Akermanite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: 3D Printing Using Polymer Precursor and Scaffold Properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. YAO Y X, QIN W, XING B H, et al. High performance hydroxyapatite ceramics and a triply periodic minimum surface structure fabricated by digital processing 3D printing. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2021, 10(1):39.10.1007/s40145-020-0415-4 ↗
2. PAN M Z, HUA S B, WU J M, et al. Preparation and properties of T-ZnOw enhanced BCP scaffolds with double-layer structure by digital light processing. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2022, 11(4):570.10.1007/s40145-021-0557-z ↗
3. HAUGEN H J, LYNGSTADAAS S P, ROSSI F, et al. Bone grafts: which is the ideal biomaterial. J. Clin. Periodontology, 2019, 46(Suppl 21):92.10.1111/jcpe.13058 ↗
4. WANG C, HUANG W, ZHOU Y, et al. 3D printing of bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Bioactive Materials, 2020, 5(1):82.10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.01.004 ↗
5. KOONS G L, DIBA M, MIKOS A G. Materials design for bone- tissue engineering. Nature Reviews Materials, 2020, 5(8):584.10.1038/s41578-020-0204-2 ↗
6. ZHANG Y, LIU X, ZENG L, et al. Polymer fiber scaffolds for bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Advanced Functional Materials, 2019, 29(36):1903279.10.1002/adfm.201903279 ↗
7. XU C, WU F, YANG J, et al. 3D printed long-term structurally stable bioceramic dome scaffolds with controllable biodegradation favorable for guided bone regeneration. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 450: 138003.10.1016/j.cej.2022.138003 ↗
8. WANG J, PENG Y, CHEN M, et al. Next-generation finely controlled graded porous antibacterial bioceramics for high- efficiency vascularization in orbital reconstruction. Bioactive Materials, 2022, 16: 334.10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.12.028 ↗
9. TURNBULL G, CLARKE J, PICARD F, et al. 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bioactive Materials, 2018, 3(3):278.10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.10.001 ↗
10. MA H S, FENG C, CHANG J, et al. 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds: from bone tissue engineering to tumor therapy. Acta Biomaterialia, 2018, 79: 37.10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.026 ↗
11. ELIAZ N, METOKI N. Calcium phosphate bioceramics: a review of their history, structure, properties, coating technologies and biomedical applications. Materials, 2017, 10(4):334.10.3390/ma10040334 ↗
12. YU X, WU C. Recent development on function improvements of 3D printed bioceramics. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2021, 49(5):829.
13. LI T, ZHAI D, MA B, et al. 3D printing of hot dog-like biomaterials with hierarchical architecture and distinct bioactivity. Advanced Science, 2019, 6(19):1901146.10.1002/advs.201901146 ↗
14. WU C T, CHANG J. A novel akermanite bioceramic: preparation and characteristics. Journal of Biomaterials Applications, 2006, 21(2):119.10.1177/0885328206057953 ↗
15. LIU Q H, CEN L, YIN S, et al. A comparative study of proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells on akermanite and beta-TCP ceramics. Biomaterials, 2008, 29(36):4792.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.08.039 ↗
16. CASTILHO M, RODRIGUES J, PIRES I, et al. Fabrication of individual alginate-TCP scaffolds for bone tissue engineering by means of powder printing. Biofabrication, 2015, 7(1):015004.10.1088/1758-5090/7/1/015004 ↗
17. ZHANG M, LIN R C, WANG X, et al. 3D printing of Haversian bone-mimicking scaffolds for multicellular delivery in bone regeneration. Science Advances, 2020, 6(12):eaaz6725.10.1126/sciadv.aaz6725 ↗
18. FENG C, ZHANG W J, DENG C J, et al. 3D printing of lotus root-like biomimetic materials for cell delivery and tissue regeneration. Advanced Science, 2017, 4(12):1700401.10.1002/advs.201700401 ↗
19. WU C, CHANG J. Degradation, bioactivity, and cytocompatibility of diopside, akermanite, and bredigite ceramics. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B-Applied Biomaterials, 2007, 83B(1):15310.1002/jbm.b.30779 ↗
20. YU W, SUN X, MENG H Y, et al. 3D printed porous ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: a review. Biomaterials Science, 2017, 5(9):1690.10.1039/C7BM00315C ↗
21. HAN Z K, FENG P, GAO C D, et al. Microstructure, mechanical properties and in vitro bioactivity of akermanite scaffolds fabricated by laser sintering. Biomedical Materials and Engineering, 2014, 24(6): 2073.10.3233/BME-141017 ↗
22. WU C T, CHANG J A, ZHAI W Y, et al. Porous akermanite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: preparation, characterization, and in vitro studies. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B-Applied Biomaterials, 2006, 78B(1):47.10.1002/jbm.b.30456 ↗
23. CHEN L, ZHAI D, WU C T, et al. Poly(D, L-lactic)-reinforced akermanite bioceramic scaffolds: preparation and characterization. Ceramics International, 2014, 40(8):12765.10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.04.130 ↗
24. NAJAFINEZHAD A, ABDELLAHI M, NASIRI-HARCHEGANI S, et al. On the synthesis of nanostructured akermanite scaffolds via space holder method: the effect of the spacer size on the porosity and mechanical properties. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2017, 69: 242.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.002 ↗
25. FU S Y, ZHU M, ZHU Y F. Organosilicon polymer-derived ceramics: an overview. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2019, 8(4):457.10.1007/s40145-019-0335-3 ↗
26. ZOCCA A, ELSAYED H, BERNARDO E, et al. 3D-printed silicate porous bioceramics using a non-sacrificial preceramic polymer binder. Biofabrication, 2015, 7(2):025008.10.1088/1758-5090/7/2/025008 ↗
27. FIOCCO L, LI S, STEVENS M M, et al. Biocompatibility and bioactivity of porous polymer-derived Ca-Mg silicate ceramics. Acta Biomaterialia, 2017, 50: 56.10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.043 ↗
28. FIOCCO L, ELSAYED H, FERRONI L, et al. Bioactive wollastonite-diopside foams from preceramic polymers and reactive oxide fillers. Materials, 2015, 8(5):2480.10.3390/ma8052480 ↗
29. ELSAYED H, ZOCCA A, BERNARDO E, et al. Development of bioactive silicate-based glass-ceramics from preceramic polymer and fillers. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2015, 35(2):731.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.09.020 ↗
30. FU S Y, HU H R, CHEN J J, et al. Silicone resin derived larnite/C scaffolds via 3D printing for potential tumor therapy and bone regeneration. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 382: 122928.10.1016/j.cej.2019.122928 ↗
31. LIU W Y, ZUO R T, ZHU T L, et al. Forsterite-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds with photothermal antibacterial activity for bone repair. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2021, 10(5):1095.10.1007/s40145-021-0494-x ↗
32. BERNARDO E, FIOCCO L, GIFFIN G A, et al. Microstructure development and dielectric characterization of forsterite-based ceramics from silicone resins and oxide fillers. Advanced Engineering Materials, 2014, 16(6):806.10.1002/adem.201400125 ↗
33. ELSAYED H, CARRARO F, AGNOLI S, et al. Direct ink writing of silica-carbon-calcite composite scaffolds from a silicone resin and fillers. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2018, 38(15):5200.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.07.049 ↗
34. ANDRIANOV N T, ABDEL'-GAVAD S R, ZENKOVA N V. Synthesis and sintering of cordierite sol-gel powders based on different magnesium salts. Glass and Ceramics, 2006, 63(11/12):415.10.1007/s10717-006-0137-2 ↗
35. LIU W, WANG T, YANG C, et al. Alkaline biodegradable implants for osteoporotic bone defects-importance of microenvironment pH. Osteoporosis International, 2016, 27(1):93.10.1007/s00198-015-3217-8 ↗
36. WANG C, XUE Y, LIN K, et al. The enhancement of bone regeneration by a combination of osteoconductivity and osteostimulation using β-CaSiO3/β-Ca3(PO4)2 composite bioceramics. Acta Biomaterialia, 2012, 8(1):350.10.1016/j.actbio.2011.08.019 ↗
37. LI M, BAI J, TAO H, et al. Rational integration of defense and repair synergy on PEEK osteoimplants via biomimetic peptide clicking strategy. Bioactive Mateirials, 2022, 8: 309.10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.07.002 ↗
38. CHEN M W, HU Y, HOU Y H, et al. Magnesium/gallium-layered nanosheets on titanium implants mediate osteogenic differentiation of MSCs and osseointegration under osteoporotic condition. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 427: 130982.10.1016/j.cej.2021.130982 ↗
39. LANGER R, VACANTI J P. Tissue engineering. Science, 1993, 260(5110):920.10.1126/science.8493529 ↗
40. JO S, HAN J, LEE Y L, et al. Regulation of osteoblasts by alkaline phosphatase in ankylosing spondylitis. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases, 2019, 22(2):252.10.1111/1756-185X.13419 ↗
41. PEREIRA D D, DAVISON N, HABIBOVIC P. Human osteoclast formation and resorptive function on biomineralized collagen. Bioactive Materials, 2022, 8: 241.10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.036 ↗
42. JUNG G Y, PARK Y J, HAN J S. Effects of HA released calcium ion on osteoblast differentiation. Journal of Materials Science- Materials in Medicine, 2010, 21(5):1649.10.1007/s10856-010-4011-y ↗
43. ZHANG X Z, ZU H Y, ZHAO D W, et al. Ion channel functional protein kinase TRPM7 regulates Mg ions to promote the osteoinduction of human osteoblast via PI3K pathway: In vitro simulation of the bone-repairing effect of Mg-based alloy implant. Acta Biomaterialia, 2017, 63: 369.10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.051 ↗
44. QIAO W, WONG K H M, SHEN J, et al. TRPM7 kinase-mediated immunomodulation in macrophage plays a central role in magnesium ion-induced bone regeneration. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1):2885.10.1038/s41467-021-23005-2 ↗
45. YAN L X, LI H Y, XIA W L. Bioglass could increase cell membrane fluidity with ion products to develop its bioactivity. Cell Proliferation, 2020, 53(11):e12906.10.1111/cpr.12906 ↗