Micro-nanoscale Bioactive Glass: Functionalized Design and Angiogenic Skin Regeneration
Source abstract
Abstract
Bioactive glass (BG) is an important class of amorphous inorganic biomaterials, which has been clinically used in hard tissue repair for many years, exhibiting unique tissue repair activity.Recent studies have found that BG also shows effective repair activity in soft tissue, demonstrating significant application potential.Compared with traditional BG, micro-nanoscale bioactive glass (MNBG) has a unique micro-nano structure, which not only retains its excellent chemical composition but also has a larger specific surface area and higher reactivity.These special structures and properties enable MNBG to exhibit significant application potential in promoting vascularization and skin repair/regeneration.This work focuses on the research progress of MNBG in regulating vascularization and skin regeneration, including the abilities of MNBG to promote vascularization and regulate
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (78)
Show source-provided references
1. ZHENG K, TORRE E, BARI A, et al. Antioxidant mesoporous Ce-doped bioactive glass nanoparticles with anti-inflammatory and pro-osteogenic activities. Materials Today Bio, 2020, 5: 100041.10.1016/j.mtbio.2020.100041 ↗
2. SKALLEVOLD H E, ROKAYA D, KHURSHID Z, et al. Bioactive glass applications in dentistry. International Journal of Materials Science, 2019, 20: 5960.10.3390/ijms20235960 ↗
3. MAJUMDAR S, GUPTA S, KRISHNAMURTHY S. Multifarious applications of bioactive glasses in soft tissue engineering. Biomaterials Science, 2021, 9: 8111.10.1039/D1BM01104A ↗
4. HONG Z, REIS R L, MANO J F. Preparation and in vitro characterization of scaffolds of poly(L-lactic acid) containing bioactive glass ceramic nanoparticles. Acta Biomaterialia, 2008, 4: 1297.10.1016/j.actbio.2008.03.007 ↗
5. REZWAN K, CHEN Q Z, BLAKER J J, et al. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2006, 27: 3413.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039 ↗
6. HU Q, JIANG W, LI Y, et al. The effects of morphology on physicochemical properties, bioactivity and biocompatibility of micro-/nano-bioactive glasses. Advanced Powder Technology, 2018, 29: 1812.10.1016/j.apt.2018.04.017 ↗
7. HUANG X L, TENG X, CHEN D, et al. The effect of the shape of mesoporous silica nanoparticles on cellular uptake and cell function. Biomaterials, 2010, 31: 438.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.060 ↗
8. LI H, LI D, WANG X, et al. Progress in biomaterials-enhanced vascularization by modulating physical properties. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 2025, 11: 33.10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01106 ↗
9. ALOUI C, PRIGENT A, SUT C, et al. The signaling role of CD40 ligand in platelet biology and in platelet component transfusion. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2014, 15(12): 22342.10.3390/ijms151222342 ↗
10. CHAKRABARTI S, RIZVI M, MORIN K, et al. The role of CD40L and VEGF in the modulation of angiogenesis and inflammation. Vascular Pharmacology, 2010, 53: 130.10.1016/j.vph.2010.05.003 ↗
11. PHILLIPSON M, KUBES P. The healing power of neutrophils. Trends in Immunology, 2019, 40: 635.10.1016/j.it.2019.05.001 ↗
12. ZHENG K, NIU W, LEI B, et al. Immunomodulatory bioactive glasses for tissue regeneration. Acta Biomaterialia, 2021, 133: 168.10.1016/j.actbio.2021.08.023 ↗
13. MUGHAL A, GILLANI S M H, AHMED S, et al. 3D-printed polyether-ether ketone/carboxymethyl cellulose scaffolds coated with Zn-Mn doped mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2024, 156: 106581.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106581 ↗
14. POLO-MONTALVO A, CASARRUBIOS L, SERRANO M C, et al. Effective actions of ion release from mesoporous bioactive glass and macrophage mediators on the differentiation of osteoprogenitor and endothelial progenitor cells. Pharmaceutics, 2021, 13(8):1152.10.3390/pharmaceutics13081152 ↗
15. VARMETTE E A, NOWALK J R, FLICK L M, et al. Abrogation of the inflammatory response in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 murine macrophages by Zn- and Cu-doped bioactive Sol-Gel glasses. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2009, 90A: 317.10.1002/jbm.a.32098 ↗
16. WANG L, WEI X, WANG Y. Promoting angiogenesis using immune cells for tissue-engineered vascular grafts. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2023, 51: 660.10.1007/s10439-023-03158-5 ↗
17. SOZZANI S, RUSNATI M, RIBOLDI E, et al. Dendritic cell- endothelial cell cross-talk in angiogenesis. Trends in Immunology, 2007, 28: 385.10.1016/j.it.2007.07.006 ↗
18. ZARUBOVA J, HASANI-SADRABADI M M, ARDEHALI R, et al. Immunoengineering strategies to enhance vascularization and tissue regeneration. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2022, 184: 114233.10.1016/j.addr.2022.114233 ↗
19. SOLANKI A K, LALI F V, AUTEFAGE H, et al. Bioactive glasses and electrospun composites that release cobalt to stimulate the HIF pathway for wound healing applications. Biomaterials Research, 2021, 25: 1.10.1186/s40824-020-00202-6 ↗
20. JIANG Y, LI Y, LI J, et al. A mussel-inspired extracellular matrix-mimicking composite scaffold for diabetic wound healing. ACS Applied Bio Materials, 2020, 3: 4052.10.1021/acsabm.0c00143 ↗
21. LI H, CHANG J. Stimulation of proangiogenesis by calcium silicate bioactive ceramic. Acta Biomaterialia, 2013, 9: 5379.10.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.019 ↗
22. DAY R M, BOCCACCINI A R, SHUREY S, et al. Assessment of polyglycolic acid mesh and bioactive glass for soft-tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials, 2004, 25: 5857.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.043 ↗
23. LI R, CLARK A E, HENCH L L. An investigation of bioactive glass powders by Sol-Gel processing. Journal of Applied Biomaterials, 1991, 2: 231.10.1002/jab.770020403 ↗
24. LIN C, MAO C, ZHANG J J, et al. Healing effect of bioactive glass ointment on full-thickness skin wounds. Biomedical Materials, 2012, 7: 045017.10.1088/1748-6041/7/4/045017 ↗
25. LU Y, YANG Y, XIAO L, et al. Autocrine and paracrine effects of vascular endothelial cells promote cutaneous wound healing. BioMed Research International, 2021, 10: 6695663.10.1155/2021/6695663 ↗
26. JIN L, LONG Y, ZHANG Q, et al. MiRNAs regulate cell communication in osteogenesis-angiogenesis coupling during bone regeneration. Molecular Biology Reports, 2023, 50: 8715.10.1007/s11033-023-08709-6 ↗
27. HOPPE A, GÜLDAL N S, BOCCACCINI A R. A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics. Biomaterials, 2011, 32: 2757.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.004 ↗
28. WU C T, ZHOU Y H, XU M C, et al. Copper-containing mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds with multifunctional properties of angiogenesis capacity, osteostimulation and antibacterial activity. Biomaterials, 2013, 34: 422.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.066 ↗
29. WU C T, ZHOU Y H, FAN W, et al. Hypoxia-mimicking mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds with controllable cobalt ion release for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2012, 33: 2076.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.042 ↗
30. PATEL U, MOSS R M, HOSSAIN K M Z, et al. Structural and physico-chemical analysis of calcium/strontium substituted, near-invert phosphate based glasses for biomedical applications. Acta Biomaterialia, 2017, 60: 109.10.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.002 ↗
31. BOCCARDI E, CIRALDO F E, BOCCACCINI A R. Bioactive glass-ceramic scaffolds: processing and properties. MRS Bulletin, 2017, 42: 226.10.1557/mrs.2017.28 ↗
32. LEU A, LEACH J K. Proangiogenic potential of a collagen/ bioactive glass substrate. Pharmaceutical Research, 2008, 25: 1222.10.1007/s11095-007-9508-9 ↗
33. LIN Y, XIAO W, LIU X, et al. Long-term bone regeneration, mineralization and angiogenesis in rat calvarial defects implanted with strong porous bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 2016, 432: 120.10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.04.008 ↗
34. LI Y, CHEN L, CHEN X, et al. High phosphate content in bioactive glasses promotes osteogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Dental Materials, 2021, 37: 272.10.1016/j.dental.2020.11.017 ↗
35. GERHARDT L C, WIDDOWS K L, EROL M M, et al. The pro-angiogenic properties of multi-functional bioactive glass composite scaffolds. Biomaterials, 2011, 32: 4096.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.032 ↗
36. DETSCH R, STOOR P, GRÜNEWALD A, et al. Increase in VEGF secretion from human fibroblast cells by bioactive glass S53P4 to stimulate angiogenesis in bone. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2014, 102: 4055.10.1002/jbm.a.35069 ↗
37. ZHU Y, MA Z, KONG L, et al. Modulation of macrophages by bioactive glass/sodium alginate hydrogel is crucial in skin regeneration enhancement. Biomaterials, 2020, 256: 120216.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120216 ↗
38. SINGER B D, CHANDEL N S. Immunometabolism of pro-repair cells. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 2019, 129: 2597.10.1172/JCI124613 ↗
39. MARTIN P, LEIBOVICH S J. Inflammatory cells during wound repair: the good, the bad and the ugly. Trends Cell Biology, 2005, 15: 599.10.1016/j.tcb.2005.09.002 ↗
40. AHMADI A R, CHICCO M, HUANG J, et al. Stem cells in burn wound healing: a systematic review of the literature. Burns, 2019, 45: 1014.10.1016/j.burns.2018.10.017 ↗
41. WANG S, YANG J, ZHAO G, et al. Current applications of platelet gels in wound healing: a review. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 2021, 29: 370.10.1111/wrr.12896 ↗
42. SUMMERS C, RANKIN S M, CONDLIFFE A M, et al. Neutrophil kinetics in health and disease. Trends in Immunology, 2010, 31: 318.10.1016/j.it.2010.05.006 ↗
43. BURN G L, FOTI A, MARSMAN G, et al. The neutrophil. Immunity, 2021, 54: 1377.10.1016/j.immuni.2021.06.006 ↗
44. BASHIR S, SHARMA Y, ELAHI A, et al. Macrophage polarization: the link between inflammation and related diseases. Inflammatory Research, 2016, 65: 1.10.1007/s00011-015-0874-1 ↗
45. YUNNA C, MENGRU H, LEI W, et al. Macrophage M1/M2 polarization. European Journal of Pharmacology, 2020, 877: 173090.10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173090 ↗
46. SPILLER K L, ANFANG R R, SPILLER K J, et al. The role of macrophage phenotype in vascularization of tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials, 2014, 35: 4477.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.012 ↗
47. GRANEY P L, BEN-SHAUL S, LANDAU S, et al. Macrophages of diverse phenotypes drive vascularization of engineered tissues. Science Advances, 2020, 6: 6391.10.1126/sciadv.aay6391 ↗
48. KREIMENDAHL F, MARQUARDT Y, APEL C, et al. Macrophages significantly enhance wound healing in a vascularized skin model. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2019, 107: 1340.10.1002/jbm.a.36648 ↗
49. YANG M, MA C, LIU S, et al. HIF-dependent induction of adenosine receptor A2b skews human dendritic cells to a Th2-stimulating phenotype under hypoxia. Immunology & Cell Biology, 2010, 88: 165.10.1038/icb.2009.77 ↗
50. BAI W K, ZHANG W, HU B. Vascular endothelial growth factor suppresses dendritic cells function of human prostate cancer. OncoTargets and Therapy, 2018, 11: 1267.10.2147/OTT.S161302 ↗
51. SCHUHLADEN K, STICH L, SCHMIDT J, et al. Cu, Zn doped borate bioactive glasses: antibacterial efficacy and dose-dependent in vitro modulation of murine dendritic cells. Biomaterials Science, 2020, 8: 2143.10.1039/C9BM01691K ↗
52. KWEE B J, BUDINA E, NAJIBI A J, et al. CD4 T-cells regulate angiogenesis and myogenesis. Biomaterials, 2018, 178: 109.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.06.003 ↗
53. RAUSCHENBERGER T, SCHMITT V, AZEEM M, et al. T cells control chemokine secretion by keratinocytes. Frontiers in Immunology, 2019, 10: 1917.10.3389/fimmu.2019.01917 ↗
54. GROME H N, BARNETT L, HAGAR C C, et al. Association of T cell and macrophage activation with arterial vascular health in HIV. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 2016, 33: 181.10.1089/aid.2016.0113 ↗
55. KIM E J, BU S Y, SUNG M K, et al. Analysis of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of silicon in murine macrophages. Biological Trace Element Research, 2013, 156: 329.10.1007/s12011-013-9829-y ↗
56. LIU W, CHEN M, LUO M, et al. Bioactive glass ions hydrogels with antiinflammation antioxidant capacity for treating inflammation- related diseases. Materials & Design, 2023, 227: 111669.10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111669 ↗
57. NIELSEN F H. A novel silicon complex is as effective as sodium metasilicate in enhancing the collagen-induced inflammatory response of silicon-deprived rats. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, 2008, 22: 39.10.1016/j.jtemb.2007.11.004 ↗
58. BIRBEN E, SAHINER U M, SACKESEN C, et al. Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense. World Allergy Organization Journal, 2012, 5: 9.10.1097/WOX.0b013e3182439613 ↗
59. XU W, QIN Z, XU R, et al. Injectable, pro-osteogenic and antioxidant composite microspheres composed of cerium- containing mesoporous bioactive glass and chitosan for bone regeneration applications. Ceramics International, 2023, 49: 25757.10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.05.121 ↗
60. ZHU Y, ZHANG X, CHANG G, et al. Bioactive glass in tissue regeneration: unveiling recent advances in regenerative strategies and applications. Advanced Materials, 2025, 37: 2312964.10.1002/adma.202312964 ↗
61. LOSI P, BRIGANTI E, ERRICO C, et al. Fibrin-based scaffold incorporating VEGF- and bFGF-loaded nanoparticles stimulates wound healing in diabetic mice. Acta Biomaterialia, 2013, 9: 7814.10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.019 ↗
62. FRANK S, HÜBNER G, BREIER G, et al. Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in cultured keratinocytes. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1995, 270: 12607.10.1074/jbc.270.21.12607 ↗
63. EL-FIQI A, ALLAM R, KIM H W. Antioxidant cerium ions- containing mesoporous bioactive glass ultrasmall nanoparticles: structural, physico-chemical, catalase-mimic and biological properties. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2021, 206: 111932.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111932 ↗
64. EBERSBERGER A, SCHAIBLE H G. Do cytokines play a role in the transition from acute to chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pharmacological Research, 2025, 212: 107585.10.1016/j.phrs.2025.107585 ↗
65. MAJUMDAR S, HIRA S K, TRIPATHI H, et al. Synthesis and characterization of barium-doped bioactive glass with potential anti- inflammatory activity. Ceramics International, 2021, 47: 7143.10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.068 ↗
66. JUNG H, LEE H, KIM D, et al. Differential regional vulnerability of the brain to mild neuroinflammation induced by systemic LPS treatment in mice. Journal of Inflammation Research, 2022, 15: 3053.10.2147/JIR.S362006 ↗
67. DUAN Y, ZHENG K, HU W, et al. Anti-inflammatory cerium- containing nano-scaled mesoporous bioactive glass for promoting regenerative capability of dental pulp cells. International Endodontic Journal, 2024, 57: 727.10.1111/iej.14055 ↗
68. KANG Y, LIU K, CHEN Z, et al. Healing with precision: a multi-functional hydrogel-bioactive glass dressing boosts infected wound recovery and enhances neurogenesis in the wound bed. Journal of Controlled Release, 2024, 370: 210.10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.04.034 ↗
69. ZHANG D, LEPPÄRANTA O, MUNUKKA E, et al. Antibacterial effects and dissolution behavior of six bioactive glasses. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2010, 93A: 475.10.1002/jbm.a.32564 ↗
70. ZEHNDER M, WALTIMO T, SENER B, et al. Dentin enhances the effectiveness of bioactive glass S53P4 against a strain of Enterococcus faecalis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontoligy, 2006, 101: 530.10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.03.014 ↗
71. MORTAZAVI V, NAHRKHALAJI M M, FATHI M H, et al. Antibacterial effects of Sol-Gel-derived bioactive glass nanoparticle on aerobic bacteria. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2010, 94A: 160.10.1002/jbm.a.32678 ↗
72. HU G, XIAO L, TONG P, et al. Antibacterial hemostatic dressings with nanoporous bioglass containing silver. International Journal Nanomedicine, 2012; 7: 2613.10.2147/IJN.S31081 ↗
73. HAN X, CHEN Y, JIANG Q, et al. Novel bioactive glass-modified hybrid composite resin: mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and antibacterial and remineralizing activity. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2021, 9: 661734.10.3389/fbioe.2021.661734 ↗
74. ÖZARSLAN A C. Preparation of biosilica glass-based porous scaffolds using various elements (Mg-Zn, Mg-Cu, and Sr-Cu) as bioactive glass co-dopants: in vitro bioactivity and biocompatibility behaviors. Journal of Materials Research, 2023, 38: 3874.10.1557/s43578-023-01105-7 ↗
75. KURTULDU F, KAŇKOVÁ H, BELTRÁN A M, et al. Anti- inflammatory and antibacterial activities of cerium-containing mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles for drug-free biomedical applications. Materials Today Bio, 2021, 12: 100150.10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100150 ↗
76. POP O L, MESAROS A, VODNAR D C, et al. Cerium oxide nanoparticles and their efficient antibacterial application in vitro against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens. Nanomaterials, 2020, 10: 1614.10.3390/nano10081614 ↗
77. MUTLU N, KURTULDU F, UNALAN I, et al. Effect of Zn and Ga doping on bioactivity, degradation, and antibacterial properties of borate 1393-B3 bioactive glass. Ceramics International, 2022, 48: 16404.10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.02.192 ↗
78. LI T, WANG Y, LEI B. Photothermal-antibacterial bioactive noncrystalline nanosystem promotes infected wound tissue regeneration through thermo-ions activation. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2024, 491: 151799.10.1016/j.cej.2024.151799 ↗