Reconsidering the McKibben muscle: Energetics, operating fluid, and bladder material
Source abstract
Abstract
In spite of extensive modeling and characterization efforts, little is known about the energetics of McKibben muscle actuators. This article experimentally investigates the effectiveness of traditional McKibben muscles at converting fluid energy delivered to the actuator to mechanical output work over full actuation cycles. Once these efficiency metrics are established, a comparison of the efficiencies of traditional pneumatic fluidic artificial muscles and hydraulic fluidic artificial muscles is presented. Two new hydraulic oil compatible bladder materials are tested—an elastomeric Viton bladder and an inelastic low-density polyethylene bladder. The performance of these muscle variants is compared by measuring blocked force and free contraction as a function of pressure, hysteresis, and energy efficiencies. The measurement of fluid volume delivered to the fluidic artificial muscles over their actuation ranges is shown to be useful for evaluating the accuracy of existing cylindrical volume models. Models of the energy conversion efficiency are developed and compared to the experimental data. The results show that using an inelastic bladder significantly improves the efficiency, force capacity, and contraction range of McKibben muscles; however, it also increases the actuator’s hysteretic behavior. Powering the muscles hydraulically and operating at higher pressures improves the efficiency as well.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Soft Robotics and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1117/12.200953310.1117/12.2009533 ↗
2. Blackburn JF · 1960
3. 10.1109/70.48175310.1109/70.481753 ↗
4. 10.1109/IROS.2001.97636110.1109/IROS.2001.976361 ↗
5. 10.1109/IROS.2010.565043210.1109/IROS.2010.5650432 ↗
6. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/1/01401610.1088/0964-1726/22/1/014016 ↗
7. Kang B-S · 2009 · 182
8. 10.1115/1.48247810.1115/1.482478 ↗
9. 10.1115/1.315898210.1115/1.3158982 ↗
10. Manring N · 2005
11. 10.1115/SMASIS2013-321010.1115/SMASIS2013-3210 ↗
12. 10.1163/016918609X1258620996736610.1163/016918609X12586209967366 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.315904310.1115/1.3159043 ↗
14. 10.1108/0143991131132085910.1108/01439911311320859 ↗
15. 10.1177/1045389X1141886010.1177/1045389X11418860 ↗
16. 10.1177/1045389X1243862710.1177/1045389X12438627 ↗
17. 10.1177/1045389X1143543510.1177/1045389X11435435 ↗
18. 10.1109/37.83363810.1109/37.833638 ↗
19. 10.1177/027836490505243710.1177/0278364905052437 ↗
20. 10.1109/ROBOT.2000.84529910.1109/ROBOT.2000.845299 ↗
21. U.S. Plastic Corporation (2014) Tubing, hose & fittings. Available at: http://www.usplastic.com/catalog/default.aspx?catid=856&clickid=popcorn (accessed 1 July 2014).
22. 10.1007/s10514-005-0726-x10.1007/s10514-005-0726-x ↗
23. Viton ® Fluoroelastomer (n.d.) http://www.dupont.com/products-and-services/plastics-polymers-resins/elastomers/brands/viton-fluoroelastomer.html (accessed 2 April 2014).
24. 10.1109/TMECH.2009.203837310.1109/TMECH.2009.2038373 ↗
25. 10.1177/1045389X1142421610.1177/1045389X11424216 ↗
26. Woods BKS, Kothera CS, Wereley NM (2012) Fluidic artificial muscle actuator and swaging process therefor. Patent US8307753 B2.