A review on multi-physics numerical modelling in different applications of magnetorheological fluids
Source abstract
Abstract
Magnetorheological fluids involve multi-physics phenomena which are manifested by interactions between structural mechanics, electromagnetism and rheological fluid flow. In comparison with analytical models, numerical models employed for magnetorheological fluid applications are thought to be more advantageous, as they can predict more phenomena, more parameters of design, and involve fewer model assumptions. On that basis, the state-of-the-art numerical methods that investigate the multi-physics behaviour of magnetorheological fluids in different applications are reviewed in this article. Theories, characteristics, limitations and considerations employed in numerical models are discussed. Modelling of magnetic field has been found to be rather an uncomplicated affair in comparison to modelling of fluid flow field which is rather complicated. This is because, the former involves essentially one phenomenon/mechanism, whereas the latter involves a plethora of phenomena/mechanisms such as laminar versus turbulent rheological flow, incompressible versus compressible flow, and single- versus two-phase flow. Moreover, some models are shown to be still incapable of predicting the rheological nonlinear behaviour of magnetorheological fluids although they can predict the dynamic characteristics of the system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Mechanical Engineering Branch, Military Technical College, Cairo, Egypt
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/fluids401000510.3390/fluids4010005 ↗
2. 10.1177/1045389X1875435010.1177/1045389X18754350 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2007.03.02810.1016/j.cnsns.2007.03.028 ↗
4. 10.1088/1361-6439/ab3f4c10.1088/1361-6439/ab3f4c ↗
5. ANSYS (2009) ANSYS Fluent 12.0 Theory Guide. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS, Inc.
6. ANSYS (2011) ANSYS Fluent UDF Manual. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS, Inc.
7. 10.1177/1045389X960070020110.1177/1045389X9600700201 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.09.02010.1016/j.jmmm.2014.09.020 ↗
9. 10.1080/00423114.2014.90994310.1080/00423114.2014.909943 ↗
10. 10.3389/fmats.2019.0003610.3389/fmats.2019.00036 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.07.05010.1016/j.ymssp.2018.07.050 ↗
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/8/08501410.1088/0964-1726/24/8/085014 ↗
13. 10.1109/TMAG.2013.224140210.1109/TMAG.2013.2241402 ↗
14. 10.1016/0021-9991(80)90163-110.1016/0021-9991(80)90163-1 ↗
15. 10.1017/S002211208500262210.1017/S0022112085002622 ↗
16. 10.1177/1045389X1247435510.1177/1045389X12474355 ↗
17. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab034710.1088/1361-665X/ab0347 ↗
18. Bingham E (1922) Fluidity and Plasticity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. 10.1121/1.190824110.1121/1.1908241 ↗
20. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06377.x10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06377.x ↗
21. 10.1016/B978-0-08-099995-1.00003-810.1016/B978-0-08-099995-1.00003-8 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2008.11.01910.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2008.11.019 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.simpat.2011.01.00110.1016/j.simpat.2011.01.001 ↗
24. Bouc R (1971) A Mathematical Model for Hysteresis. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 24(1): 16–25.
25. 10.1038/nmat262710.1038/nmat2627 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.01.04310.1016/j.compstruc.2007.01.043 ↗
27. 10.1002/1521-4001(200201)82:1<3::AID-ZAMM3>3.0.CO;2-O10.1002/1521-4001(200201)82:1<3::AID-ZAMM3>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.000009210.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000092 ↗
29. Carlson D Goncalves F Catanzarite D et al. (2008) Controllable magnetorheological fluid valve devices and methods. Patent application 20080060710 USA.
30. 10.1260/1750-9548.7.1.6110.1260/1750-9548.7.1.61 ↗
31. 10.1109/TMECH.2013.226570110.1109/TMECH.2013.2265701 ↗
32. Casson N (1959) A flow equation for pigment-oil suspensions of the printing ink type. Rheology of Disperse Systems 1959: 84–104.
33. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/6/06501310.1088/0964-1726/20/6/065013 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.04.00710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.04.007 ↗
35. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/1/01700110.1088/0964-1726/24/1/017001 ↗
36. 10.1177/1045389X1140445510.1177/1045389X11404455 ↗
37. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/2/02501410.1088/0964-1726/21/2/025014 ↗
38. 10.1109/TMECH.2018.283345910.1109/TMECH.2018.2833459 ↗
39. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/5/05500210.1088/0964-1726/25/5/055002 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.494316810.1063/1.4943168 ↗
41. 10.1122/1.497859410.1122/1.4978594 ↗
42. 10.1155/2015/58307610.1155/2015/583076 ↗
43. 10.1177/1045389X0505052910.1177/1045389X05050529 ↗
44. Chooi WW (2005) Experimental characterisation of the properties of magnetorheological (MR) fluids and MR damper. PhD Thesis, The University of Manchester, Manchester.
45. 10.1117/12.60092310.1117/12.600923 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.02.00210.1016/j.compstruc.2007.02.002 ↗
47. 10.1115/1.314288410.1115/1.3142884 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.07.00710.1016/j.ymssp.2018.07.007 ↗
49. COMSOL (2018) COMSOL Multiphysics Reference Manual. Stockholm: COMSOL, Inc.
50. Czop P, Gniłka J (2017) Reducing aeration and cavitation effect in shock absorbers using fluid-structure interaction simulation. Computer Assisted Methods in Engineering and Science 23(4): 171–189.
51. 10.3390/ma1221357410.3390/ma12213574 ↗
52. 10.1177/1045389X1983595510.1177/1045389X19835955 ↗
53. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/12/12501910.1088/0964-1726/24/12/125019 ↗
54. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/11/11500310.1088/0964-1726/22/11/115003 ↗
55. 10.1155/2015/91585910.1155/2015/915859 ↗
56. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/6/00810.1088/0964-1726/13/6/008 ↗
57. 10.1002/047001382610.1002/0470013826 ↗
58. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/1/01502410.1088/0964-1726/25/1/015024 ↗
59. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.635-637.7010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.635-637.70 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.09810.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.098 ↗
61. 10.1177/095440621665362110.1177/0954406216653621 ↗
62. 10.3389/fmats.2019.0002710.3389/fmats.2019.00027 ↗
63. El-Aouar W (2002) Finite element analysis based modeling of magneto rheological dampers. MSc Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
64. 10.1243/095765005X3130610.1243/095765005X31306 ↗
65. 10.3849/aimt.0128710.3849/aimt.01287 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.10526510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105265 ↗
67. 10.1016/S0307-904X(99)00047-510.1016/S0307-904X(99)00047-5 ↗
68. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/9/09500110.1088/0964-1726/18/9/095001 ↗
69. 10.1142/9789814340236_006610.1142/9789814340236_0066 ↗
70. 10.3390/app608020610.3390/app6080206 ↗
71. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa549410.1088/1361-665X/aa5494 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.04.01110.1016/j.compfluid.2012.04.011 ↗
73. Glen D, Lindler J, Wereley N (2000) Bingham biplastic analysis of shear thinning and thickening in magnetorheological dampers. In: Proceedings of SPIE 3985, smart structures and materials (ed Wereley NM), Newport Beach, CA, 6–9 March, pp. 444–455. Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
74. Glowinski R (1985) Numerical Methods for Nonlinear Variational Problems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
75. 10.1145/1186562.101574610.1145/1186562.1015746 ↗
76. 10.1109/CarpathianCC.2017.797041610.1109/CarpathianCC.2017.7970416 ↗
77. 10.1049/PBCS058E_ch410.1049/PBCS058E_ch4 ↗
78. 10.1515/ama-2015-002110.1515/ama-2015-0021 ↗
79. 10.1007/978-3-319-13233-410.1007/978-3-319-13233-4 ↗
80. 10.1515/ama-2017-003510.1515/ama-2017-0035 ↗
81. 10.1109/REM.2018.842180010.1109/REM.2018.8421800 ↗
82. Goncalves FD (2009) An alternate operation mode for MR fluidsmagnetic gradient pinch. Journal of Physics: Conference Series149(1): 012050.
83. 10.1243/09544062JMES112910.1243/09544062JMES1129 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.02.04010.1016/j.jmmm.2014.02.040 ↗
85. 10.1155/2019/938304710.1155/2019/9383047 ↗
86. 10.1177/1045389X1350057610.1177/1045389X13500576 ↗
87. 10.3389/fmats.2019.0029310.3389/fmats.2019.00293 ↗
88. Guo Q, Hua D (2017) Inverse modeling and optimization of magnetorheological damper. Revista de la Facultad de Ingenieria 32(10): 788–795.
89. 10.1007/s40430-018-1066-z10.1007/s40430-018-1066-z ↗
90. Gurubasavaraju M, Kumar H, Mahalingam A (2018b) Performance analysis of a semi-active suspension system using coupled CFD-FEA based non-parametric modeling of low capacity shear mode monotube MR damper. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 233(5): 1214–1231.
91. 10.2514/1.C03529810.2514/1.C035298 ↗
92. 10.1088/1361-665X/aafe2b10.1088/1361-665X/aafe2b ↗
93. Herschel WH, Bulkley R (1926) Consistency measurements of rubber benzene solutions. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 39(4): 291–300.
94. 10.2514/1.3273610.2514/1.32736 ↗
95. 10.1016/B978-075066594-0/50046-110.1016/B978-075066594-0/50046-1 ↗
96. 10.1109/ICMA.2015.723745710.1109/ICMA.2015.7237457 ↗
97. 10.1177/1045389X1243672710.1177/1045389X12436727 ↗
98. 10.1117/12.83745510.1117/12.837455 ↗
99. 10.1177/1045389X1984400310.1177/1045389X19844003 ↗
100. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab15bc10.1088/1361-665X/ab15bc ↗