journal article·2014-01

Design and performance of variable-shaped piezoelectric energy harvesters

Samah Ben Ayed, Abdessattar Abdelkefi, Fehmi Najar, Muhammad R Hajj

Publisher page

Abstract

We investigate the effects of shape variations of a cantilever beam on its performance as an energy harvester. The beam is composed of piezoelectric and metallic layers (unimorph design) with a rigid mass attached to its free end. A reduced-order model based on a one-mode Galerkin approach is derived. Solutions for the tip displacement, generated voltage, and harvested power are then obtained. Linear and quadratic shape variations are considered in order to design piezoelectric energy harvesters that can generate energy at low frequencies and maximize the harvested energy. The results show that the fundamental natural frequency and mode shape are strongly affected when the shape of the beam is varied. The influence of the electrical load resistance and the shape parameters at resonance on the system’s performance is discussed. It is determined that for specific resistance values, the quadratic shape can yield up to two times the energy harvested by a rectangular shape.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA

Applied Mechanics and Systems Research Laboratory, Tunisia Polytechnic School, University of Carthage, La Marsa, Tunisia

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Abdelkefi A (2012) Global nonlinear analysis of piezoelectric energy harvesting from ambient and aeroelastic vibrations. PhD Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
2. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/1/01501410.1088/0964-1726/22/1/015014 ↗
3. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/11/11500710.1088/0964-1726/20/11/115007 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11071-011-0064-910.1007/s11071-011-0064-9 ↗
5. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/3/R0110.1088/0964-1726/16/3/R01 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00542-009-1000-510.1007/s00542-009-1000-5 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0924-4247(02)00033-X10.1016/S0924-4247(02)00033-X ↗
8. 10.1088/0964-1726/17/4/04300110.1088/0964-1726/17/4/043001 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0924-4247(01)00569-610.1016/S0924-4247(01)00569-6 ↗
10. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/2/02500910.1088/0964-1726/18/2/025009 ↗
11. 10.1088/0960-1317/18/10/10401310.1088/0960-1317/18/10/104013 ↗
12. Masana R · Journal of Vibration and Acoustics: Transactions of the ASME · 2011 · 330 · 6036
13. 10.1177/1045389X0505528010.1177/1045389X05055280 ↗
14. 10.1109/92.92082010.1109/92.920820 ↗
15. 10.1080/15502287.2010.54030010.1080/15502287.2010.540300 ↗
16. 10.1002/978352761756210.1002/9783527617562 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10832-007-9043-410.1007/s10832-007-9043-4 ↗
18. 10.1109/MPRV.2005.1410.1109/MPRV.2005.14 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.08.01810.1016/j.jsv.2005.08.018 ↗
20. 10.1177/058310240404327510.1177/0583102404043275 ↗
21. 10.1109/SENSOR.2003.121700910.1109/SENSOR.2003.1217009 ↗
22. 10.1006/jsvi.1998.183310.1006/jsvi.1998.1833 ↗