Effect of Elastic Strains on Adsorption Energies of C, H and O on Transition Metal Oxides
Source abstract
Abstract
Platinum (Pt)-based noble metal catalysts (PGMs) are the most widely used commercial catalysts, but they have the problems of high cost, low reserves, and susceptibility to small-molecule toxicity.Transition metal oxides (TMOs) are regarded as potential substitutes for PGMs because of their stability in oxidizing environments and excellent catalytic performance.In this study, comprehensive investigation into the influence of elastic strains on the adsorption energies of carbon (C), hydrogen (H) and oxygen (O) on TMOs was conducted.Based on density functional theory (DFT) calculations, these effects in both tetragonal structures (PtO 2 , PdO 2 ) and hexagonal structures (ZnO, CdO), along with their respective transition metals were systematically explored.It was identified that the optimal adsorption sites on metal oxides pinpointed the top of oxygen or the top of metal atom, while face-centered cubic (FCC) and hexagonal close-packed (HCP) holes were preferred for the transition metals.Furthermore, under the influence of elastic strains, the results demonstrated significant disparities in the adsorption energies of H and O between oxides and transition metals.Despite these differences, the effect of elastic strains on the adsorption energies of C, H and O on TMOs mirrored those on transition metals: adsorption energies increased under compressive strains, indicating weaker adsorption, and decreased under tension strains, indicating stronger adsorption.This behavior was rationalized based on the d-band model for adsorption atop a metallic atom or the p-band model for adsorption atop an oxygen atom.Consequently, elastic strains present a promising avenue for tailoring the catalytic properties of TMOs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Industrial Gas Emission Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. KWEON D H, JEON I Y, BAEK J B. Electrochemical catalysts for green hydrogen energy. Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research, 2021, 2(7): 2100019.10.1002/aesr.202100019 ↗
2. GUO J, JIAO S, YA X, et al. Ultrathin Pd‐based perforated nanosheets for fuel cells electrocatalysis. ChemElectroChem, 2022, 9(21): e202200729.10.1002/celc.202200729 ↗
3. WIJAYA D T, LEE C W. Metal-organic framework catalysts: a versatile platform for bioinspired electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 446(3): 138311.10.1016/j.cej.2022.137311 ↗
4. XU H, MA Y, CHEN J, et al. Electrocatalytic reduction of nitrate-a step towards a sustainable nitrogen cycle. Chemical Society Reviews, 2022, 51: 2710.10.1039/D1CS00857A ↗
5. FRYDENDAL R, PAOLI E A, KNUDSEN B P, et al. Benchmarking the stability of oxygen evolution reaction catalysts: the importance of monitoring mass losses. ChemElectroChem, 2014, 1(12): 2075.10.1002/celc.201402262 ↗
6. LEE Y, SUNTIVICH J, MAY K J, et al. Synthesis and activities of rutile IrO2 and RuO2 nanoparticles for oxygen evolution in acid and alkaline solutions. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2012, 3(3): 399.10.1021/jz2016507 ↗
7. WU T, HAN M, ZHU X, et al. The electrochemical corrosion of an air thermally-treated carbon fiber cloth electrocatalyst with outstanding oxygen evolution activity under alkaline conditions. Chemical Communications, 2019, 55(15): 2344.10.1039/C9CC00398C ↗
8. SUEN N T, HUNG S F, QUAN Q, et al. Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: recent development and future perspectives. Chemical Society Reviews, 2017, 46(2): 337.10.1039/C6CS00328A ↗
9. NIE Y, LI L, WEI Z, Recent advancements in Pt and Pt-free catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Chemical Society Reviews, 2015, 44(8): 2168.10.1039/C4CS00484A ↗
10. KULKARNI A, SIAHROSTAMI S, PATEL A, et al. Understanding catalytic activity trends in the oxygen reduction reaction. Chemical Reviews, 2018, 118(5): 2302.10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00488 ↗
11. DOYLE R L, GODWIN I J, BRANDON M P, et al. Redox and electrochemical water splitting catalytic properties of hydrated metal oxide modified electrodes. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2013, 15(33): 13737.10.1039/c3cp51213d ↗
12. LANG R, DU X, HUANG Y, et al. Single-atom catalysts based on the metal-oxide interaction. Chemical Reviews, 2020, 120(21): 11986.10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00797 ↗
13. SUN Y, CHEN G, XI S, et al. Catalytically influential features in transition metal oxides. ACS Catalysis, 2021, 11(22): 13947.10.1021/acscatal.1c04393 ↗
14. KUHLENBECK H, SHAIKHUTDINOV S, FREUND H J. Well- ordered transition metal oxide layers in model catalysis -- a series of case studies. Chemical Reviews, 2013, 113(6): 3986.10.1021/cr300312n ↗
15. XIONG W, YIN H, WU T, et al. Challenges and opportunities of transition metal oxides as electrocatalysts. Chemistry, 2023, 29(5): e202202872.10.1002/chem.202202872 ↗
16. XU L, WANG Z, WANG J, et al. N-doped nanoporous Co3O4 nanosheets with oxygen vacancies as oxygen evolving electrocatalysts. Nanotechnology, 2017, 28(16): 165402.10.1088/1361-6528/aa6381 ↗
17. MOCK S A, SHARP S E, STONER T R, et al. CeO2 nanorods- supported transition metal catalysts for co oxidation. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2016, 466: 261.10.1016/j.jcis.2015.12.026 ↗
18. MEFFORD J T, RONG X, ABAKUMOV A M, et al. Water electrolysis on La1-XSrXCoO3-δ perovskite electrocatalysts. Nature Communication, 2016, 7: 11053.10.1038/ncomms11053 ↗
19. KUANG X, KANG B, WANG Z, et al. Sulfur-doped CoO nanoflakes with loosely packed structure realizing enhanced oxygen evolution reaction. Chemistry, 2018, 24(65): 17288.10.1002/chem.201803302 ↗
20. LUO M, GUO S. Strain-controlled electrocatalysis on multimetallic nanomaterials. Nature Reviews Materials, 2017, 2(11): 17059.10.1038/natrevmats.2017.59 ↗
21. KHORSHIDI A, VIOLET J, HASHEMI J, et al. How strain can break the scaling relations of catalysis. Nature Catalysis, 2018, 1(4): 263.10.1038/s41929-018-0054-0 ↗
22. JIAO Y, ZHENG Y, JARONIEC M, et al. Design of electrocatalysts for oxygen- and hydrogen-involving energy conversion reactions. Chemical Society Reviews, 2015, 44(8): 2060.10.1039/C4CS00470A ↗
23. ESCUDERO-ESCRIBANO, MALACRIDA M P, HANSEN M H, et al. Tuning the activity of Pt alloy electrocatalysts by means of the lanthanide contraction. Science, 2016, 352(6281): 73.10.1126/science.aad8892 ↗
24. AMAKAWA K, SUN L, GUO C, et al. How strain affects the reactivity of surface metal oxide catalysts. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2013, 52(51): 13553.10.1002/anie.201306620 ↗
25. LING T, YAN D Y, WANG H, et al. Activating cobalt(II) oxide nanorods for efficient electrocatalysis by strain engineering. Nature Communication, 2017, 8: 1509.10.1038/s41467-017-01872-y ↗
26. NØRSKOV J K, BLIGAARD T, LOGADOTTIR A, et al. Trends in the exchange current for hydrogen evolution. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2005, 152(3): J23.10.1149/1.1856988 ↗
27. MARTÍNEZ-ALONSO C, GUEVARA-VELA J M, JAVIER L L. Understanding the effect of mechanical strains on the catalytic activity of transition metals. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2022, 24(8): 4832.10.1039/D1CP05436H ↗
28. MARTÍNEZ-ALONSO C, GUEVARA-VELA J M, JAVIER L L. The effect of elastic strains on the adsorption energy of H, O, and OH in transition metals. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2021, 23(37): 21295.10.1039/D1CP03312C ↗
29. BAHN S R, JACOBS K W. An object-oriented scripting interface to a legacy electronic structure code. Computing in Science & Engineering, 2002, 4(3): 56.10.1109/5992.998641 ↗
30. JAIN A, ONG S P, HAUTIER G, et al. Commentary: the materials project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Materials, 2013, 1(1): 011002.10.1063/1.4812323 ↗
31. GIANNOZZI P, BARONI S, BONINI N, et al. Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2009, 21(39): 395502.10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 ↗
32. PERDEW J P, BURKE K, ERNZERHOF M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical Review Letters, 1996, 50(24): 308.10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
33. TANG W, SANVILLE E, HENKELMAN G. A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2009, 21(8): 084204.10.1088/0953-8984/21/8/084204 ↗
34. SANVILLE E, KENNY S D, SMITH R, et al. Improved grid- based algorithm for Bader charge allocation. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 2007, 28(5): 899.10.1002/jcc.20575 ↗
35. HENKELMAN G, ARNALDSSON A, JÓNSSON H. A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density. Computational Materials Science, 2006, 36(3): 354.10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 ↗
36. HAN J, SUN H, SHI T, et al. Rationalization of nonlinear adsorption energy-strain relations and Bronsted-Evans-Polanyi and transition state scaling relationships under strain. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2021, 12(47): 11578.10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02960 ↗
37. HAMMER B N, NØRSKOV J K. Electronic factors determining the reactivity of metal surfaces. Surface Science, 1995, 343: 211.10.1016/0039-6028(96)80007-0 ↗
38. HAMMER B N, NØRSKOV J K. Why gold is the noblest of all the metals. Nature, 1995, 376(20): 238.10.1038/376238a0 ↗
39. MAVRIKAKIS M, HAMMER B N, NØRSKOV J K. Effect of strain on the reactivity of metal surfaces. Physical Review B, 1998, 81(13): 2819.10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2819 ↗
40. PANG Q, ZHANG Y, ZHANG J M, et al. Structural and electronic properties of atomic oxygen adsorption on Pt(111): a density-functional theory study. Applied Surface Science, 2011, 257(7): 3047.10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.114 ↗
41. KATTEL S, WANG G. Beneficial compressive strain for oxygen reduction reaction on Pt (111) surface. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2014, 141(12): 124713.10.1063/1.4896604 ↗
42. JACOBS R, HWANG J, SHAO-HORN Y, et al. Assessing correlations of perovskite catalytic performance with electronic structure descriptors. Chemistry of Materials, 2019, 31(3): 785.10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03840 ↗
43. DEMAISON J, CSÁSZÁR A G. Equilibrium Co bond lengths. Journal of Molecular Structure, 2012, 1023: 7.10.1016/j.molstruc.2012.01.030 ↗