journal article·2015-09-25

Investigating the fatigue failure characteristics of A283 Grade C steel using magnetic flux detection

A. Arifin, W.Z.W. Jusoh, S. Abdullah, N. Jamaluddin, A.K. Ariffin

Steel and Composite Structures· Volume 19· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The Metal Magnetic Memory (MMM) method is a non-destructive testing method based on an analysis of the self-magnetic leakage field distribution on the surface of a component. It is used for determining the stress concentration zones or any irregularities on the surface or inside the components fabricated from ferrous-based materials. Thus, this paper presents the MMM signal behaviour due to the application of fatigue loading. A series of MMM data measurements were performed to obtain the magnetic leakage signal characteristics at the elastic, pre-crack and crack propagation regions that might be caused by residual stresses when cyclic loadings were applied onto the A283 Grade C steel specimens. It was found that the MMM method was able to detect the defects that occurred in the specimens. In addition, a justification of the Self Magnetic Flux Leakage patterns is discussed for demonstrating the effectiveness of this method in assessing the A283 Grade C steel under cyclic loadings.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. NDT & E International · 2010 · 43 · 810.1016/j.ndteint.2009.08.002 ↗
2. Int. J. Fatig. · 2008 · 30 · 159910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.11.009 ↗
3. NDT & E International · 2009 · 42 · 32310.1016/j.ndteint.2008.12.005 ↗
4. Nondestruct. Test. Eva. · 2010 · 25 · 14510.1080/10589750902795366 ↗
5. Appl. Mech. Mater. · 2012 · 190-191 · 41510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.190-191.415 ↗
6. Can. Inst. Non-Destruct. Eva. (CINDE) J. · 2006 · 27 · 16
7. Welding in the World · 2013 · 57 · 12310.1007/s40194-012-0011-5 ↗
8. Meccanica · 2012 · 47 · 13510.1007/s11012-011-9424-2 ↗
9. Adv. Mater. Res. · 2010 · 97-101 · 50010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.97-101.500 ↗
10. NDT & E International · 2001 · 34 · 33710.1016/S0963-8695(00)00073-6 ↗
11. Adv. Mater. Res. · 2010 · 97-101 · 450110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.97-101.4501 ↗
12. NDT & E International · 2010 · 43 · 51310.1016/j.ndteint.2010.05.007 ↗
13. NDT & E International · 2010 · 43 · 35410.1016/j.ndteint.2009.12.006 ↗
14. Appl. Mech. Mater. · 2012 · 268-270 · 39610.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.268-270.396 ↗
15. Journal of Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2012 · 324 · 38210.1016/j.jmmm.2011.08.048 ↗
16. Adv. Mater. Res. · 2010 · 146-147 · 40810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.146-147.408 ↗
17. NDT & E International · 2013 · 55 · 1510.1016/j.ndteint.2013.01.002 ↗
18. Adv. Mater. Res., · 2011 · 298 · 19710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.298.197 ↗
19. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. · 2012 · 35 · 59510.1111/j.1460-2695.2012.01651.x ↗