A morphing trailing edge device for a wind turbine
Source abstract
Abstract
The loads on wind turbine components are primarily from the blades. It is important to control these loads in order to avoid damaging the wind turbine. Rotor control technology is currently limited to controlling the rotor speed and the blade pitch. As blades increase in length, it becomes less desirable to pitch the entire blade as a single rigid body, but there is a requirement to control loads more precisely along the length of the blade. This can be achieved with aerodynamic control devices such as flaps. Morphing structures are good candidates for wind turbine flaps because they have the potential to create structures that have the conflicting abilities of being load carrying, lightweight and shape adaptive. A morphing flap design with an anisotropic cellular structure is presented, which is able to undergo large deflections and high strains. An aeroelastic analysis couples the work done by aerodynamic loads on the flap, the flap strain energy and the required actuation work to change shape. The morphing flap model is manufactured, and its stiffness is measured.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Wind Energy Research and Development · Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Abbott IH, Von Doenhoff AE (1959) Theory of Wing Sections. 2nd ed. New York: Dover Publications, pp.536–537.
2. 10.1177/1045389X1141408410.1177/1045389X11414084 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2009.08.00210.1016/j.paerosci.2009.08.002 ↗
4. 10.1177/1045389X0404279810.1177/1045389X04042798 ↗
5. Berg DE · 2009
6. Berg DE · 2009
7. 10.1002/we.7610.1002/we.76 ↗
8. Buhl T · 2007
9. Burton T · 2001 · 4610.1002/0470846062 ↗
10. 10.1177/1045389X0504669210.1177/1045389X05046692 ↗
11. 10.1002/9780470512067.ch410.1002/9780470512067.ch4 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ast.2004.07.00710.1016/j.ast.2004.07.007 ↗
13. 10.4050/JAHS.45.22810.4050/JAHS.45.228 ↗
14. Daynes S · 2011
15. 10.2514/1.4538910.2514/1.45389 ↗
16. 10.2514/1.4428710.2514/1.44287 ↗
17. Drela M · 2001
18. 10.1088/0964-1726/17/01/01502510.1088/0964-1726/17/01/015025 ↗
19. 10.1177/1045389X950060050110.1177/1045389X9500600501 ↗
20. 10.1002/adem.20100014010.1002/adem.201000140 ↗
21. 10.1007/3-540-29284-510.1007/3-540-29284-5 ↗
22. Hexcel (2010) HexWeb®Nonmetallic Flex-Core Honeycomb Product Data. Stamford, CT: Hexcel Corporation, pp.1–4. Available at: http://www.hexcel.com
23. 10.1098/rspa.1997.011710.1098/rspa.1997.0117 ↗
24. Johnson SJ, Van Dam CP, Berg DE (2008) Active load control techniques for wind turbines. SAND2008–4809, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, pp.1–124.10.2172/943932 ↗
25. 10.1177/1045389X0934302610.1177/1045389X09343026 ↗
26. 10.1177/1045389X0404279610.1177/1045389X04042796 ↗
27. Lachenal X · Wind Energy
28. 10.1002/we.14110.1002/we.141 ↗
29. Madsen HA · 2010
30. 10.2514/6.2007-173510.2514/6.2007-1735 ↗
31. Phillips WH · National Advisory Council for Aeronautics · 1949 · 927 · 1
32. Purser PE · National Advisory Council for Aeronautics · 1944 · 4 · 1
33. Sears RI · National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics · 1943 · 663 · 1
34. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.09.01110.1016/j.matdes.2009.09.011 ↗
35. 10.1117/12.56264510.1117/12.562645 ↗
36. 10.1017/S000192400000206210.1017/S0001924000002062 ↗
37. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/9/09401010.1088/0964-1726/20/9/094010 ↗
38. 10.1177/1045389X1141263810.1177/1045389X11412638 ↗
39. Wayne J (1980) Helicopter Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp.405–406.
40. Wildschek A · 2008
41. 10.1243/09544100JAERO62210.1243/09544100JAERO622 ↗
42. Wilson DG · 2009