High-efficiency Construction and Performance Optimization of Surface-modified LSCF-GDC Multiphase Composite Air Electrodes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced DC-DC Converters · Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. XU Q D, GUO Z J, XIA L C, et al . A comprehensive review of solid oxide fuel cells operating on various promising alternative fuels. Energy Conversion and Management , 2022, 253: 115175.10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115175 ↗
2. SAMREEN A, ALI M S, HUZAIFA M, et al . Advancements in perovskite-based cathode materials for solid oxide fuel cells: a comprehensive review. The Chemical Record , 2024, 24(1): e202300247.10.1002/tcr.202300247 ↗
3. DUBOIS A, RICOTE S, BRAUN R J. Benchmarking the expected stack manufacturing cost of next generation, intermediate- temperature protonic ceramic fuel cells with solid oxide fuel cell technology. Journal of Power Sources , 2017, 369: 65.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.024 ↗
4. YANG G M, SU C, SHI H G, et al . Toward reducing the operation temperature of solid oxide fuel cells: our past 15 years of efforts in cathode development. Energy & Fuels , 2020, 34(12): 15169.10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01887 ↗
5. ZHANG Y, KNIBBE R, SUNARSO J, et al . Recent progress on advanced materials for solid-oxide fuel cells operating below 500 ℃. Advanced Materials , 2017, 29(48): 1700132.10.1002/adma.201700132 ↗
6. ZHOU Y C, ZHANG W L, KANE N, et al . An efficient bifunctional air electrode for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. Advanced Functional Materials , 2021, 31(40): 2105386.10.1002/adfm.202105386 ↗
7. DUAN C C, KEE R, ZHU H Y, et al . Highly efficient reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells for power generation and fuel production. Nature Energy , 2019, 4(3): 230.10.1038/s41560-019-0333-2 ↗
8. CHOI S, YOO S, KIM J, et al . Highly efficient and robust cathode materials for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells: PrBa 0.5 Sr 0.5 Co 2- x Fe x O 5+ δ . Scientific Reports , 2013, 3: 2426.10.1038/srep02426 ↗
9. DUAN C C, TONG J H, SHANG M, et al . Readily processed protonic ceramic fuel cells with high performance at low temperatures. Science , 2015, 349(6254): 1321.10.1126/science.aab3987 ↗
10. 付梦雨, 金英敏, 李栋, 等. 浸渍Gd 0.2 Ce 0.8 O 1.9 对固体氧化物燃料电池La 0.8 Sr 0.2 Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 O 3- δ 阴极铬中毒影响的研究. 陶瓷学报, 2022, 43(1): 54.
11. 张璐, 宦道明, 夏长荣. 固体氧化物燃料电池氧化物修饰镧锶钴铁阴极研究进展. 陶瓷学报, 2022, 43(5): 799.
12. YOON K J, BISWAS M, KIM H J, et al . Nano-tailoring of infiltrated catalysts for high-temperature solid oxide regenerative fuel cells. Nano Energy , 2017, 36: 9.10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.024 ↗
13. REHMAN S U, SONG H S, KIM H S, et al . A dynamic infiltration technique to synthesize nanolayered cathodes for high performance and robust solid oxide fuel cells. Journal of Energy Chemistry , 2022, 70: 201.10.1016/j.jechem.2022.02.052 ↗
14. ZHANG X Y, WANG C X, LIU K, et al . Significantly enhanced stability and activity of a perovskite oxygen electrode for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells by heterointerface engineering. Journal of Advanced Ceramics , 2025, 14(7): 9221108.10.26599/JAC.2025.9221108 ↗
15. SONG Y F, CHEN Y B, WANG W, et al . Self-assembled triple-conducting nanocomposite as a superior protonic ceramic fuel cell cathode. Joule , 2019, 3(11): 2842.10.1016/j.joule.2019.07.004 ↗
16. SHIN J F, XU W, ZANELLA M, et al . Self-assembled dynamic perovskite composite cathodes for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Nature Energy , 2017, 2(3): 16214.10.1038/nenergy.2016.214 ↗
17. LIU T, HUANG S, ZHU S Y, et al . Preparation of cobalt-free composite cathode for efficient high-temperature hydrogen fuel cell via one-pot synthesis method. Journal of Inorganic Materials , 2025, 40(12): 1349.10.15541/jim20250155 ↗
18. KIM J H, KIM J K, SEO H G, et al . Ex-solved Ag nanocatalysts on a Sr-free parent scaffold authorize a highly efficient route of oxygen reduction. Advanced Functional Materials , 2020, 30(27): 2001326.10.1002/adfm.202001326 ↗
19. HU S M, LI J, ZENG Y, et al . A mini review of the recent progress of electrode materials for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , 2023, 25(8): 5926.10.1039/D2CP05133H ↗
20. 薛强, 郑国柱, 吴宇成, 等. 纳米技术在低温可逆固体氧化物电池空气极中的应用及研究进展. 硅酸盐学报, 2025, 53(11): 3404.
21. WANG T P, LI Q N, LIU X C, et al . Nanofabrication technologies for low-temperature solid oxide cells: a comprehensive review of techniques, challenges, and future perspectives. Energy Reviews , 2025, 4(4): 100163.10.1016/j.enrev.2025.100163 ↗
22. CHEN Y, CHOI Y M, YOO S, et al . A highly efficient multi-phase catalyst dramatically enhances the rate of oxygen reduction. Joule , 2018, 2(5): 938.10.1016/j.joule.2018.02.008 ↗
23. ZENG D P, XU K, ZHU F, et al . Enhancing the oxygen reduction reaction activity and durability of a solid oxide fuel cell cathode by surface modification of a hybrid coating. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy , 2023, 48(62): 23992.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.198 ↗
24. WU L, ZHENG H Y, YANG X, et al . Enhanced oxygen evolution rate and anti-interfacial delamination property of the SrCo 0.9 Ta 0.1 O 3- δ @La 0.6 Sr 0.4 Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 O 3- δ oxygen-electrode for solid oxide electrolysis cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces , 2023, 15(45): 52673.
25. SONG Z H, PAN H, WAN G C, et al . Enhancing durability of solid oxide cells for hydrogen production from seawater by designing nano-structured Sm 0.5 Sr 0.5 Co 3- δ infiltrated air electrodes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy , 2023, 48(70): 27095.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.366 ↗
26. CHEN S N, FENG W W, ZHAO Y, et al . Modified La 0.6 Sr 0.4 Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 O 3- δ cathode with the infiltration of Bi 0.8 Ca 0.2 FeO 3- δ for intermediate- temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Ceramics International , 2025, 51(4): 5234.10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.11.497 ↗
27. ZHANG L, XU Y S, XU K, et al . Improving the activity and stability of La 0.6 Sr 0.4 Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 O 3- δ cathode through surface modification with an electro-catalyst. Small , 2025, 21(42): e05019.10.1002/smll.202505019 ↗
28. BIAN W J, WU W, WANG B M, et al . Revitalizing interface in protonic ceramic cells by acid etch. Nature , 2022, 604: 479.10.1038/s41586-022-04457-y ↗
29. DAI H L, DU H Z, LIU Z, et al . Multi-element doped SrFeO 3 - based cathodes with balanced thermal expansion for proton- conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Journal of Advanced Ceramics , 2025, 14(10): 9221165.10.26599/JAC.2025.9221165 ↗
30. 赵浩宇, 吕秋秋, 朱腾龙. 固体氧化物燃料电池电解质与阴极界面研究进展及展望. 硅酸盐学报, 2025, 53(12): 3790.
31. DING D, LI X X, LAI S Y, et al . Enhancing SOFC cathode performance by surface modification through infiltration. Energy & Environmental Science , 2014, 7(2): 552.10.1039/c3ee42926a ↗
32. YANG C H, LI J, YANG C C, et al . A highly active and robust air electrode for reversible protonic ceramic cells: advanced performance achieved by low-Lewis-acid-strength cation doping strategy. ACS Materials Letters , 2024, 6(8): 3540.10.1021/acsmaterialslett.4c00806 ↗
33. WU L, SUN J Q, QI H Y, et al . Boosting steam tolerance and electrochemical performance of an La 0.6 Sr 0.4 Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 O 3- δ -based air electrode for protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry A , 2024, 12: 25979.10.1039/D4TA03706E ↗