In vitro Study of Biphasic Calcium Magnesium Phosphate Microspheres for Angiogenesis and Bone Formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Bone Metabolism and Diseases · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. NARITA K, KOBAYASHI E, SATO TJMT. Sintering behavior and mechanical properties of magnesium/β-tricalcium phosphate composites sintered by spark plasma sintering. Materials Transactions, 2016, 57(9):1620.10.2320/matertrans.L-M2016827 ↗
2. CHUTHATHIP M, AHMAD-FAUZI M N, YANNY-MARLIANA B I, et al. Effect of magnesium oxide on physical and biological properties in β-tricalcium phosphate ceramic. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2018, 1082(1):012026.10.1088/1742-6596/1082/1/012026 ↗
3. BASU S, BASU B. Doped biphasic calcium phosphate: synthesis and structure. Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies, 2019, 7(3):265.10.1080/21870764.2019.1636928 ↗
4. GHIȚULICĂ C D, CUCURUZ A, VOICU G, et al. Ceramics based on calcium phosphates substituted with magnesium ions for bone regeneration. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, 2020, 17(1):342.10.1111/ijac.13333 ↗
5. MAJI K, DASGUPTA S. Effect of β-tricalcium phosphate nanoparticles additions on the properties of gelatin-chitosan scaffolds. Bioceramics Development & Applications, 2017, 7(2):1000103.
6. MURAKAMI S, MIYAJI H, NISHIDA E, et al. Dose effects of beta-tricalcium phosphate nanoparticles on biocompatibility and bone conductive ability of three-dimensional collagen scaffolds. Dental Materials Journal, 2017, 36(5):573.10.4012/dmj.2016-295 ↗
7. FANG Z Z. Sintering of advanced materials. Cambridge: Elsevier, 2010: 33- 85.10.1533/9781845699949 ↗
8. KAUR I, ELLIS L J, ROMER I, et al. Dispersion of nanomaterials in aqueous media: towards protocol optimization. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2017, 130: e56074.10.3791/56074-v ↗
9. XUE W, DAHLQUIST K, BANERJEE A, et al. Synthesis and characterization of tricalcium phosphate with Zn and Mg based dopants. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2008, 19(7):2669.10.1007/s10856-008-3395-4 ↗
10. GUO X, LONG Y, LI W, et al. Osteogenic effects of magnesium substitution in nano-structured β-tricalcium phosphate produced by microwave synthesis. Journal of Materials Science, 2019, 54(16):11197.10.1007/s10853-019-03674-7 ↗
11. ELIAZ N, METOKI N J M. Calcium phosphate bioceramics: a review of their history, structure, properties, coating technologies and biomedical applications. Materials, 2017, 10(4):334.10.3390/ma10040334 ↗
12. RAO R R, ROOPA H N, KANNAN T S. Solid state synthesis and thermal stability of HAP and HAP-β-TCP composite ceramic powders. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 1997, 8(8):511.
13. RUIZ-AGUILAR C, OLIVARES-PINTO U, AGUILAR-REYES E A, et al. Characterization of β-tricalcium phosphate powders synthesized by Sol-Gel and mechanosynthesis. Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Cerámica y Vidrio, 2018, 57(5):213.10.1016/j.bsecv.2018.04.004 ↗
14. ANDO J. Tricalcium phosphate and its variation. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 1958, 31(2):196.10.1246/bcsj.31.196 ↗
15. OLSSON M. Chemical stability of grain boundariesinβ-tricalcium phosphate ceramics: β-TCP as bone substitute material. Department of Chemistry-Ångström, 2012, 42586904.
16. SGLAVO VM, FRASNELLI M. Effect of Mg2+ doping on beta- alpha phase transition in tricalcium phosphate (TCP) bioceramics. Acta Biomaterialia, 2016, 33: 283.10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.015 ↗
17. MA Y, DAI H, HUANG X, et al. 3D printing of bioglass-reinforced β-TCP porous bioceramic scaffolds. Journal of Materials Science, 2019, 54(14):10437.10.1007/s10853-019-03632-3 ↗
18. GALLO M, SANTONI B L G, DOUILLARD T, et al. Effect of grain orientation and magnesium doping on β-tricalcium phosphate resorption behavior. Acta Biomaterialia, 2019, 89: 391.10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.045 ↗
19. TAVARES D D S, CASTRO L D O, SOARES G D D A, et al. Synthesis and cytotoxicity evaluation of granular magnesium substituted β-tricalcium phosphate. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 2013, 21(1):37.10.1590/1678-7757201302138 ↗
20. LEE D, SFEIR C, KUMTA P N J M S, et al. Novel in-situ synthesis and characterization of nanostructured magnesium substituted β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCMP). Materials Science, 2009, 29(1):69.10.1016/j.msec.2008.05.017 ↗
21. MARCHI J, DANTAS A, GREIL P, et al. Influence of Mg-substitution on the physicochemical properties of calcium phosphate powders. Materials Research Bulletin, 2007, 42(6):1040.10.1016/j.materresbull.2006.09.015 ↗
22. RYU H-S, HONG KS, LEE J-K, et al. Magnesia-doped HA/β-TCP ceramics and evaluation of their biocompatibility. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(3):393.10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00538-6 ↗
23. ZHANG X, JIANG F, GROTH T, et al. Preparation, characterization and mechanical performance of dense β-TCP ceramics with/ without magnesium substitution. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2008, 19(9):3063.10.1007/s10856-008-3442-1 ↗
24. ONUMA K, IIJIMA M J C. Nanoparticles in β-tricalcium phosphate substrate enhance modulation of structure and composition of an octacalcium phosphate grown layer. CrystEngComm, 2017, 19(44):6660.10.1039/C7CE01563A ↗
25. SADER M S, LEGEROS R Z, SOARES G A. Human osteoblasts adhesion and proliferation on magnesium-substituted tricalcium phosphate dense tablets. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2009, 20(2):521.10.1007/s10856-008-3610-3 ↗
26. LIN L C, CHANG S J, KUO S M, et al. Preparation and evaluation of β-TCP/polylactide microspheres as osteogenesis materials. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2008, 108(5):3210.10.1002/app.27309 ↗
27. YUAN Z, WEI P, HUANG Y, et al. Injectable PLGA microspheres with tunable magnesium ion release for promoting bone regeneration. Acta Biomaterialia. 2019, 85: 294.10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.017 ↗
28. WANG J, XU J, HOPKINS C, et al. Biodegradable magnesium ased implants in orthopedics: a general review and perspectives. Advanced Science, 2020, 7(8):201902443.10.1002/advs.201902443 ↗
29. LIN S, YANG G, JIANG F, et al. Bone regeneration: a magnesiumnriched 3D culture system that mimics the bone development microenvironment for vascularized bone regeneration. Advanced Science, 2019, 6(12):1900209.10.1002/advs.201900209 ↗
30. PAN C, SUN X, XU G, et al. The effects of β-TCP on mechanical properties, corrosion behavior and biocompatibility of beta- TCP/Zn-Mg composites. Materials Science & Engineering C, 2020, 108: 110397.10.1016/j.msec.2019.110397 ↗
31. ZHANG H, SHEN Y, XIONG Y, et al. Microstructural, mechanical properties and strengthening mechanism of DLP produced β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds by incorporation of MgO/ZnO/58S bioglass. Ceramics International, 2021, 47(18):25863.10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.05.317 ↗
32. ZHANG J. TANG L, QI H, et al. Dual function of magnesium in bone biomineralization, Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2019, 8(21):1901030.10.1002/adhm.201901030 ↗
33. LIN X, GE J, WEI D, et al. Surface degradation-enabled osseointegrative, angiogenic and antiinfective properties of magnesium- modified acrylic bone cement. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation. 2019, 17: 121.10.1016/j.jot.2019.04.007 ↗
34. HE F, TIAN Y, FANG X, et al. Porous calcium phosphate composite bioceramic beads. Ceramics International, 2018, 44(11):13430.10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.04.109 ↗
35. HO V H, TRIPATHI G, GWON J, et al. Novel TOCNF reinforced injectable alginate/β-tricalcium phosphate microspheres for bone regeneration. Materials & Design, 2020, 194: 108892.10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108892 ↗
36. MURAKAMI M, NGUYEN L T, HATANAKA K, et al. FGF-dependent regulation of VEGF receptor 2 expression in mice. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 2011, 121(7):2668.10.1172/JCI44762 ↗
37. OLIVARES-NAVARRETE R, HYZY S L, GITTENS R A, et al. Rough titanium alloys regulate osteoblast production of angiogenic factors. The Spine Journal, 2013, 13(11):1563.10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.047 ↗
38. MATKAR P N, ARIYAGUNARAJAH R, LEONG-POI H, et al. Friends turned foes: angiogenic growth factors beyond angiogenesis. Biomolecules, 2017, 7(4):74.10.3390/biom7040074 ↗
39. CHIM S M, TICKNER J, CHOW S T, et al. Angiogenic factors in bone local environment. Cytokine Growth Factor Reviews, 2013, 24(3):297.10.1016/j.cytogfr.2013.03.008 ↗
40. TAN A W, LIAU L L, CHUA K H, et al. Enhanced in vitro angiogenic behaviour of human umbilical vein endothelial cells on thermally oxidized TiO2 nanofibrous surfaces. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1):2182810.1038/srep21828 ↗
41. PRZYBYLSKI M. A review of the current research on the role of bFGF and VEGF in angiogenesis. Journal of Wound Care, 2009, 18(12):516.10.12968/jowc.2009.18.12.45609 ↗
42. CHEN Y, OU Y, DONG J, et al. Osteopontin promotes collagen I synthesis in hepatic stellate cells by miRNA-129-5p inhibition. Experimental Cell Research, 2017, 363(1):343.10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.01.010 ↗
43. BHASKAR B, OWEN R, BAHMAEE H, et al. Composite porous scaffold of PEG/PLA support improved bone matrix deposition in vitro compared to PLA-only scaffolds, Journal of Biomedical Research Part A, 2018, 106(5):1334.10.1002/jbm.a.36336 ↗