journal article·2010-04

Beam Shape Optimization for Power Harvesting

John M. Dietl, Ephrahim Garcia

Publisher page

Abstract

A problem in piezoelectric bimorph energy harvesting is to generate the most power with limits in system mass. The authors propose a new approach: to change the shape of the beam to concentrate the strain in sections of the beam where it can contribute the most to transduction. A vibration model of beams with non-uniform width is developed and validated with shaker table tests. Three beams with different shapes are tested over a wide band, encompassing the lowest two modes of vibration. An optimal beam shape is calculated using a heuristic optimization code and the attributes of this optimal beam are discussed. Then, beam shapes are optimized to allow for increased base excitation and constrained by maximum root strain. Finally, the tip mass-to-beam mass ratio is studied parametrically, correlating increased transduction with increased beam mass.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory for Intelligent Machine Systems, Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Cornell University, 226 Upson Hall, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA,

Laboratory for Intelligent Machine Systems, Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Cornell University, 226 Upson Hall, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TBME.2009.201546010.1109/TBME.2009.2015460 ↗
2. Crandall, S.H., Karnopp, D.C., Kurtz Jr, E.F. and Pndmore-Brown, D.C. 1968. Dynamics of Mechanical and Electromechanical Systems , pp. 291-326, Robert E Krieger Publishing Co., Malabar, Florida.
3. 10.1080/1058458059096457410.1080/10584580590964574 ↗
4. 10.1115/1.289040210.1115/1.2890402 ↗
5. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/2/02500910.1088/0964-1726/18/2/025009 ↗
6. 10.1177/1045389X0809809610.1177/1045389X08098096 ↗
7. 10.1115/1.298109410.1115/1.2981094 ↗
8. 10.1115/1.280251710.1115/1.2802517 ↗
9. 10.1088/0960-1317/18/10/10401310.1088/0960-1317/18/10/104013 ↗
10. 10.1177/1045389X900010030510.1177/1045389X9000100305 ↗
11. Inman, D.J. 2001. Engineering Vibration, 2nd edn, pp. 458-468, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/17/6/06502610.1088/0964-1726/17/6/065026 ↗
13. 10.1002/978352761836110.1002/9783527618361 ↗
14. Paquin, S. · Proceedings of the Cansmart 2009 International Workshop on Smart Materials and Structures · 2009 · 187
15. 10.1115/IMECE2008-6813610.1115/IMECE2008-68136 ↗
16. Rizzoni, G. 2003. Principles and Applications of Electrical Engineering , 4th edn, p. 360, McGraw Hill, Boston .
17. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/5/01810.1088/0964-1726/13/5/018 ↗
18. 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2004.00120.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2004.00120.x ↗
19. Timoshenko, S., Young, D.H. and Weaver, W. 1974. Vibration Problems in Engineering, 4th edn, pp. 415-431, John Wiley and Sons, New York.