Overview of Magnetostrictive Sensor Technology
Source abstract
Abstract
As sensors become integrated in more applications, interest in magnetostrictive sensor technology has blossomed. Magnetostrictive sensors take advantage of the efficient coupling between the elastic and magnetic states of a material to facilitate sensing a quantity of interest. Magnetic and magnetostrictive theory pertinent to magnetostrictive sensor technology is provided. Sensing configurations are based on the utilization of a magnetostrictive element in a passive, active, or combined mode. Magnetostrictive sensor configurations that measure motion, stress or force, torque, magnetic fields, target characteristics, and miscellaneous effects are discussed. The configurations are compared and contrasted in terms of application, sensitivity, and implementation issues. Comparisons are made to other common sensor configurations as appropriate. Experimental and modeling results are described when available and schematics of the configurations are presented.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The Boeing Company, Seattle, WA, USA
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA,
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Bartels, K.A. · 1996
2. 10.1117/12.25916810.1117/12.259168 ↗
3. Calkins, F. · 1997
4. 10.1109/20.27883810.1109/20.278838 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1574-9304(05)80122-110.1016/S1574-9304(05)80122-1 ↗
6. 10.1109/20.29776510.1109/20.297765 ↗
7. Lacheisserie, E. · 1993
8. Ewing, J.A. · 1900
9. Fenn, R.
10. 10.1109/25.4546910.1109/25.45469 ↗
11. Fleming, W.
12. 10.1109/TMAG.1981.106174810.1109/TMAG.1981.1061748 ↗
13. 10.1109/20.14475610.1109/20.144756 ↗
14. 10.1109/20.31251210.1109/20.312512 ↗
15. Hunt, F.V. · America · 1982
16. 10.1007/978-1-4615-3868-410.1007/978-1-4615-3868-4 ↗
17. 10.1088/0022-3727/28/8/00110.1088/0022-3727/28/8/001 ↗
18. Jones, L.
19. 10.1063/1.114393510.1063/1.1143935 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.114486310.1063/1.1144863 ↗
21. 10.1109/20.17950510.1109/20.179505 ↗
22. 10.1109/20.17950410.1109/20.179504 ↗
23. Kwun, H. · 1995
24. 10.1088/0034-4885/18/1/30510.1088/0034-4885/18/1/305 ↗
25. May, R.G. and Claus, R.O. 1996. ``In-situ Fiber Optic Sensor for Composite Cure Monitoring through Characterization of Resin Viscoelasticity,'' SPIE , 2948:24—34.10.1117/12.259207 ↗
26. 10.1049/el:1985083210.1049/el:19850832 ↗
27. 10.1109/20.27880310.1109/20.278803 ↗
28. 10.1109/TMAG.1984.106352210.1109/TMAG.1984.1063522 ↗
29. 10.1109/TMAG.1981.106147210.1109/TMAG.1981.1061472 ↗
30. Nyce, D. · Sensors · 1994 · 22
31. Peyrucat, J. · Mesures · 1986 · 43 · 16
32. Pratt, J. · 1993
33. Pratt, J.
34. Reilly, R. · 1990
35. Ristic, L. · Artech House, Inc · 1994
36. 10.1109/20.33417310.1109/20.334173 ↗
37. 10.1109/TMAG.1986.106438310.1109/TMAG.1986.1064383 ↗
38. Savage, H. · 1993
39. Seekircher, J. · Sensors and Actuators A · 1990 · 21
40. Shimada, M. · Phys. · 1993 · 73 · 6872
41. 10.1109/TMAG.1981.106168910.1109/TMAG.1981.1061689 ↗
42. Weber, R. · US Department of Commerce · 1992 · 87
43. White, S. · USACERL Final Technical Report. · 1996
44. 10.1109/TMAG.1979.106050110.1109/TMAG.1979.1060501 ↗
45. 10.1007/BF0283376010.1007/BF02833760 ↗
46. 10.1109/TMAG.1986.106449410.1109/TMAG.1986.1064494 ↗
47. 10.1364/OL.5.00008710.1364/OL.5.000087 ↗
48. 10.1109/19.65077810.1109/19.650778 ↗