journal article·2026-04Open access

Damage Localisation Using a Displacement–Strain Expansion Process

Brett Daniels, Alessandro Sabato, Peter Avitabile

Strain· Volume 62· Issue 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Identification of damage using dynamic measurements has been a continued area of research. Defects or damaged regions within a structure can result in an apparent change to the dynamic response of the system. Typical damage detection methods use changes in displacement responses as an indication of damage. However, displacement is relatively insensitive to minor structural variations. Strain‐based damage detection methods are more sensitive to minor structural variations but regularly suffer from poor resolution, which hinders their detection capabilities. To improve on the damage detection process, a strain‐based technique has been developed that uses full‐field data obtained via displacement–strain expansion from a sparse set of measurement points. This expansion method incorporates both strain‐based mode shapes and displacement‐based mode shapes obtained from either a finite element model (FEM) or experimental modal data. In this work, two laboratory structures with a localised structural modification are excited to obtain sparse displacement and strain response measurements. Sparse test measurements are then used to obtain the full‐field strain response, which is compared with the simulated strain response of an undamaged structure subjected to an equivalent excitation. Differences between the damaged and undamaged strain responses are then analysed in the time domain to identify and locate damage within the structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Optical measurement and interference techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Structural Dynamics and Acoustic Systems Laboratory University of Massachusetts Lowell Lowell Massachusetts USA

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.2172/20181010.2172/201810 ↗
2. 10.1098/rsta.2000.071710.1098/rsta.2000.0717 ↗
3. 10.1177/147592170607206210.1177/1475921706072062 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.01810.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.018 ↗
5. 10.1088/1742‐6596/524/1/01206410.1088/1742‐6596/524/1/012064 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jsv.2018.01.05010.1016/j.jsv.2018.01.050 ↗
7. 10.1520/STP32306S10.1520/STP32306S ↗
8. 10.1243/jmes_jour_1978_020_016_0210.1243/jmes_jour_1978_020_016_02 ↗
9. 10.1243/03093247V14204910.1243/03093247V142049 ↗
10. F. D.JuandM.Mimovich “Modal Frequency Method in Diagnosis of Fracture Damage in Structures ” In Proc. 4th International Modal Analysis Conference (1986).
11. 10.1115/1.326955010.1115/1.3269550 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0232899310.1007/BF02328993 ↗
13. W. M.West “Illustration of the Use of Modal Assurance Criterion to Detect Structural Changes in an Orbiter Test Specimen ” In Proc. Air Force Conference on Aircraft Structural Integrity (1984): 1–6.
14. 10.1016/0022‐460x(85)90423‐710.1016/0022‐460x(85)90423‐7 ↗
15. 10.1016/0022‐460x(90)90593‐o10.1016/0022‐460x(90)90593‐o ↗
16. C. H. J.Fox “The Location of Defects in Structures—a Comparison of the Use of Natural Frequency and Mode Shape Data ” In Proc. 10th International Modal Analysis Conference (1992): 522–528.
17. R.Mayes “Error Localization using Mode Shapes—an Application to a Two Link Robot Arm ” In Proc. 10th International Modal Analysis Conference (1992): 886–891.
18. 10.1016/0022‐460x(91)90595‐b10.1016/0022‐460x(91)90595‐b ↗
19. N.Stubbs J.Kim andK.Topole “An Efficient and Robust Algorithm for Damage Localization in Offshore Platforms ” In Proceedings of the ASCE 10th structures congress 1 (1992): 543–546.
20. N.Stubbs J. T.Kim andC. R.Farrar “Field Verification of a Nondestructive Damage Localization and Severity Estimation Algorithm ” In Proc. 13th International Modal Analysis Conference (1995): 210–218.
21. 10.1006/jsvi.1999.216310.1006/jsvi.1999.2163 ↗
22. 10.1006/jsvi.1998.187810.1006/jsvi.1998.1878 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.11.01010.1016/j.ymssp.2011.11.010 ↗
24. 10.1080/10168664.2018.150760710.1080/10168664.2018.1507607 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.09.01610.1016/j.engstruct.2006.09.016 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.09.03310.1016/j.ymssp.2017.09.033 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.05.03110.1016/j.ymssp.2014.05.031 ↗
28. N. M.Maia J. M.Silva andR. P.Sampaio “Localization of damage using curvature of the frequency‐response‐functions ” In Proc. 15th Internation Modal Analysis Conference (1997).
29. 10.1006/jsvi.1999.234010.1006/jsvi.1999.2340 ↗
30. 10.1006/mssp.2002.150610.1006/mssp.2002.1506 ↗
31. J. G.Ruddock “A Damage Detection Method Based on Time Series Dynamic Strain Distributions Expanded From Limited Sets of Measured Data ” Master's Thesis Mechanical Engineering University of Massachusetts Lowell Lowell MA (2017).
32. J.O'Callahan P.Avitabile andR.Riemer “System Equivalent Reduction Expansion Process (SEREP) ” In Proc. 7th International Modal Analysis Conference (1989).
33. 10.3233/SAV‐2012‐068610.3233/SAV‐2012‐0686 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.04.02610.1016/j.jsv.2015.04.026 ↗
35. 10.1115/1.403272110.1115/1.4032721 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.08.02310.1016/j.ymssp.2017.08.023 ↗
37. N.OkuboandK.Yamaguchi “Prediction of Dynamic Strain Distribution Under Operating Condition by Use of Modal Analysis ” In Proc. 13th International Modal Analysis Conference 2460 (1995): 91–96.
38. 10.1007/s11465‐022‐0731‐110.1007/s11465‐022‐0731‐1 ↗
39. J. C.O'Callahan P.Avitabile andR. K.Leung “Development of Mass and Stiffness Matrices for an Analytical Model Using Experimental Modal Data ” In Proc. 2nd International Modal Analysis Conference Orlando FL (1984).
40. J. C.O'CallahanandR. K.Leung “Optimization of Mass and Stiffness Matrices Using a Generalized Inverse Technique on the Measured Modes ” In Proc. 3rd International Modal Analysis Conference Orlando FL (1985): 75–79.
41. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943‐7889.000142210.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943‐7889.0001422 ↗
42. 10.1504/IJVNV.2004.00407610.1504/IJVNV.2004.004076 ↗
43. 10.1504/IJVNV.2005.00752910.1504/IJVNV.2005.007529 ↗
44. PONTOS v. 6.3 User's Manual GOM mbH Braunschweig Germany.
45. ARAMIS v. 6.3 User's Manual GOM mbH Braunschweig Germany.
46. CADA‐X Modal & Test.Lab Software Leuven Measurement Systems Leuven Belgium.
47. NASTRAN NEi Software Westminster CA.
48. FEMAP 2. UGS Corporation Piano TX (2020).