journal article·2016-10-30

Experimental study on the compression of concrete filled steel tubular latticed columns with variable cross section

Yan Yang, Jun Zhou, Jiangang Wei, Lei Huang, Qingxiong Wu, Baochun Chen

Steel and Composite Structures· Volume 22· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The effects of slenderness ratio, eccentricity and column slope on the load-carrying capacities and failure modes of variable and uniform concrete filled steel tubular (CFST) latticed columns under axial and eccentric compression were investigated and compared in this study. The results clearly show that all the CFST latticed columns with variable cross section exhibit an overall failure, which is similar to that of CFST latticed columns with a uniform cross section. The load-carrying capacity decreases with the increase of the slenderness ratio or the eccentricity. For 2-m specimens with a slenderness ratio of 9, the ultimate load-carrying capacity is increased by 3% and 5% for variable CFST latticed columns with a slope of 1:40 and 1:20 as compared with that of uniform CFST latticed columns, respectively. For the eccentrically compressed variable CFST latticed columns, the strain of the columns at the loading side, as well as the difference in the strain, increases from the bottom to the cap, and a more significant increase in strain is observed in the cross section closer to the column cap.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Thin-Wall. Struct. · 2012 · 53 · 16110.1016/j.tws.2012.01.011 ↗
2. Int. J. Civil Eng. · 2015 · 13 · 202
3. Appl. Mech. Mater. · 2013 · 405-408 · 94010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.405-408.940 ↗
4. J. Construct. Steel Res. · 2011 · 67 · 169910.1016/j.jcsr.2011.04.005 ↗
5. J. Adv. Mater. Res. · 2011 · 163-167 · 2224
6. Commun. Numer. Method. Eng. · 2004 · 20 · 47910.1002/cnm.684 ↗
7. J. Struct. Multidiscipl. Optimiz. · 2010 · 42 · 89710.1007/s00158-010-0515-9 ↗
8. Appl. Math. Model. · 2013 · 37 · 352610.1016/j.apm.2012.07.053 ↗
9. J. Struct. Eng. · 2011 · 137 · 63510.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000320 ↗
10. ASCE, J. Eng. Mech. · 1995 · 121 · 120010.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1995)121:11(1200) ↗
11. Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J. · 2015 · 8 · 71
12. J. Construct. Steel Res. · 2011 · 67 · 2510.1016/j.jcsr.2010.07.011 ↗
13. MECHANIKA · 2009 · 5 · 5
14. Adv. Mater. Res. · 2012 · 461 · 42510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.461.425 ↗
15. Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J. · 2014 · 16 · 25310.12989/scs.2014.16.3.253 ↗