Experimental Characterisation of Aluminium 6082 at Varying Temperature and Strain Rate
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract: This article describes the experimental methodology used in overcoming the challenges of performing tests and recording results on specimens, which are suitable for such a wide range of test conditions. Uniaxial tensile tests were conducted on aluminium alloy 6082‐T352 at varying temperatures and strain rates to validate testing techniques and to determine the effect of these parameters upon this material. The applied strain rate varied over several orders of magnitude – using a screw‐driven tensometer for quasi‐static loading (6.9 × 10−4 s−1), a hydraulic piston rig for moderate strain rate (4.0 × 101 s−1) and a tensile Hopkinson bar for high strain rate (1.5 × 103 s−1). Temperature was varied using a heat gun, and the air temperature was measured using a thermocouple in the hot air stream. Specimen temperature is determined by finite element modelling, and this correlates well with other work. Although it would have been possible to improve the design of individual tests for specific test conditions, an important objective was to conduct the entire series of tests in as consistent a manner as possible. The procedure for characterising the stress–strain behaviour for this material under these different loading conditions is also considered in some detail, as the real material behaviour deviates from simplified elasto‐plastic material models. Results presented for Al 6082 samples show a slight increase in yield stress with increasing strain rate, and a decrease in yield stress with increasing temperature.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Energetic Materials and Combustion · Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.05.00810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.05.008 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.05.00910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.05.009 ↗
3. Shape correction of hot‐rolled sheet steel using an on‐line leveller
4. ASTM A36 · 2003
5. Fire resistance of steel frames
6. Johnson G. R. · 1983 · 1
7. Cowper G. R.andSymonds P. S.(1957)Strain hardening and strain rate effect in the impact loading of cantilever beams. Brown University Division of Applied Mathematics report 28.10.21236/AD0144762 ↗
8. Loveday M. S.(1999)Room temperature tensile testing: a method for estimating uncertainty of merasurement. CMMT(MN)048.
9. Loveday M. S. Gray T.andAegerter J.(2004)Tensile testing of metallic materials: a review.
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000026410.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000264 ↗
11. The fire resistance of aluminium
12. 10.1016/0022-5096(64)90028-610.1016/0022-5096(64)90028-6 ↗
13. Harding J.(1998)Validation of the ELAN software for analysing the tensile SHPB test. UTC report 122; Department of Engineering Science Oxford University.
14. Harding J.andNoble J. P.(1998)An extended hopkinson‐bar analysis; UTC report 124; Department of Engineering Science Oxford University.
15. ASME B31.1‐1995 Power Piping.
16. Temperature, frequency, and young’s modulus of an aluminum tuning fork
17. Dieter G. · 1986
18. Punmia B. C. · 2005
19. 10.1016/0020-7683(91)90114-U10.1016/0020-7683(91)90114-U ↗
20. 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)01228-610.1016/S0924-0136(01)01228-6 ↗
21. Aegerter J. Keller S.andWieser D.(2003)Prüfvorschrift zur Durchführung und Auswertung des Zugversuches für Al‐Werkstoffe Conference transcript of the conference “Werkstoffprüfung 2003” Verlag Stahleisen GmbH Düsseldorf 139–150.
22. 10.1007/BF0232498210.1007/BF02324982 ↗
23. 10.1007/BF0232615010.1007/BF02326150 ↗