Heteroatom-doped Biochar for Direct Dehydrogenation of Propane to Propylene
Source abstract
Abstract
Carbon materials have been widely used in various catalytic reactions due to their excellent properties, such as low cost and good chemical/thermal stability. In this study, nitrogen-doped, boron-doped, and boron-nitrogen co-doped biochars were prepared by in-situ gas-phase doping strategy using natural absorbent cotton as the raw materials. In the reaction of direct dehydrogenation of propane to propylene, the heteroatom-doped biochar showed higher propane conversion and propylene selectivity than the undoped biochar. It was also found that the catalytic performance of nitrogen and boron independently doped biochar was better than that of boron and nitrogen co-doped 10 , : 1059 biochar. The nitrogen-doped biochar exhibited the best catalytic performance that, at the reaction temperature of 600 , the propane conversion reached 17.6% and the olefins yield was 14.8%. After dehydrogenation reaction for 12 h, the catalyst's performance exhibited no apparent declination. The characterization results revealed that nitrogen doping and boron doping in biochars could transform many C-O groups on the surface of biochar into C=O groups at an advantage of propane dehydrogenation activity, which inhibits the C-C bond breaking in the reaction process and improves the selectivity of propylene. Furthermore, due to biochars rich in resources and low cost, they would promote the industrialization of direct dehydrogenation of propane.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. SATTLER J J H B, JAVIER RM, ELDVARDO S J, et al. Catalytic Dehydrogenation of light alkanes on Metals and metal oxides. Chemical Reviews, 2014, 114(20): 10613-10653.10.1021/cr5002436 ↗
2. CAVANI F, BALLARINI N, CERICOLA A. Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane and propane: how far from commercial implementation? Catalysis Today, 2007, 127(1): 113-131.10.1016/j.cattod.2007.05.009 ↗
3. ZHAO Z, GE G, LI W, et al. Modulating the microstructure and surface chemistry of carbocatalysts for oxidative and direct dehydrogenation: a review. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2016, 37(5): 644-670.10.1016/S1872-2067(15)61065-8 ↗
4. WECKHUYSEN B M, SCHOONHEYDT R A. Alkane dehydrogenation over supported chromium oxide catalysts. Catalysis Today, 1999, 51(2): 223-232.10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00047-4 ↗
5. PHAM H N, SATTLER J J H B, WECKHUYSEN B M, et al. Role of Sn in the regeneration of Pt/γ-Al2O3 light alkane dehydrogenation catalysts. ACS Catalysis, 2016, 6(4): 2257-2264.10.1021/acscatal.5b02917 ↗
6. MOTAGAMWALA A H, ALMALLAHI R, WORTMAN J, et al. Stable and selective catalysts for propane dehydrogenation operating at thermodynamic limit. Science, 2021, 373(6551): 217-222.10.1126/science.abg7894 ↗
7. HU Z P, ZHANG L F, WANG Z, et al. Bean dregs-derived hierarchical porous carbons as metal-free catalysts for efficient dehydrogenation of propane to propylene. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2018, 93(12): 3410-3417.10.1002/jctb.5698 ↗
8. PARAKNOWITSCH J P, THOMAS A. Doping carbons beyond nitrogen: an overview of advanced heteroatom doped carbons with boron, sulphur and phosphorus for energy applications. Energy & Environmental Science, 2013, 6(10): 2839-2855.10.1039/c3ee41444b ↗
9. SHENG J, YAN B, LU W D, et al. Oxidative dehydrogenation of light alkanes to olefins on metal-free catalysts. Chemical Society Reviews, 2021, 50(2): 1438-1468.10.1039/D0CS01174F ↗
10. FRANK B, ZHANG J, BLUME R, et al. Heteroatoms increase the selectivity in oxidative dehydrogenation reactions on nanocarbons. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2009, 48(37): 6913-6917.10.1002/anie.200901826 ↗
11. LIU L, DENG Q F, AGULA B, et al. Ordered mesoporous carbon catalyst for dehydrogenation of propane to propylene. Chemicial Communications, 2011, 47(29): 8334-8336.10.1039/c1cc12806j ↗
12. SONG Y, LIU G, YUAN Z Y. N-, P- and B-doped mesoporous carbons for direct dehydrogenation of propane. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(97): 94636-94642.10.1039/C6RA20726J ↗
13. SÁNCHEZ-MONEDERO M A, SÁNCHEZ-GARCíA M, ALBURQUERQUE J A, et al. Biochar reduces volatile organic compounds generated during chicken manure composting. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 288: 121584.10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121584 ↗
14. LIU W J, JIANG H, YU H Q. Emerging applications of biochar- based materials for energy storage and conversion. Energy & Environmental Science, 2019, 12(6): 1751-1779.10.1039/C9EE00206E ↗
15. DE JESÚS DÍAZ VELÁSQUEZ J, SUÁREZ L M C, FIGUEIREDO J L. Oxidative dehydrogenation of isobutane overactivated carbon catalysts. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2006, 311: 51-57.10.1016/j.apcata.2006.06.001 ↗
16. LI L, ZHONG Q, KIM N D, et al. Nitrogen-doped carbonized cotton for highly flexible supercapacitors. Carbon, 2016, 105: 260-267.10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.031 ↗
17. KIM N D, KIM S J, KIM G P, et al. NH3-activated polyaniline for use as a high performance electrode material in supercapacitors. Electrochimica Acta, 2012, 78: 340-346.10.1016/j.electacta.2012.06.025 ↗
18. DAI P, XUE Y, ZHANG S, et al. Paper-derived flexible 3D interconnected carbon microfiber networks with controllable pore sizes for supercapacitors. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, 10(43): 37046-37056.10.1021/acsami.8b13281 ↗
19. CHHETRI M, MAITRA S, CHAKRABORTY H, et al. Superior performance of borocarbonitrides, BxCyNz, as stable, low-cost metal-free electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Energy & Environmental Science, 2016, 9(1): 95-101.10.1039/C5EE02521D ↗
20. LI Y T, Pi Y T, LU L M, et al. Hierarchical porous active carbon from fallen leaves by synergy of K2CO3 and their supercapacitor performance. Journal of Power Sources, 2015, 299: 519-528.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.039 ↗
21. MACHAKA R, ERASMUS R M, DERRY T E. Formation of c-BN nanocrystals by He+ implantation into hBN. Diamond and Related Materials, 2010, 19(10): 1131-1134.10.1016/j.diamond.2010.04.001 ↗
22. CHEN D, HOLMEN A, SUI Z, et al. Carbon mediated catalysis: a review on oxidative dehydrogenation. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2014, 35(6): 824-841.10.1016/S1872-2067(14)60120-0 ↗
23. ZHAO Y, YANG L, CHEN S, et al. Can boron and nitrogen co-doping improve oxygen reduction reaction activity of carbon nanotubes? Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013, 135(4): 1201-1204.10.1021/ja310566z ↗
24. SANTHOSH KUMAR M, HAMMER N, RØNNING M, et al. The nature of active chromium species in Cr-catalysts for dehydrogenation of propane: New insights by a comprehensive spectroscopic study. Journal of Catalysis, 2009, 261(1): 116-128.10.1016/j.jcat.2008.11.014 ↗
25. LI H, ZHOU S, ZHOU Y, et al. Effect of strontium addition to Plat inum catalyst for propane dehydrogenation. China Petroleum Processing & Petrochemical Technology, 2012, 14(3): 75-82.