journal article·2022Open access

Direct Ink Writing of Gypsum: Developing a Printable Gypsum Paste

Hongli ZHOU, Zhiyong CAI, Xiaofeng WANG, Jin ZENG, Yan FENG, Chaoqun PENG, Richu WANG

Journal of Inorganic Materials· Volume 37· Issue 3

Abstract

Gypsum is a common material for statues, building, and casting molds (alloys and ceramics). Due to the incomplete hydration reaction between water and gypsum, it is difficult to print high-strength gypsum products using 3D printing techniques such as Binder Jetting. To enhance its strength, the hydration reaction should be completely performed, which could be fulfilled by direct ink writing (DIW). However, the reaction in the gypsum paste for DIW is so fast that less time is left for operating a 3D printer. In this work, a printable gypsum paste with a reasonable setting time was developed to print 3D gypsum structures via direct ink writing. A retarder and a thickener were introduced into the paste to prolong its setting time for operating and tailor its rheological property for printing, respectively. The setting time, expansion and rheological properties of the pastes were tested by the Vicat apparatus, consistometer and rheometer, respectively. The results show that citric acid (CA) is a suitable retarder, although decreases its compressive strength due to the directional grown gypsum crystals resulting from the selective adsorption of CA on gypsum powder, while hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) is an acceptable thickener, which affects forming flocculation structure in the paste, resulting in higher viscosity and shear modulus.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · BIM and Construction Integration

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. ZHANG J X, ZHANG Y, LIU J K, et al. Research on the properties of high-strength gypsum based tile adhesive in interior decoration. E3S Web of Conferences, 2020, 165(5): 05015.10.1051/e3sconf/202016505015 ↗
2. PHONGTHORN J, PANUWAT J. Utilization of several industrial wastes as raw material for calcium sulfoaluminate cement. Materials, 2019, 12(20): 3319-3331.10.3390/ma12203319 ↗
3. PHETRATTANARANGSI T, PUNCREOBUTR C, KHAMKONGKAEO A, et al. The behavior of gypsum-bonded investment in the gold jewelry casting process. Thermochimica Acta, 2017, 657: 144-150.10.1016/j.tca.2017.09.008 ↗
4. WEISE J, HILBERS J, HANDELS F, et al. New core technology for light metal casting. Advanced Engineering Materials, 2019, 21(4): 1800608.10.1002/adem.201800608 ↗
5. MA CHANGLIANG, ZHANG YUE, ZHANG HUANYUE, et al. Manufacturing of herringbone gear model by 3D printing assisted investment casting. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 332(4): 042045.10.1088/1755-1315/332/4/042045 ↗
6. MA Y, TANG B, YAO Q M, et al. Common defects and their solutions in plaster investment precision casting. Special Casting, 2020, 41(7): 664-666.
7. SHEN Y, ZHENG G, FENG C M. Research progress in investment casting precision casting technology. Precision Forming Engineering, 2019(01): 54-62.
8. HEAD D, VANORIO T. Effects of changes in rock microstructures on permeability: 3-D printing investigation. Geophysical Research Letters, 2016, 43(14): 7494-7502.10.1002/2016GL069334 ↗
9. LIGON S C, LISKA R, STAMPFL J, et al. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chemical Reviews, 2017, 117(15): 10212-10290.10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 ↗
10. AMBROSI A, PUMERA M. 3D-printing technologies for electrochemical applications. Chemical Society Reviews, 2016, 45(10): 2740-2755.10.1039/C5CS00714C ↗
11. HISHAM H H, ARIFIN S S, AYA A, et al. 3D printable conductive materials for the fabrication of electrochemical sensors: a mini review. Electrochemistry Communications, 2018, 96: 27-31.10.1016/j.elecom.2018.09.006 ↗
12. CIMA M, LEXINGTON, SACHS E M, et al. Three-dimensional Printing Techniques. U.S., Patent, 5387380, 1995.2.7.
13. CASTILHO M, RODRIGUES J, PIRES I, et al. Fabrication of individual alginate-TCP scaffolds for bone tissue engineering by means of powder printing. Biofabrication, 2015, 7(1): 15004-15023.10.1088/1758-5090/7/1/015004 ↗
14. JARIWALA S H, LEWIS G S, BUSHMAN Z J, et al. 3D printing of personalized artificial bone scaffolds. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 2015, 2(2): 56-64.10.1089/3dp.2015.0001 ↗
15. SNYDER T J, ANDREWS M, WEISLOGEL M, et al. 3D systems' technology overview and new applications in manufacturing, engineering, science, and education. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 2014, 1(3): 169-176.10.1089/3dp.2014.1502 ↗
16. LIU H B, MENG F J, HUA S Z. 4D mapping of the fracture evolution in a printed gypsum-like core by using X-ray CT scanning. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 2021: 1-12.10.1155/2021/8820828 ↗
17. SONG R, WANG Y, ISHUTOV S, et al. A comprehensive experimental study on mechanical behavior, microstructure and transport properties of 3D-printed rock analogs. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2020, 53(12): 5745-5765.10.1007/s00603-020-02239-4 ↗
18. JAVAN R, ELLENBOGEN A L, GREEK N, et al. A prototype assembled 3D-printed phantom of the glenohumeral joint for fluoroscopic-guided shoulder arthrography. Skeletal Radiology, 2019, 48(5): 791-802.10.1007/s00256-018-2979-4 ↗
19. BUDA M, BRATOS M, SORENSEN J A. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2018, 120(6): 913-918.10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.011 ↗
20. RODRÍGUEZ-GONZÁLEZ P, FERNÁNDEZ-ABIA A I, CASTRO- SASTRE M A, et al. Heat treatments for improved quality binder jetted molds for casting aluminum alloys. Additive Manufacturing, 2020, 36: 101524.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101524 ↗
21. WU Z J, ZHANG B, WENG L, et al. A new way to replicate the highly stressed soft rock: 3D printing exploration. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2020, 53(1): 467-476.10.1007/s00603-019-01926-1 ↗
22. ASADI-EYDIVAND M, SOLATI-HASHJIN M, SHAFIEI S S, et al. Structure, properties, and in vitro behavior of heat-treated calcium sulfate scaffolds fabricated by 3D printing. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11(3): e151216.10.1371/journal.pone.0151216 ↗
23. SELVARAJ S B, SINGAMNENI S. Pre-moisturized β-hemihydrate for 3d printed molds. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 2015, 31(8): 1102-1112.10.1080/10426914.2015.1037918 ↗
24. SHAHARIAR H, KIM I, BHAKTA R, et al. Direct-write printing process of conductive paste on fiber bulks for wearable textile heaters. Smart Materials and Structures, 2020, 29(8): 085018.10.1088/1361-665X/ab8c25 ↗
25. FIOCCO L, ELSAYED H, BADOCCO D, et al. Direct ink writing of silica-bonded calcite scaffolds from preceramic polymers and fillers. Biofabrication, 2017, 9(2): 025012.10.1088/1758-5090/aa6c37 ↗
26. LIU C B, GAO J M, TANG Y B, et al. Preparation and characterization of gypsum-based materials used for 3D robocasting. Journal of Materials Science, 2018, 53(24): 16415-16422.10.1007/s10853-018-2800-8 ↗
27. ZHANG Y Y, YANG J S, CAO X Y. Effects of several retarders on setting time and strength of building gypsum. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 240: 117927.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117927 ↗
28. HILL J, PLANK J. Retardation of setting of plaster of paris by organic acids: understanding the mechanism through molecular modeling. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 2004, 25(12): 1438-1448.10.1002/jcc.20070 ↗
29. GENSOWSKI K, TEPNER S, SCHWEIGERT S, et al. Conductive highly filled suspensions for an electrochemical dispensing approach to pattern full-area thin metal layers by physical vapour deposition. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1): 27-31.10.1038/s41598-020-64105-1 ↗
30. HOWARD A BARNES. The yield stress—a review or ‘παντα ρει’—everything flows? Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 1999, 81(1): 133-178.10.1016/S0377-0257(98)00094-9 ↗
31. LIU C B, GAO J M, CHEN X M, et al. Effect of polysaccharides on setting and rheological behavior of gypsum-based materials. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 267: 120922.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120922 ↗
32. CAMARINI G, PINTO M C C, MOURA A G D, et al. Effect of citric acid on properties of recycled gypsum plaster to building components. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 124: 383-390.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.112 ↗
33. LIU C B, GAO J M, TANG Y B, et al. Early hydration and microstructure of gypsum plaster revealed by environment scanning electron microscope. Materials Letters, 2019, 234: 49-52.10.1016/j.matlet.2018.09.071 ↗
34. SINGH M, GARG M. Retarding action of various chemicals on setting and hardening characteristics of gypsum plaster at different pH. Cement and Concrete Research, 1997, 27(6): 947-950.10.1016/S0008-8846(97)00045-8 ↗
35. QU J D, LI B Z, PENG J H. Influence of retarders on the microstructure of hardened building gypsum paste and the mechanism of its strength loss. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 250(253): 313-320.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.250-253.313 ↗
36. BÜLICHEN D, PLANK J. Water retention capacity and working mechanism of methyl hydroxypropyl cellulose (MHPC) in gypsum plaster-which impact has sulfate? Cement and Concrete Research, 2013, 46: 66-72.10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.01.014 ↗
37. THOMPSON B R, HOROZOV T S, STOYANOV S D, et al. Hierarchically porous composites fabricated by hydrogel templating and viscous trapping techniques. Materials & Design, 2018, 137: 384-393.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.046 ↗
38. MENG X L, WANG Q Q, WANG Y L. Effect of retarder on properties of FGD gypsum. Shandong Chemical Industry, 2019, 49(4): 17-18.
39. MAGALLANES-RIVERA R X, ESCALANTE-GARCÍA J I, GOROKHOVSKY A. Hydration reactions and microstructural characteristics of hemihydrate with citric and malic acid. Construction and Building Materials, 2009, 23(3): 1298-1305.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.07.022 ↗
40. LANZÓN M, GARCÍA-RUIZ P A. Effect of citric acid on setting inhibition and mechanical properties of gypsum building plasters. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 28(1): 506-511.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.072 ↗