by flexural and torsional springs with a piezoelectric coupling attached to the plunge degree of freedom. We employ the nonintrusive formulation of the polynomial chaos expansion in terms of the multivariate Hermite polynomials to quantify the effects of variations in the load resistance, the eccentricity (distance between the center of mass and the elastic axis), and the nonlinear coefficients of the springs on the harvested power and the pitch and plunge amplitudes. As a first step, the normal form of the dynamics of the system near the Hopf bifurcation is used to select parameters that ensure a supercritical instability and maximize the generated power. The results show that the harvested power can be mostly affected by the eccentricity. Moreover, decreasing the nonlinear coefficient of the torsional spring results in a decrease in the pitch amplitude and an increase in the plunge amplitude and hence the harvested power. These results give guidance for optimizing and assessing the uncertainty in the performance of piezoaeroelastic energy harvesters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11071-011-0233-x10.1007/s11071-011-0233-x ↗
2. 10.1007/s11071-011-0234-910.1007/s11071-011-0234-9 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11071-011-0035-110.1007/s11071-011-0035-1 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11071-011-0245-610.1007/s11071-011-0245-6 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jsv.2011.12.02110.1016/j.jsv.2011.12.021 ↗
6. 10.1117/12.77499010.1117/12.774990 ↗
7. 10.1023/B:NODY.0000045544.96418.bf10.1023/B:NODY.0000045544.96418.bf ↗
8. 10.1117/12.81578510.1117/12.815785 ↗
9. 10.1117/12.84578410.1117/12.845784 ↗
10. 10.1038/sj.sc.310140110.1038/sj.sc.3101401 ↗
11. 10.2514/1.4009210.2514/1.40092 ↗
12. 10.1177/1045389X1037226110.1177/1045389X10372261 ↗
13. 10.2514/2.185310.2514/2.1853 ↗
14. 10.1177/1045389X0809809610.1177/1045389X08098096 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.342740510.1063/1.3427405 ↗
16. Ghanem RG · 2003
17. 10.1023/A:102217490970510.1023/A:1022174909705 ↗
18. Gilliatt HC · AIAA Journal · 2003 · 98
19. 10.2514/6.2004-461910.2514/6.2004-4619 ↗
20. 10.2514/6.2006-89110.2514/6.2006-891 ↗
21. 10.1117/12.65876510.1117/12.658765 ↗
22. 10.1006/jsvi.1999.289510.1006/jsvi.1999.2895 ↗
23. 10.1117/12.77585110.1117/12.775851 ↗
24. Mola A (2010) Multi-physics and multilevel fidelity modeling and analysis of Olympic rowing boat dynamics. PhD Thesis, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
25. 10.1007/s12283-011-0075-210.1007/s12283-011-0075-2 ↗
26. 10.1088/0960-1317/10/2/30710.1088/0960-1317/10/2/307 ↗
27. 10.1002/978352763580110.1002/9783527635801 ↗
28. 10.1115/IMECE2006-1407810.1115/IMECE2006-14078 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0010-2180(02)00503-510.1016/S0010-2180(02)00503-5 ↗
30. 10.1177/1045389X0505404210.1177/1045389X05054042 ↗
31. 10.2514/6.1999-146310.2514/6.1999-1463 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00092-510.1016/S0021-9991(03)00092-5 ↗
33. 10.1117/12.60113110.1117/12.601131 ↗