Interface Regulation of Electrochemical Potential in NASICON-type Ceramic Solid-state Batteries

1. LIU B, ZHANG J G, XU W. Advancing lithium metal batteries. Joule , 2018, 2(5): 833.10.1016/j.joule.2018.03.008 ↗

2. LI C, CHEN K, ZHOU X, et al . Electrochemically driven conversion reaction in fluoride electrodes for energy storage devices. npj Computational Materials , 2018, 4: 22.10.1038/s41524-018-0079-6 ↗

3. YU Y, LAI C, LEI M, et al . Dual strategies of mild C-F scissoring fluorination and local high-concentration electrolyte to enable reversible Li-Fe-F conversion batteries. Materials Horizons , 2024, 11: 2169.10.1039/D3MH01908J ↗

4. GU Y, HU J, LEI M, et al . Electrochemical activation of ordered mesoporous solid electrolyte interphases to enable ultra-stable lithium metal batteries. Advanced Energy Materials , 2024, 14(4): 2302174.10.1002/aenm.202302174 ↗

5. WU H, HU J, YU S, et al . Heterostructure conductive interface and melt-penetration-bonding process to afford all-solid-state Li-FeF 3 garnet batteries with high cathode loading. Energy & Environmental Science , 2025, 18(2): 923.10.1039/D4EE02947J ↗

6. LEE Y, FUJIKI S, JUNG C, et al . High-energy long-cycling all-solid-state lithium metal batteries enabled by silver-carbon composite anodes. Nature Energy , 2020, 5: 299.10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z ↗

7. NIE X, LEI M, HU J, et al . Boosting Li-ion conductivity of fluoride solid electrolyte by low-temperature molten salt ablation and particle boundary doping. ACS Nano , 2024, 18(43): 30099.10.1021/acsnano.4c12399 ↗

8. HU J, LEI M, ZHU C, et al . Highly conductive doped fluoride solid electrolytes with solidified ionic liquid to enable reversible FeF 3 conversion solid state batteries. Advanced Functional Materials , 2024, 34(41): 2314044.10.1002/adfm.202314044 ↗

9. XIAO Y, WANG Y, BO S, et al . Understanding interface stability in solid-state batteries. Nature Reviews Materials , 2020, 5: 105.10.1038/s41578-019-0157-5 ↗

10. YU Q, HU J, NIE X, et al . Liquid metal mediated heterostructure fluoride solid electrolytes of high conductivity and air stability for sustainable Na metal batteries. ACS Nano , 2024, 18(7): 5790.10.1021/acsnano.3c12256 ↗

11. CHEN R, LI Q, YU X, et al . Approaching practically accessible solid-state batteries: stability issues related to solid electrolytes and interfaces. Chemical Reviews , 2020, 120(14): 6820.10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00268 ↗

12. YU Q, XU Y, HU J, et al . Heterostructured fluoride-based solid electrolytes engineered by grain boundary softening and bonding for sustainable Na metal batteries. Energy Storage Materials , 2024, 73: 103795.10.1016/j.ensm.2024.103795 ↗

13. LIU Y, LEI M, LAI C, et al . Enable high reversibility of Fe/Cu based fluoride conversion batteries via interfacial gas release and detergency of garnet electrolytes. Materials Today , 2022, 61: 65.10.1016/j.mattod.2022.10.019 ↗

14. LIU Y, MENG J, LEI M, et al . Alloyable viscous fluid for interface welding of garnet electrolyte to enable highly reversible fluoride conversion solid state batteries. Advanced Functional Materials , 2023, 33(4): 2208013.10.1002/adfm.202208013 ↗

15. ZHANG Y, MENG J, CHEN K, et al . Garnet-based solid-state lithium fluoride conversion batteries benefiting from eutectic interlayer of superior wettability. ACS Energy Letters , 2020, 5(4): 1167.10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00383 ↗

16. ZHANG Y, MENG J, CHEN K, et al . Behind the candelabra: a facile flame vapor deposition method for interfacial engineering of garnet electrolyte to enable ultralong cycling solid-state Li-FeF 3 conversion batteries. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces , 2020, 12(30): 33729.10.1021/acsami.0c08203 ↗

17. ZENG Y, ZHANG Y, HU J, et al . Garnet-based solid state batteries benefitting from anionic/electronic mixed conductive interface constructed by lithiation of porous FeS 2 . APL Energy , 2024, 2: 026104.10.1063/5.0205603 ↗

18. LEI M, WU X, LIU Y, et al . Polymer electrolytes reinforced by 2D fluorinated filler for all-solid-state Li-Fe-F conversion-type lithium metal batteries. Nano Research , 2023, 16: 8469.10.1007/s12274-023-5406-7 ↗

19. AONO H, SUGIMOTO E, SADAOKA Y, et al . Ionic conductivity of the lithium titanium phosphate (Li 1+ X M X Ti 2- X (PO 4 ) 3 , M=Al, Sc, Y and La) systems. Journal of the Electrochemical Society , 1989, 136(2): 590.10.1149/1.2096693 ↗

20. ZHANG Z, SHAO Y, LOTSCH B V, et al . New horizons for inorganic solid state ion conductors. Energy & Environmental Science , 2018, 11: 1945.10.1039/C8EE01053F ↗

21. ZHANG B, TAN R, YANG L, et al . Mechanisms and properties of ion-transport in inorganic solid electrolytes. Energy Storage Materials , 2018, 10: 139.10.1016/j.ensm.2017.08.015 ↗

22. YANG Q, Li C. Li metal batteries and solid state batteries benefiting from halogen-based strategies. Energy Storage Materials , 2018, 14: 100.10.1016/j.ensm.2018.02.017 ↗

23. HARTMANN P, LEICHTWEISS T, BUSCHE M R, et al . Degradation of NASICON-type materials in contact with lithium metal: formation of mixed conducting interphases (MCI) on solid electrolytes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C , 2013, 117(41): 21064.10.1021/jp4051275 ↗

24. WANG S, XU H, LI W, et al . Interfacial chemistry in solid-state batteries: formation of interphase and its consequences. Journal of the American Chemical Society , 2018, 140(1): 250.10.1021/jacs.7b09531 ↗

25. ZHENG F, SONG Z, LI H, et al . Distinct functional Janus interfaces for dendrite-free Li 1.3 Al 0.3 Ti 1.7 (PO 4 ) 3 -based lithium metal batteries. Electrochimica Acta , 2022, 436: 141395.10.1016/j.electacta.2022.141395 ↗

26. HUANG C, LI Z, DUAN S, et al . Improving the stability of NASICON-type electrolyte with Li metal anode by interfacial modification. Journal of Power Sources , 2022, 536: 231491.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231491 ↗

27. GU Y, HU J, LAI C, et al . NASICON-based solid state Li-fluoride conversion batteries enabled by constructing a fluorine-rich trap for Ti 4+ . Advanced Energy Materials , 2023, 13(12): 2203679.10.1002/aenm.202203679 ↗

28. LEI M, FAN S, YU Y, et al . NASICON-based solid state Li-Fe-F conversion batteries enabled by multi-interface-compatible sericin protein buffer layer. Energy Storage Materials , 2022, 47: 551.10.1016/j.ensm.2022.02.031 ↗

29. WU C, HU J, YANG Q, et al . Open framework perovskite derivate SEI with fluorinated heterogeneous nanodomains for practical Li-metal pouch cells. Nano Energy , 2023, 113: 108523.10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108523 ↗

30. PAOLELLA A, FAURE C, TIMOSHEVSKII V, et al . A review on hexacyanoferrate-based materials for energy storage and smart windows: challenges and perspectives. Journal of Materials Chemistry A , 2017, 5: 18919.10.1039/C7TA05121B ↗

31. ZHANG B, ZHANG Y, LEI M, et al . Lithiation-induced conductivity modulation in Prussian blue interlayer for stable Li/garnet solid-state batteries. Applied Physics Letters , 2023, 122(3): 033901.10.1063/5.0109575 ↗

32. CHEN K, QIU W, LEI M, et al . Manipulating cation-anion coordination in fire-retardant electrolytes to enable high-areal- capacity fluoride conversion batteries. Matter , 2024, 7(11): 3907.10.1016/j.matt.2024.07.007 ↗

33. CHEN K, LEI M, YAO Z, et al . Construction of solid-liquid fluorine transport channel to enable highly reversible conversion cathodes. Science Advances , 2021, 7(45): abj1491.10.1126/sciadv.abj1491 ↗

34. WU X, ZHENG Y, LI W, et al . Solid electrolytes reinforced by infinite coordination polymer nano-network for dendrite-free lithium metal batteries. Energy Storage Materials , 2023, 41: 436.10.1016/j.ensm.2021.06.009 ↗

35. HU J, LAI C, CHEN K, et al . Dual fluorination of polymer electrolyte and conversion-type cathode for high-capacity all-solid- state lithium metal batteries. Nature Communications , 2022, 13: 7914.10.1038/s41467-022-35636-0 ↗