Influence of Debinding Process on the Properties of Photopolymerization 3D Printed Cordierite Ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
Photopolymerization 3D printing method is an effective means for the manufacturing of ceramics with highly complex-shaped structures and exceptional performance. The printed samples need to undergo heat treatment such as debinding and sintering before becoming usable final ceramic parts in various industrial applications, and the debinding process has a great impact on the properties of the printed ceramic parts. In this study, effect of the debinding process on physical properties and mechanical performance of the cordierite ceramics prepared by DLP photopolymerization 3D printing was studied, and defect suppression strategy was established accordingly. The effects of debinding atmosphere and heating rate on surface cracks and material elemental distribution of ceramic samples were compared and analyzed. The microstructure, size shrinkage, relative density, and mechanical performance such as bending strength of the sintered samples were also studied. It is found that the debinding atmosphere has the
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Photopolymerization techniques and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. CAMERUCCI M A, URRETAVIZCAYA G, CASTRO M S, et al. Electrical properties and thermal expansion of cordierite and cordierite- mullite materials. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2001, 21(16): 2917-2923.10.1016/S0955-2219(01)00219-9 ↗
2. LAMARA S, REDAOUI D, SAHNOUNE F, et al. Microstructure, thermal expansion, hardness and thermodynamic parameters of cordierite materials synthesized from Algerian natural clay minerals and magnesia. Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Cerámica y Vidrio, 2020, 60(5): 291-306.10.1016/j.bsecv.2020.03.008 ↗
3. SITTIAKKARANON S. Thermal shock resistance of mullite- cordierite ceramics from kaolin, talc and alumina raw materials. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2019, 17(4): 1864-1871.10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.224 ↗
4. CHEN Z, LIU C, LI J, et al. Mechanical properties and microstructures of 3D printed bulk cordierite parts. Ceramics International, 2019, 45(15): 19257-19267.10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.174 ↗
5. GÖKÇE H, AĞAOĞULLARI D, ÖVEÇOĞLU M L, et al. Characterization of microstructural and thermal properties of steatite/ cordierite ceramics prepared by using natural raw materials. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2011, 31(14): 2741-2747.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.12.007 ↗
6. AVILA P, MONTES M, MIRÓ E E. Monolithic reactors for environmental applications: a review on preparation technologies. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2005, 109(1/2/3): 11-36.10.1016/j.cej.2005.02.025 ↗
7. DAS R N, MADHUSOODANA C D, OKADA K, Rheological studies on cordierite honeycomb extrusion. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2002, 22(16): 2893-2900.10.1016/S0955-2219(02)00045-6 ↗
8. LIANG Q, LI D, YANG G. Rapid fabrication of diamond-structured ceramic photonic crystals with graded dielectric constant and its controllable stop band properties. Ceramics International, 2013, 39(1): 153-157.10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.06.003 ↗
9. MELCHELS F P W, FEIJEN J, GRIJPMA D W. A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering. Biomaterials, 2010, 31(24): 6121-6130.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050 ↗
10. ZHOU W, LI D, CHEN Z. Direct fabrication of an integral ceramic mould by stereolithography. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2010, 224(2): 237-243.10.1243/09544054JEM1628 ↗
11. ZOCCA A, COLOMBO P, GOMES C M, et al. Additive manufacturing of ceramics: issues, potentialities, and opportunities. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2015, 98(7): 1983-2001.10.1111/jace.13700 ↗
12. CHEN Z, LI Z, LI J, et al. 3D printing of ceramics: a review. Journal of the European Ceramics Society, 2019, 39(4): 661-687.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.11.013 ↗
13. CHEN Z, LI D, ZHOU W. Process parameters appraisal of fabricating ceramic parts based on stereolithography using the Taguchi method. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2012, 226(7): 1249-1258.10.1177/0954405412442607 ↗
14. LIU Y, CHEN Z, LI J, et al. 3D printing of ceramic cellular structures for potential nuclear fusion application. Additive Manufacturing, 2020, 35: 101348.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101348 ↗
15. RASAKI S A, XIONG D, XIONG S, et al. Photopolymerization- based additive manufacturing of ceramics: a systematic review. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2021, 10(3): 442-471.10.1007/s40145-021-0468-z ↗
16. LIU C, XU F, LIU Y, et al. High mass loading ultrathick porous Li4Ti5O12 electrodes with improved areal capacity fabricated via low temperature direct writing. Electrochimica Acta, 2019, 314: 81-88.10.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.082 ↗
17. WU Z, HUAN Z, ZHU Y, et al. 3D printing and characterization of microsphere hydroxyapatite scaffolds. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2021, 36(6): 601-607.10.15541/jim20200499 ↗
18. CHEN Z, BRANDON N. Inkjet printing and nanoindentation of porous alumina multilayers. Ceramics International, 2016, 42(7): 8316-8324.10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.02.045 ↗
19. CHEN Z, OUYANG J, LIANG W, et al. Development and characterizations of novel aqueous-based LSCF suspensions for inkjet printing. Ceramics International, 2018, 44(11): 13381-13388.10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.04.174 ↗
20. ZHANG L, YANG X, XU X, et al. 3D printed zirconia ceramics via fused deposit modeling and its mechanical properties. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2021, 36(4): 436-442.10.15541/jim20200560 ↗
21. LIU S, LI M, WU J, et al. Preparation of high-porosity Al2O3 ceramic foams via selective laser sintering of Al2O3 poly-hollow microspheres. Ceramics International, 2020, 46(4): 4240-4247.10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.144 ↗
22. FERRAGE L, BERTRAND G, LENORMAND P. Dense yttria- stabilized zirconia obtained by direct selective laser sintering. Additive Manufacturing, 2018, 21: 472-478.10.1016/j.addma.2018.02.005 ↗
23. MINASYAN T, LIU L, AGHAYAN M, et al. A novel approach to fabricate Si3N4 by selective laser melting. Ceramics International, 2018, 44(12): 13689-13694.10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.04.208 ↗
24. CHEN Z, LI J, LIU C, et al. Preparation of high solid loading and low viscosity ceramic slurries for photopolymerization-based 3D printing. Ceramics International, 2019, 45(9): 11549-11557.10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.03.024 ↗
25. SHUAI X, ZENG Y, LI P, et al. Fabrication of fine and complex lattice structure Al2O3 ceramic by digital light processing 3D printing technology. Journal of Materials Science, 2020, 55: 6771-6782.10.1007/s10853-020-04503-y ↗
26. LI H, SONG L, SUN J, et al. Stereolithography-fabricated zirconia dental prostheses: concerns based on clinical requirements. Journal of Advances in Applied Ceramics, 2020, 119(5/6): 236-243.10.1080/17436753.2019.1709687 ↗
27. FENG C, ZHANG C, HE R, et al. Additive manufacturing of hydroxyapatite bioceramic scaffolds: dispersion, digital light processing, sintering, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2020, 9: 360-373.10.1007/s40145-020-0375-8 ↗
28. HE R, DING G, ZHANG K, et al. Fabrication of SiC ceramic architectures using stereolithography combined with precursor infiltration and pyrolysis. Ceramics International, 2019, 45(11): 14006-14014.10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.100 ↗
29. ZHANG C, LUO Z, LIU C, et al. Dimensional retention of photocured ceramic units during 3D printing and sintering processes. Ceramics International, 2021, 47(8): 11097-11108.10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.233 ↗
30. CHEN Z, LIU C, LI J, et al. Mechanical properties and microstructures of 3D printed bulk cordierite parts. Ceramics International, 2019, 45(15): 19257-19267.10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.174 ↗