Effect of impact velocity and impact angle on residual stress fields caused by foreign object damage
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In order to study the residual stress induced by foreign object damage (FOD), the distribution of residual stress caused by the impact of a hard spherical body was measured via the sin2ψ technique, using synchrotron X‐ray. A steel sphere was impacted onto a flat surface of a Ti‐6Al‐4V alloy from an angle of either 90° or 45°, at a velocity of 180 m/s. The same sphere was also quasi‐statically pressed into the surface. In the cases of right‐angled impact and quasi‐static indentation, a compressive residual stress was extensively distributed inside the generated crater. No remarkable difference in residual stress distribution was noted between the dynamic case and the quasi‐static case. However, at an impact angle of 45°, a tensile residual stress that is more detrimental to fatigue strength was widely distributed inside the crater. Outside of the craters, tensile stress was generally observed in all cases.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Surface Treatment and Residual Stress
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan
AIST‐Kyushu University Hydrogen Materials Laboratory (HydroMate) Fukuoka Japan
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Nicholas T. · 2006
2. 10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00045-X10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00045-X ↗
3. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00168-210.1016/S0142-1123(01)00168-2 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00152-710.1016/S0013-7944(01)00152-7 ↗
5. 10.2472/jsms.51.125910.2472/jsms.51.1259 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00074-210.1016/S0142-1123(99)00074-2 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00160-910.1016/S0142-1123(03)00160-9 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00135-X10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00135-X ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.01210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.012 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.10.00210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.10.002 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.04210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.042 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.03210.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.032 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.10.02010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.10.020 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.10.01410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.10.014 ↗
15. H.Kitagawa S.Takahashi Applicability of fracture mechanics to very small cracks or cracks in the early stage Proceeding of the Second International Conference on Mechanical Behavior of Materials ASM 627–631 1976.
16. 10.1016/0013-7944(79)90081-X10.1016/0013-7944(79)90081-X ↗
17. Murakami Y. · 2002
18. 10.1023/A:102654302170210.1023/A:1026543021702 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0167-6636(01)00064-310.1016/S0167-6636(01)00064-3 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0022-5096(02)00022-410.1016/S0022-5096(02)00022-4 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2006.05.00310.1016/j.mechmat.2006.05.003 ↗
22. Residual stress measurement by x‐ray diffraction SAE International 2003.
23. 10.2472/jsms.47.118810.2472/jsms.47.1188 ↗
24. Prevey P. S. · Adv. X‐Ray Anal. · 1977 · 20 · 345
25. 10.1299/kikaia.66.184710.1299/kikaia.66.1847 ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1982.tb01250.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1982.tb01250.x ↗
27. 10.1016/0025-5416(86)90217-X10.1016/0025-5416(86)90217-X ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.11.01210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.11.012 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2014.07.01610.1016/j.tafmec.2014.07.016 ↗
30. 10.1111/ffe.1298910.1111/ffe.12989 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2013.12.00510.1016/j.tafmec.2013.12.005 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.03.01710.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.03.017 ↗
33. 10.1111/ffe.1248210.1111/ffe.12482 ↗
34. 10.1111/ffe.1279310.1111/ffe.12793 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.12.02110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.12.021 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.02610.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.026 ↗
37. 10.1111/ffe.1232110.1111/ffe.12321 ↗
38. 10.2472/jsms.52.12Appendix_26310.2472/jsms.52.12Appendix_263 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.02010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.020 ↗