Validation of a multimodal set‐up for the study of zirconium alloys claddings' behaviour under simulated LOCA conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In a previous paper, Campello et al. presented a combined experimental/numerical approach to identify the creep behaviour of as‐fabricated Zircaloy‐4 claddings under simulated LOCA conditions. The current paper deals with the uncertainties and errors estimation of the two key methods used to measure the thermal and kinematic full fields during the creep tests: near infrared thermography (NIRT) and two‐dimensional digital image correlation (2D‐DIC). The NIRT uncertainties are evaluated as 0.7% of the actual temperature. They are mainly due to the thermocouple measurements used to calibrate the radiometric model of the NIRT. A combined 2D‐DIC/edge detection approach is proposed to quantify the error related to 2D‐DIC when measuring the ballooning of the tubular specimen. The 2D‐DIC error is evaluated as 0.1% of the actual equivalent strain even for ballooning inducing a radius increase of 20%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
INSA‐Lyon, CNRS UMR5259, LaMCoS University of Lyon Lyon F‐69621 France
IRSN/PSN‐RES/SEREX/LE2M Saint‐Paul‐lez‐Durance France
Research Institute in Civil and Mechanical Engineering (GeM, UMR 6183 CNRS) Ecole Centrale de Nantes 1 rue de la Noë Nantes France
Univ. Bourgogne Franche‐Comté FEMTO‐ST Institute CNRS/UFC/ENSMM/UTBM Department of Applied Mechanics 25000 BESANÇON‐FR
Funding
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. G.Repetto C.Dominguez B.Durville S.Carnemolla D.Campello N.Tardif M.Gradeck 16th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal hydraulics.2015.
2. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.03.01610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.03.016 ↗
3. 10.1080/18811248.2004.971553910.1080/18811248.2004.9715539 ↗
4. C.Bushy K.Marsh Tech. Rep. Colorado Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit 1974.
5. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.05.04610.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.05.046 ↗
6. H. E.Rosinger P. C.Bera W. R.Ciendening Tech Rep Atomic Energy of Canada Limited 1978.
7. Réocreux M. · NED · 1990 · 124 · 363
8. 10.1007/BF0333820110.1007/BF03338201 ↗
9. Kim J. H. · NED · 2004 · 234 · 157
10. 10.1016/0262-8856(83)90064-110.1016/0262-8856(83)90064-1 ↗
11. 10.1007/BF0232509210.1007/BF02325092 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.06.01810.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.06.018 ↗
13. 10.1007/s11340-006-9824-810.1007/s11340-006-9824-8 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cma.2007.06.01910.1016/j.cma.2007.06.019 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.crme.2005.11.00210.1016/j.crme.2005.11.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/0020-7683(71)90015-110.1016/0020-7683(71)90015-1 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.09.00210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.09.002 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11340-011-9483-210.1007/s11340-011-9483-2 ↗
19. Chrysochoos A. · JSA · 2008 · 43 · 411
20. 10.1117/1.60110910.1117/1.601109 ↗
21. Saunders P. · TEMPMEKO · 37 · 329
22. 10.1109/TIM.2003.80910310.1109/TIM.2003.809103 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.imavis.2006.04.01910.1016/j.imavis.2006.04.019 ↗
24. Saunders P. · HTHP · 1989 · 31 · 8310.1068/htrt140 ↗
25. Tardif N. · NED · 2011 · 241 · 755
26. 10.1088/0957-0233/22/1/01570110.1088/0957-0233/22/1/015701 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2011.06.01910.1016/j.optlastec.2011.06.019 ↗
28. 10.3166/qirt.3.93-11510.3166/qirt.3.93-115 ↗
29. Y.Rotrou Ph.D. thesis Ecole nationale supérieure de l'aéronautique et de l'espace 2006.
30. 10.1002/nme.290810.1002/nme.2908 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2014.01.00910.1016/j.optlaseng.2014.01.009 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.05.00510.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.05.005 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.07.02510.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.07.025 ↗