Experimental study on flexural behavior of splicing concrete-filled GFRP tubular composite members connected with steel bars
Source abstract
Abstract
Based on the experiment, this paper focuses on studying flexural behavior of splicing concrete-filled glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) tubular composite members connected with steel bars. The test results indicated the confinement effects of GFRP tubes on the concrete core in compression zone began to produce, when the load reached about 50%Pu (Pu-ultimate load), but the confinement effects in tensile zone was unobvious. In addition, the failure modes of composite members were influenced by the steel ratio of the joint. For splicing unreinforced composite members, the steel ratio more than 1.96% could satisfy the splicing requirements and the steel ratio 2.94% was ideal comparatively. For splicing reinforced specimen, the bearing capacity of specimen with 3.92% steel ratio was higher 21.4% than specimen with 2.94% steel ratio and the latter was higher 21.2% than the contrast non-splicing specimen, which indicated that the steel ratio more than 2.94% could satisfy the splicing requirements and both splicing ways used in the experiment were feasible. So, the optimal steel ratio 2.94% was suggested economically. The experimental results also indicated that the carrying capacity and ductility of splicing concrete-filled GFRP tubular composite members could be improved by setting internal longitudinal rebars.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI Struct. J. · 2006 · 103 · 339
2. J. Northeast. Univ. (Natural Science) · 2010 · 31 · 1495
3. J. Struct. Eng · 2005 · 131 · 142610.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:9(1426) ↗
4. J. Compos. Construct. · 2006 · 10 · 16110.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:2(161) ↗
5. J. Struct. Eng. · 2001 · 127 · 81010.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:7(810) ↗
6. J. Compos. Construct. · 2002 · 6 · 12310.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(123) ↗
7. J. Compos. Construct. · 2004 · 8 · 34110.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:4(341) ↗
8. J. Compos. Construct. · 2009 · 13 · 29210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000013 ↗
9. J. Compos. Construct. · 2011 · 15 · 85010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000217 ↗
10. J. Compos. Construct. · 2004 · 8 · 53910.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:6(539) ↗
11. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. (Materials Srcience) · 2010 · 25 · 45410.1007/s11595-010-0022-2 ↗
12. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. · 2010 · 29 · 217010.1177/0731684409344652 ↗
13. ACI Struct. J. · 2005 · 102 · 258
14. Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J. · 2009 · 9 · 56910.12989/scs.2009.9.6.569 ↗
15. J. Struct. Eng. · 1999 · 125 · 108510.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:10(1085) ↗
16. J. Compos. Construct. · 2002 · 6 · 23310.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:4(233) ↗
17. Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J · 2012 · 12 · 14910.12989/scs.2012.12.2.149 ↗
18. ACT Struct. J. · 1994 · 91 · 434
19. J. Struct. Eng. · 2007 · 133 · 82510.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:6(825) ↗
20. J. Compos. Construct. · 2006 · 10 · 35710.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:4(357) ↗
21. J. Compos. Construct. · 2005 · 9 · 26310.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:3(263) ↗
22. Ind. Construct. (supplement) · 2009 · 39 · 262
23. Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J · 2011 · 11 · 45510.12989/scs.2011.11.6.455 ↗
24. J. Struct. Eng · 2003 · 129 · 72510.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:6(725) ↗
25. Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J. · 2012 · 13 · 4710.12989/scs.2012.13.1.047 ↗
26. J. Compos. Construct. · 2006 · 10 · 44310.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:5(443) ↗
27. J. Compos. Construct. · 2006 · 10 · 34510.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:4(345) ↗