Preparation and Characterization of Bioactive Glass-Manganese Dioxide Composite Scaffolds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles · Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. SHIEKH P A, SINGH A, KUMAR A. Oxygen releasing antioxidant cryogel scaffolds with sustained oxygen delivery for tissue engineering applications. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, 10(22): 18458-18469.10.1021/acsami.8b01736 ↗
2. LOVETT M, LEE K, EDWARDS A, et al. Vascularization strategies for tissue engineering. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews, 2009, 15(3): 353-370.10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0085 ↗
3. BECQUART P, CAMBON-BINDER A, MONFOULET L E, et al. Ischemia is the prime but not the only cause of human multipotent stromal cell death in tissue-engineered constructs in vivo. Tissue Engineering Part A, 2012, 18(19/20): 2084-2094.10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0690 ↗
4. PISU M, LAI N, CINCOTTI A, et al. Modeling of engineered cartilage growth in rotating bioreactors. Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, 59: 5035-5040.10.1016/j.ces.2004.07.101 ↗
5. TOURI M, MOZTARZADEH F, OSMAN N A A, et al. 3D-printed biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds coated with an oxygen generating system for enhancing engineered tissue survival. Material Science and Engineering C, 2018, 84: 236-242.10.1016/j.msec.2017.11.037 ↗
6. LÜ X G, LI Z, CHEN S Y, et al. Structural and functional evaluation of oxygenating keratin/silk fibroin scaffold and initial assessment of their potential for urethral tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2016, 84: 99-110.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.032 ↗
7. LEE E M, JUNG J I, ALAM Z, et al. Effect of an oxygen- generating scaffold on the viability and insulin secretion function of porcine neonatal pancreatic cell clusters. Xenotransplantation, 2018, 25(2):e12378.10.1111/xen.12378 ↗
8. KUMAR S, ADJEI I M, BROWN S, et al. Manganese dioxide nanoparticles protect cartilage from inflammation-induced oxidative stress. Biomaterials, 2019, 224: 119467.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119467 ↗
9. BIZEAU J, TAPEINOS C, MARELLA C, et al. Synthesis and characterization of hyaluronic acid coated manganese dioxide microparticles that act as ROS scavengers. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2017, 159: 30-38.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.07.081 ↗
10. LI Q, REN J J, CHEN Q B, et al. A HMCuS@MnO2 nanocomplex responsive to multiple tumor environmental clues for photoacoustic/ fluorescence/magnetic resonance trimodal imaging-guided and enhanced photothermal/photodynamic therapy. Nanoscale, 2020, 12(23): 12508-12521.10.1039/D0NR01547D ↗
11. WANG Y D, SONG S Z, LU T, et al. Oxygen-supplementing mesoporous polydopamine nanosponge with WS2 QDs-embedded for CT/MSOT/MR imaging and thermoradiotherapy of hypoxic cancer. Biomaterials, 2019, 220: 119405.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119405 ↗
12. ANAND A, LALZAWMLIANA V, KUMAR V, et al. Preparation and in vivo biocompatibility studies of different mesoporous bioactive glasses. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2019, 89: 89-98.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.09.024 ↗
13. KARGOZAR S, MONTAZERIAN M, HAMZEHLOU S, et al. Mesoporous bioactive glasses: promising platforms for antibacterial strategies. Acta Biomaterialia, 2018, 81: 1-19.10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.052 ↗
14. SAEID K, FRANCESCO B, SEPIDEH H, et al. Bioactive glasses entering the mainstream. Drug Discovery Today, 2018, 23: S1359644618300394.10.1016/j.drudis.2018.05.027 ↗
15. MUBINA M S K, SHAILAJHA S, SANKARANARAYANAN R, et al. In vitro bioactivity, mechanical behavior and antibacterial properties of mesoporous SiO2-CaO-Na2O-P2O5 nano bioactive glass ceramics. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2019, 100: 103379.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103379 ↗
16. FU S Y, ZHU M, ZHU Y F. Organosilicon polymer-derived ceramics: an overview. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2019, 8(4): 457-478.10.1007/s40145-019-0335-3 ↗
17. CHEN Z, SUN X H, SHANG Y P, et al. Dense ceramics with complex shape fabricated by 3D printing: a review. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2021, 10(2): 195-218.10.1007/s40145-020-0444-z ↗
18. YANG L L, ZENG X J, DITTA A, et al. Preliminary 3D printing of large inclined-shaped alumina ceramic parts by direct ink writing. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2020, 9(3): 312-319.10.1007/s40145-020-0369-6 ↗
19. ZHAO Z, ZHOU G X, YANG Z H, et al. Direct ink writing of continuous SiO2 fiber reinforced wave-transparent ceramics. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2020, 9(4): 403-412.10.1007/s40145-020-0380-y ↗
20. WU C T, LUO Y X, CUNIBERTI G, et al. Three-dimensional printing of hierarchical and tough mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds with a controllable pore architecture, excellent mechanical strength and mineralization ability. Acta Biomaterialia, 2011, 7(6): 2644-2650.10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.009 ↗
21. LI L, HU H X, ZHU Y F, et al. 3D-printed ternary SiO2-CaO-P2O5 bioglass-ceramic scaffolds with tunable compositions and properties for bone regeneration. Ceramics International, 2019, 45(8): 10997-11005.10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.02.183 ↗
22. YE X, JIANG X, CHEN L, et al. Effect of manganese dioxide crystal structure on adsorption of SO2 by DFT and experimental study. Applied Surface Science, 2020, 521: 146477.10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146477 ↗
23. REN L L, ZHOU D Y, WANG J J, et al. Biomaterial-based flower-like MnO2@carbon microspheres for rapid adsorption of amoxicillin from wastewater. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2020, 309: 113074.10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113074 ↗
24. CHEN Y, YE D L, WU M Y, et al. Break-up of two-dimensional MnO2nanosheets promotes ultrasensitive pH-triggered theranostics of cancer. Advanced Materials, 2014, 26(41): 7019-7026.10.1002/adma.201402572 ↗
25. HU X N, SHI L Y, ZHANG D S, et al. Accelerating the decomposition of KMnO4 by photolysis and auto-catalysis: a green approach to synthesize a layered birnessite-type MnO2 assembled hierarchical nanostructure. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(17): 14192-14198.10.1039/C5RA22668F ↗
26. SHAABANI A, AFARIDOUN H, SHAABANI S. Natural hydroxyapatite-supported MnO2: a green heterogeneous catalyst for selective aerobic oxidation of alkylarenes and alcohols. Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 2016, 30(9): 772-776.10.1002/aoc.3505 ↗
27. HAO X L, ZHAO J Z, SONG Y H, et al. Surfactant-assisted synthesis of birnessite-type MnO2 nanoflowers. Journal of Nano Research, 2018, 53: 1-6.10.4028/www.scientific.net/JNanoR.53.1 ↗
28. JING X N, XU Y Z, LIU D M, et al. Intelligent nanoflowers: a full tumor microenvironment-responsive multimodal cancer theranostic nanoplatform. Nanoscale, 2019, 11(33): 15508-15518.10.1039/C9NR04768A ↗
29. HE D G, HE X X, WANG K, et al. Redox-responsive degradable honeycomb manganese oxide nanostructures as effective nanocarriers for intracellular glutathione-triggered drug release. Chemical Communications, 2014, 51(4): 776-779.10.1039/C4CC08172B ↗
30. CHEN B, WANG F. NaYbF4@CaF2 core-satellite upconversion nanoparticles: one-pot synthesis and sensitive detection of glutathione. Nanoscale, 2018, 10(42): 19898-19905.10.1039/C8NR05552A ↗
31. WANG Z Z, ZHANG Y, JU E G, et al. Biomimetic nanoflowers by self-assembly of nanozymes to induce intracellular oxidative damage against hypoxic tumors. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1):3334.10.1038/s41467-018-05798-x ↗
32. YAN X X, YU C Z, ZHOU X F, et al. Highly ordered mesoporous bioactive glasses with superior in vitro bone-forming bioactivities. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2004, 116: 6106-6110.10.1002/ange.200460598 ↗
33. DENG R R, XIE X J, VENDRELL M, et al. Intracellular glutathione detection using MnO2-nanosheet-modified upconversion nanoparticles. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2011, 133(50): 20168-20171.10.1021/ja2100774 ↗
34. ZHANG L H, LIAN J S, WU L Y, et al. Synthesis of a thin-layer MnO2 nanosheet-coated Fe3O4 nanocomposite as a magnetically separable photocatalyst. Langmuir, 2014, 30(23): 7006-7013.10.1021/la500726v ↗
35. FRÖHLICH M, GRAYSON W L, WAN L Q, et al. Tissue engineered bone grafts: biological requirements, tissue culture and clinical relevance. Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 2008, 3(4): 254-264.10.2174/157488808786733962 ↗
36. AZIZI F, HEIDARI F, FAHIMIPOUR F, et al. Evaluation of mechanical and biocompatibility properties of hydroxyapatite/manganese dioxide nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering application. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, 2020, 17(5): 2439-2449.10.1111/ijac.13549 ↗
37. HSIEH T E, LIN S J, CHEN L C, et al. Optimizing an injectable composite oxygen-generating system for relieving tissue hypoxia. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2020, 8: 511.10.3389/fbioe.2020.00511 ↗
38. LACY F, KAILASAM M T, O'CONNOR D T, et al. Plasma hydrogen peroxide production in human essential hypertension role of heredity, gender, and ethnicity. Hypertension, 2000, 36(5): 878-884.10.1161/01.HYP.36.5.878 ↗
39. BURGOYNE J R, OKA S I, ALE-AGHA N, et al. Hydrogen peroxide sensing and signaling by protein kinases in the cardiovascular system. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 2013, 18(9): 1042-1052.10.1089/ars.2012.4817 ↗
40. WANG J Q, ZHANG Y Q, ARCHIBONG E, et al. Leveraging H2O2 levels for biomedical applications. Advanced Biosystems, 2017, 1(9):1700084.10.1002/adbi.201700084 ↗
41. TAPEINOS C, LARRAÑAGA A, SARASUA J R, et al. Functionalised collagen spheres reduce H2O2 mediated apoptosis by scavenging overexpressed ROS. Nanomedicine, 2018, 14(7): 2397-2405.10.1016/j.nano.2017.03.022 ↗
42. JÄGER E, HÖCHERL A, JANOUŠKOVÁ O, et al. Fluorescent boronate-based polymer nanoparticles with reactive oxygen species (ROS)-triggered cargo release for drug-delivery applications. Nanoscale, 2016, 8(13): 6958-6963.10.1039/C6NR00791K ↗
43. DEEPAGAN V G, KWON S, YOU D G, et al. In situ diselenide- crosslinked polymeric micelles for ROS-mediated anticancer drug delivery. Biomaterials, 2016, 103: 56-66.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.044 ↗
44. WU C T, RAMASWAMY Y, ZHU Y F, et al. The effect of mesoporous bioactive glass on the physiochemical, biological and drug-release properties of poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) films. Biomaterials, 2009, 30(12): 2199-2208.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.029 ↗
45. WU C T, CHANG J. Degradation, bioactivity, and cytocompatibility of diopside, akermanite, and bredigite ceramics. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials, 2010, 83B(1): 153-160.10.1002/jbm.b.30779 ↗
46. NAWAZ Q, REHMAN M A U, ROETHER J A, et al. Bioactive glass based scaffolds incorporating gelatin/manganese doped mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticle coating. Ceramics International, 2019, 45(12): 14608-14613.10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.179 ↗