journal article·2006-05

Stress evolution during growth of bilayer self-assembled InAs/GaAs quantum dots

D.M. Schaadt, S. Krauss, R. Koch, K.H. Ploog

Applied Physics A· Volume 83· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

We investigated the stress evolution during molecular-beam epitaxy of bilayer InAs/GaAs(001) quantum dot (QD) structures in real time and with sub-monolayer precision using an in-situ cantilever beam setup. During growth of the InAs at 470 °C a stress of 5.1 GPa develops in the wetting layer, in good agreement with the theoretical misfit stress. At a critical thickness of 1.5 monolayers the strain is relieved by the QD formation. In the case of InAs/GaAs bilayer structures, the second InAs layer grows identical to the first for GaAs spacer thicknesses exceeding ∼13 nm. For thinner spacers the critical thickness for the 2D/3D transition in the second layer decreases. The stress of the second InAs layer does not reach the value of the first, indicating that InAs QDs grow on partially strained areas due to the strain field of the previous InAs layer.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Xie Q, Madhukar A, Cheng P, Kobayashi N (1995) Phys. Rev. Lett. 75:254210.1103/PhysRevLett.75.2542 ↗
2. Nakata Y, Sugiyama Y, Futatsugi T, Yokoyama N (1997) J. Cryst. Growth 175–176:71310.1016/S0022-0248(96)00814-7 ↗
3. Joyce PB, Krzyzewski TJ, Steans PH, Bell GR, Neave JH, Jones TS (2002) J. Cryst. Growth 244:3910.1016/S0022-0248(02)01607-X ↗
4. Ledentsov NN, Shchukin VA, Grundmann M, Kirstaedter N, Böhrer J, Schmidt O, Bimberg D, Ustinov VM, Egorov AY, Zhukov AE, Kop’ev PS, Zaitsev SV, Gordeev NY, Alferov ZI, Borovkov AI, Kosogov AO, Ruvimov SS, Werner P, Gösele U, Heydenreich J (1996) Phys. Rev. B 54:874310.1103/PhysRevB.54.8743 ↗
5. Shin H, Lee W, Yoo Y-H (2003) Nanotechnology 14:74210.1088/0957-4484/14/7/309 ↗
6. Shin H, Yoo Y-H, Lee W (2003) J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36:261210.1088/0022-3727/36/21/003 ↗
7. Fuster D, González MU, González L, González Y, Ben T, Ponce A, Molina SI (2004) Appl. Phys. Lett. 84:472310.1063/1.1759374 ↗
8. Stoney GG (1909) Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 32:17210.1098/rspa.1909.0021 ↗
9. Brandt O, Waltereit P, Ploog KH (2002) J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35:57710.1088/0022-3727/35/7/301 ↗
10. Joyce PB, Krzyzewski TJ, Steans PH, Bell GR, Neave JH, Jones TS (2001) Surf. Sci. 492:34510.1016/S0039-6028(01)01479-0 ↗
11. Brounkov PN, Polimeni A, Stoddart ST, Henini M, Eaves L, Main PC, Kovsh AR, Musikhin YG, Konnikov SG (1998) Appl. Phys. Lett. 73:109210.1063/1.122094 ↗
12. García JM, Silveira JP, Briones F (2000) Appl. Phys. Lett. 77:40910.1063/1.126992 ↗
13. Schell-Sorokin AJ, Tromp RM (1990) Phys. Rev. Lett. 64:1030
14. Wedler G, Walz J, Hesjedal T, Chilla E, Koch R (1998) Phys. Rev. Lett. 80
15. Walz J, Greuer A, Wedler G, Hesjedal T, Chilla E, Koch R (1998) Appl. Phys. Lett. 73:257910.1063/1.122511 ↗
16. Rodríguez BP, Millunchick JM (2004) J. Cryst. Growth 264:6410.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.12.053 ↗
17. Das AK, Pampuch C, Ney A, Hesjedal T, Däweritz L, Koch R, Ploog KH (2003) Phys. Rev. Lett. 91:08720310.1103/PhysRevLett.91.087203 ↗
18. Johnson MD, Orme C, Hunt AW, Graff D, Sudijono J, Sander LM, Orr BG (1994) Phys. Rev. Lett. 72:11610.1103/PhysRevLett.72.116 ↗
19. Apostolopoulos G, Herfort J, Däweritz L, Ploog KH, Luysberg M (2000) Phys. Rev. Lett. 84:335810.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3358 ↗
20. Nagashima A, Tazima M, Nishimura A, Takagi Y, Yoshino J (2002) Surf. Sci. 514:35010.1016/S0039-6028(02)01652-7 ↗