Research Progress on Functional Modifications and Applications of Bioceramic Scaffolds
Source abstract
Abstract
Porous bioceramic scaffolds, which possess attractive biocompatibility, ability to guide tissue regeneration and porous surface morphologies and channels beneficial to ingrowth of new born tissues, have seized increasing attentions and been widely applied in the field of hard tissue restoration. Whereas, the weak osteoinductive activity, monotonous biological function and poor mechanical property have restrained the therapeutic efficacy and wider application of bioceramic scaffolds. In view of this, we intended to introduce the existing modification methods of bioceramic scaffolds, including the surface modification with functional coating, construction of surface micro-/nano- structures, functional element doping and enhancement of mechanical property, along with the state of the research progresses in the improvement of biocompatibility, bone defect restoration, drug delivery, tumor therapy, and antibacterial capacity of multifunctional bioceramic scaffolds. In addition, potential research directions and applications of functionally modified bioceramic scaffolds are prospected to provide references for the related exploration afterwards.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
null;2. Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China;
2. Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China;
2. Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China;null;
null;
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. GEORGAKILAS V, TIWARI J N, KEMP K C, et al. Noncovalent functionalization of graphene and graphene oxide for energy materials, biosensing, catalytic, and ciomedical applications. Chemical Reviews, 2016,116(9):5464-5519.10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00620 ↗
2. HABRAKEN W, HABIBOVIC P, EPPLE M, et al. Calcium phosphates in biomedical applications: materials for the future? Materials Today, 2016,19(2):69-87.10.1016/j.mattod.2015.10.008 ↗
3. LIN K L, WU C T, CHANG J. Advances in synthesis of calcium phosphate crystals with controlled size and shape. Acta Biomaterialia, 2014,10(10):4071-4102.10.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.017 ↗
4. WANG X L, REN Z M, CHANG J. Synthesis and orientation of Fe-doped hydroxyapatite in high magnetic field. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2018,33(1):75-80.10.15541/jim20170137 ↗
5. ZHANG B, YANG C A, SHI P. Synthesis of graphene/ hydroxyapatite composite bioceramics via plasma Activated sintering, Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2018,33(12):1355-1359.10.15541/jim20180142 ↗
6. WU C T, CHANG J. Silicate bioceramics for bone tissue regeneration. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2013,28(1):29-39.10.3724/SP.J.1077.2013.12241 ↗
7. DONG S, CHEN Y, YU L, et al. Magnetic hyperthermia- synergistic H2O2 self-sufficient catalytic suppression of osteosarcoma with enhanced bone-regeneration bioactivity by 3D-printing composite scaffolds. Advanced Functional Materials, 2019, 30(4): 1907071-1-15.10.1002/adfm.201907071 ↗
8. SHI Z Y, LI Q, TANG S C, et al. Surface modification on property of mesoporous calcium magnesium silicate/polyetheretherketone composites. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2018,33(1):67-74.10.15541/jim20170120 ↗
9. BAI F, WANG Z, LU J, et al. The correlation between the internal structure and vascularization of controllable porous bioceramic aterials in vivo: a quantitative study. Tissue Engineering Part A, 2010,16(12):3791-3803.10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0148 ↗
10. LIN K L, CHANG J, ZENG Y, et al. Preparation of macroporous calcium silicate ceramics. Materials Letters, 2004,58(15):2109-2113.10.1016/j.matlet.2004.01.008 ↗
11. BAINO F, FIUME E, BARBERI J, et al. Processing methods for making porous bioactive glass-based scaffolds-a state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, 2019,16(5):1762-1796.10.1111/ijac.13195 ↗
12. XIN C, QI X, ZHU M, et al. Hydroxyapatite whisker-reinforced composite scaffolds through 3D printing for bone repair. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2017,32(8):837-844.10.15541/jim20160628 ↗
13. MA H, FENG C, CHANG J, et al. 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds: from bone tissue engineering to tumor therapy. Acta Biomaterialia, 2018,79:37-59.10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.026 ↗
14. VON ERLACH T C, BERTAZZO S, WOZNIAK M A, et al. Cell-geometry-dependent changes in plasma membrane order direct stem cell signalling and fate. Nature Materials, 2018,17(3):237-242.10.1038/s41563-017-0014-0 ↗
15. ROGOWSKA-TYLMAN J, LOCS J, SALMA I, et al. In vivo and in vitro study of a novel nanohydroxyapatite sonocoated scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration. Materials Science & Engineering: C, 2019,99:669-684.10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.084 ↗
16. YANG B W, YIN J H, CHEN Y, et al. 2D-black-phosphorus- reinforced 3D-printed scaffolds: a stepwise countermeasure for osteosarcoma. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(10): 1705611-1-12.10.1002/adma.201705611 ↗
17. ZHANG Y L, ZHAI D, XU M C, et al. 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds with antibacterial and osteogenic activity. Biofabrication, 2017, 9(2): 025037-1-12.10.1088/1758-5090/aa6ed6 ↗
18. ZHANG X, LI H, LIU J, et al. Amorphous carbon modification on implant surface: a general strategy to enhance osteogenic differentiation for diverse biomaterials via FAK/ERK1/2 signaling pathways. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2019,7(15):2518-2533.10.1039/C8TB02850H ↗
19. TOURI M, MOZTARZADEH F, OSMAN N A A, et al. 3D- printed biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds coated with an oxygen generating system for enhancing engineered tissue survival. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2018,84:236-242.10.1016/j.msec.2017.11.037 ↗
20. WANG C, LIN K, CHANG J, et al. Osteogenesis and angiogenesis induced by porous beta-CaSiO3/PDLGA composite scaffold via activation of AMPK/ERK1/2 and PI3K/Akt pathways. Biomaterials, 2013,34(1):64-77.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.021 ↗
21. LIN K, XIA L, GAN J, et al. Tailoring the nanostructured surfaces of hydroxyapatite bioceramics to promote protein adsorption, osteoblast growth, and osteogenic differentiation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2013,5(16):8008-8017.10.1021/am402089w ↗
22. ZHAO C, XIA L, ZHAI D, et al. Designing ordered micropatterned hydroxyapatite bioceramics to promote the growth and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2015,3(6):968-976.10.1039/C4TB01838A ↗
23. MAO L, LIU J, ZHAO J, et al. Effect of micro-nano-hybrid structured hydroxyapatite bioceramics on osteogenic and cementogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cell via Wnt signaling pathway. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2015,10:7031-7044.10.2147/IJN.S90343 ↗
24. XIA L, LIN K, JIANG X, et al. Effect of nano-structured bioceramic surface on osteogenic differentiation of adipose derived stem cells. Biomaterials, 2014,35(30):8514-8527.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.028 ↗
25. WANG X, ZHOU Y, XIA L, et al. Fabrication of nano-structured calcium silicate coatings with enhanced stability, bioactivity and osteogenic and angiogenic activity. Colloids and Surfaces B-Biointerfaces, 2015,126:358-366.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.11.044 ↗
26. XIA L, XIE Y, FANG B, et al. In situ modulation of crystallinity and nano-structures to enhance the stability and osseointegration of hydroxyapatite coatings on Ti-6Al-4V implants. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018,347:711-720.10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.045 ↗
27. XIA L, ZHANG N, WANG X, et al. The synergetic effect of nano-structures and silicon-substitution on the properties of hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone regeneration. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2016,4(19):3313-3323.10.1039/C6TB00187D ↗
28. DENG C J, LIN R C, ZHANG M, et al. Micro/nanometer- structured scaffolds for regeneration of both cartilage and subchondral bone. Advanced Functional Materials, 2019,29(4):1806068-15.10.1002/adfm.201806068 ↗
29. YANG C, WANG X Y, MA B, et al. 3D-printed bioactive Ca3SiO5 bone cement scaffolds with nano surface structure for bone regeneration. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017,9(7):5757-5767.10.1021/acsami.6b14297 ↗
30. WANG X C, LI T, MA H S, et al. A 3D-printed scaffold with MoS2 nanosheets for tumor therapy and tissue regeneration. NPG Asia Materials, 2017, 9: e376-1-14.10.1038/am.2017.47 ↗
31. XIA L, LIN K, JIANG X, et al. Enhanced osteogenesis through nano-structured surface design of macroporous hydroxyapatite bioceramic scaffolds via activation of ERK and p38 MAPK signaling pathways. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2013,1(40):5403-5416.10.1039/c3tb20945h ↗
32. DONG S, ZHANG Y-N, WANG J, et al. A novel multifunctional carbon aerogel coated platform for osteosarcoma therapy and enhanced bone regeneration. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2020,8(3):368-379.10.1039/C9TB02383F ↗
33. WANG C, LIN K, CHANG J, et al. The stimulation of osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and vascular endothelial growth factor secretion of endothelial cells by beta-CaSiO3/beta- Ca3(PO4)(2) scaffolds. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2014,102(7):2096-2104.10.1002/jbm.a.34880 ↗
34. WITTE F, KAESE V, HAFERKAMP H, et al. In vivo corrosion of four magnesium alloys and the associated bone response. Biomaterials, 2005,26(17):3557-3563.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.049 ↗
35. YOSHIZAWA S, BROWN A, BARCHOWSKY A, et al. Magnesium ion stimulation of bone marrow stromal cells enhances osteogenic activity, simulating the effect of magnesium alloy degradation. Acta Biomaterialia, 2014,10(6):2834-2842.10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.002 ↗
36. XIA L, YIN Z, MAO L, et al. Akermanite bioceramics promote osteogenesis,angiogenesis and suppress osteoclastogenesis for osteoporotic bone regeneration. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 22005- 1-17.10.1038/srep22005 ↗
37. AMIN N, CLARK C C T, TAGHIZADEH M, et al. Zinc supplements and bone health: the role of the RANKL-RANK axis as a therapeutic target. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, 2019, DOI: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2019.126417.10.1016/j.jtemb.2019.126417 ↗
38. QIAO Y Q, ZHANG W J, TIAN P, et al. Stimulation of bone growth following zinc incorporation into biomaterials. Biomaterials, 2014,35(25):6882-6897.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.101 ↗
39. LIN K L, XIA L G, LI H Y, et al. Enhanced osteoporotic bone regeneration by strontium-substituted calcium silicate bioactive ceramics. Biomaterials, 2013,34(38):10028-10042.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.056 ↗
40. LIU W, WANG T, YANG C, et al. Alkaline biodegradable implants for osteoporotic bone defects-importance of microenvironment pH. Osteoporosis International, 2016,27(1):93-104.10.1007/s00198-015-3217-8 ↗
41. GUO X, WEI S, LU M, et al. Dose-dependent effects of strontium ranelate on ovariectomy rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and human umbilical vein endothelial cells. International Journal of Biological Sciences, 2016,12(12):1511-1522.10.7150/ijbs.16499 ↗
42. GUO X, WEI S, LU M, et al. RNA-Seq investigation and in vivo study the effect of strontium ranelate on ovariectomized rat via the involvement of ROCK1. Artificial Cells Nanomedicine and Biotechnology, 2018,46:S629-S641.10.1080/21691401.2018.1433188 ↗
43. LIN K, WANG X, ZHANG N, et al. Strontium (Sr) strengthens the silicon (Si) upon osteoblast proliferation, osteogenic differentiation and angiogenic factor expression. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2016,4(21):3632-3638.10.1039/C6TB00735J ↗
44. WANG C Y, CHEN B, WANG W, et al. Strontium released bi-lineage scaffolds with immunomodulatory properties induce a pro-regenerative environment for osteochondral regeneration. Materials Science & Engineering: C, 2019, 103: 109833-1-12.10.1016/j.msec.2019.109833 ↗
45. ZHANG X, LI H, LIN C, et al. Synergetic topography and chemistry cues guiding osteogenic differentiation in bone marrow stromal cells through ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Biomaterials Science, 2018,6(2):418-430.10.1039/C7BM01044C ↗
46. FIELDING G, BOSE S. SiO2 and ZnO dopants in three- dimensionally printed tricalcium phosphate bone tissue engineering scaffolds enhance osteogenesis and angiogenesis in vivo. Acta Biomaterialia, 2013,9(11):9137-9148.10.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.009 ↗
47. WU C, ZHAI D, MA H, et al. Stimulation of osteogenic and angiogenic ability of cells on polymers by pulsed laser deposition of uniform akermanite-glass nanolayer. Acta Biomaterialia, 2014,10(7):3295-3306.10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.035 ↗
48. KONG N, LIN K, LI H, et al. Synergy effects of copper and silicon ions on stimulation of vascularization by copper-doped calcium silicate. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2014,2(8):1100-1110.10.1039/C3TB21529F ↗
49. SHI M C, CHEN Z T, FARNAGHI S, et al. Copper-doped mesoporous silica nanospheres, a promising immunomodulatory agent for inducing osteogenesis. Acta Biomaterialia, 2016,30:334-344.10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.033 ↗
50. LI J Y, ZHAI D, LV F, et al. Preparation of copper-containing bioactive glass/eggshell membrane nanocomposites for improving angiogenesis, antibacterial activity and wound healing. Acta Biomaterialia, 2016,36:254-266.10.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.011 ↗
51. LI H, LI J Y, JIANG J, et al. An osteogenesis/angiogenesis- stimulation artificial ligament for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Acta Biomaterialia, 2017,54:399-410.10.1016/j.actbio.2017.03.014 ↗
52. ZHOU Y H, HAN S W, XIAO L, et al. Accelerated host angiogenesis and immune responses by ion release from mesoporous bioactive glass. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2018,6(20):3274-3284.10.1039/C8TB00683K ↗
53. LIN R C, DENG C J, LI X X, et al. Copper-incorporated bioactive glass-ceramics inducing anti-inflammatory phenotype and regeneration of cartilage/bone interface. Theranostics, 2019,9(21):6300-6313.10.7150/thno.36120 ↗
54. DANG W T, WANG X Y, LI J Y, et al. 3D printing of Mo- containing scaffolds with activated anabolic responses and bi-lineage bioactivities. Theranostics, 2018,8(16):4372-4392.10.7150/thno.27088 ↗
55. LIU Y Q, LI T, MA H S, et al. 3D-printed scaffolds with bioactive elements-induced photothermal effect for bone tumor therapy. Acta Biomaterialia, 2018,73:531-546.10.1016/j.actbio.2018.04.014 ↗
56. MEININGER S, MANDAL S, KUMAR A, et al. Strength reliability and in vitro degradation of three-dimensional powder printed strontium-substituted magnesium phosphate scaffolds. Acta Biomaterialia, 2016,31:401-411.10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.050 ↗
57. MEININGER S, MOSEKE C, SPATZ K, et al. Effect of strontium substitution on the material properties and osteogenic potential of 3D powder printed magnesium phosphate scaffolds. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2019,98:1145-1158.10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.053 ↗
58. XIE J, SHAO H, HE D, et al. Ultrahigh strength of three- dimensional printed diluted magnesium doping wollastonite porous scaffolds. MRS Communications, 2015,5(4):631-639.10.1557/mrc.2015.74 ↗
59. KE X, ZHANG L, YANG X, et al. Low-melt bioactive glass- reinforced 3D printing akermanite porous cages with highly improved mechanical properties for lumbar spinal fusion. J Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 2018,12(5):1149-1162.
60. FU S Y, YU B, DING H F, et al, Zirconia incorporation in 3D printed beta-Ca2SiO4 scaffolds on their physicochemical and biological property. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2019,34(4):444-454.10.15541/jim20180466 ↗
61. ZHANG F, CHANG J, LU J, et al. Bioinspired structure of bioceramics for bone regeneration in load-bearing sites. Acta Biomaterialia, 2007,3(6):896-904.10.1016/j.actbio.2007.05.008 ↗
62. FENG C, ZHANG W, DENG C, et al. 3D Printing of lotus root-like biomimetic materials for cell delivery and tissue regeneration. Advanced Science, 2017, 4(12): 1700401-1-9.10.1002/advs.201700401 ↗
63. ALMELA T, BROOK I M, KHOSHROO K, et al. Simulation of cortico-cancellous bone structure by 3D printing of bilayer calcium phosphate-based scaffolds. Bioprinting, 2017,6:1-7.10.1016/j.bprint.2017.04.001 ↗
64. JUNG-BIN L, WOO-YOUL M, YOUNG-HAG K, et al. Porous calcium phosphate ceramic scaffolds with tailored pore orientations and mechanical properties using lithography-based ceramic 3D printing technique. Materials, 11(9):1711-1718.10.3390/ma11091711 ↗
65. MATHARU G S, DANIEL J, ZIAEE H, et al. Failure of a novel ceramic-on-ceramic hip resurfacing prosthesis. Journal of Arthroplasty, 2015,30(3):416-418.10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.019 ↗
66. MANNY P, JAVAD P, SHARKEY P F, et al. Causes of failure of ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 2012,470(2):382-387.10.1007/s11999-011-2161-y ↗
67. ZHAO L, WU C T, LIN K L, et al. The effect of poly(lactic-co- glycolic acid)(PLGA) coating on the mechanical, biodegradable, bioactive properties and drug release of porous calcium silicate scaffolds. Bio-medical Materials and Engineering, 2012,22(5):289-300.10.3233/BME-2012-0719 ↗
68. LI CHEN, AI FANRONG, MIAO XINXIN, et al. “The return of ceramic implants”: rose stem inspired dual layered modification of ceramic scaffolds with improved mechanical and anti-infective properties. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2018,93:873-879.
69. KIM B S, YANG S S, PARK H, et al. Improvement of mechanical strength and osteogenic potential of calcium sulfate-based hydroxyapatite 3-dimensional printed scaffolds by epsilon- polycarbonate coating. Journal of Biomaterials Science-Polymer Edition, 2017,28(13):1256-1270.10.1080/09205063.2017.1312059 ↗
70. DíAZ-RODRíGUEZ P, GONZáLEZ P, SERRA J, et al. Key parameters in blood-surface interactions of 3D bioinspired ceramic materials. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2014,41:232-239.10.1016/j.msec.2014.04.058 ↗
71. LIENEMANN P S, LUTOLF M P, MARTIN E. Biomimetic hydrogels for controlled biomolecule delivery to augment bone regeneration. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2012,64(12):1078-1089.10.1016/j.addr.2012.03.010 ↗
72. LI M, CHENG Y, ZHENG Y F, et al. Surface characteristics and corrosion behaviour of WE43 magnesium alloy coated by SiC film. Applied Surface Science. 2012,258(7):3074-3081.10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.11.040 ↗
73. YANG Y, LAI Y, ZHANG Q, et al. A novel electrochemical strategy for improving blood compatibility of titanium-based biomaterials. Colloids & Surfaces B Biointerfaces, 2010,79(1):309-313.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.04.013 ↗
74. ZHAO L, LIN K L, ZHANG M L, et al. The influences of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) coating on the biodegradability, bioactivity, and biocompatibility of calcium silicate bioceramics. Journal of Materials Science, 2011,46(14):4986-4993.10.1007/s10853-011-5416-9 ↗
75. WEI T, DANG-SHENG X. Bioinspired superhydrophobic progress and recent advances of its functional application. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2019,34(11):1133-1144.10.15541/jim20180591 ↗
76. ARIMA Y, IWATA H, Effect of wettability and surface functional groups on protein adsorption and cell adhesion using well-defined mixed self-assembled monolayers. Biomaterials, 2007,28(20):3074-3082.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.013 ↗
77. TENG Y Q, ZHANG Y Q, HENG L P, et al. Conductive polymer porous film with tunable wettability and adhesion. Materials, 2015,8(4):1817-1830.10.3390/ma8041817 ↗
78. CHEN Z, ZHANG D, PENG E, et al. 3D-printed ceramic structures with in situ grown whiskers for effective oil/water separation. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019,373:1223-1232.10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.150 ↗
79. SONG Y, LIN K, HE S, et al. Nano-biphasic calcium phosphate/polyvinyl alcohol composites with enhanced bioactivity for bone repair via low-temperature three-dimensional printing and loading with platelet-rich fibrin. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2018,13:505-523.10.2147/IJN.S152105 ↗
80. TROMBETTA R, INZANA J A, SCHWARZ E M, et al. 3D printing of calcium phosphate ceramics for bone tissue engineering and drug delivery. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2017,45(1):1-22.10.1007/s10439-016-1678-3 ↗
81. BOSE S, VAHABZADEH S, BANDYOPADHYAY A. Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Materials Today, 2013,16(12):496-504.10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017 ↗
82. ZHANG Y L, ZHAI D, XU M C, et al. 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds with a Fe3O4/graphene oxide nanocomposite interface for hyperthermia therapy of bone tumor cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2016,4(17):2874-2886.10.1039/C6TB00390G ↗
83. TORRES P M C, VIEIRA S I, CERQUEIRA A R, et al. Effects of Mn-doping on the structure and biological properties of β-tricalcium phosphate. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 2014,136:57-66.10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2014.03.013 ↗
84. MIN Z, SHICHANG Z, CHEN X, et al. 3D-printed dimethyloxallyl glycine delivery scaffolds to improve angiogenesis and osteogenesis. Biomater. Sci., 2015,3(8):1236-1244.
85. DIAZ-RODRIGUEZ P, SANCHEZ M, LANDIN M. Drug-loaded biomimetic ceramics for tissue engineering. Pharmaceutics, 2018, 10(4): 272-1-20.10.3390/pharmaceutics10040272 ↗
86. MEIßNER R, BERTOL L, REHMAN M A U, et al. Bioprinted 3D calcium phosphate scaffolds with gentamicin releasing capability. Ceramics International, 2019,45(6):7090-7094.10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.12.212 ↗
87. LI T, ZHAI D, MA B, et al. 3D printing of hot dog-like biomaterials with hierarchical architecture and distinct bioactivity. Advanced Science, 2019,6(19):1901146-8.10.1002/advs.201901146 ↗
88. SONG J-J, CHEN B, LIN K-L. Core-shell structured hydroxyapatite/mesoporous silica nanoparticle: preparation and application in drug delivery. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2018,33(6):623-628.10.15541/jim20170361 ↗
89. CHEN G, ROY I, YANG C, et al. Nanochemistry and nanomedicine for nanoparticle-based diagnostics and therapy. Chemical Reviews, 2016,116(5):2826-2885.10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00148 ↗
90. ZHEN F, YAN C, CUI C, et al. Near infrared fluorescent peptide nanoparticles for enhancing esophageal cancer therapeutic efficacy. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 2605-1-11.10.1038/s41467-018-04763-y ↗
91. WANG S, CHEN Y, LI X, et al. Injectable 2D MoS2-integrated drug delivering implant for highly efficient NIR-triggered synergistic tumor hyperthermia. Advanced Materials, 2015,27(44):7117-7122.10.1002/adma.201503869 ↗
92. CHANDRAWATI D R, CHANG D J Y H, REINATORRES D E, et al. Localized and controlled delivery of nitric oxide to the conventional outflow pathway via enzyme biocatalysis: toward therapy for glaucoma. Advanced Materials, 2017, 29(16): 1604932-1-7.10.1002/adma.201604932 ↗
93. BADGWELL B, BLUM M, ESTRELLA J, et al. Personalised therapy for localised gastric and gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Lancet Oncology, 2016,17(12):1628-1629.10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30521-6 ↗
94. YANG B W, GU Z, CHEN Y. Nanomedicine-augmented cancer-localized treatment by 3D theranostic implants. Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology, 2017,13(8):871-890.10.1166/jbn.2017.2401 ↗
95. MA H, JIANG C, ZHAI D, et al. A bifunctional biomaterial with photothermal effect for tumor therapy and bone regeneration. Advanced Functional Materials, 2016,26(8):1197-1208.10.1002/adfm.201504142 ↗
96. WU P, GRAINGER D W. Drug/device combinations for local drug therapies and infection prophylaxis. Biomaterials, 2006,27(11):2450-2467.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.031 ↗
97. ARIJIT KUMAR C, RUCHIRA C, TARAKDAS B. Mechanism of antibacterial activity of copper nanoparticles. Nanotechnology, 2014, 25(13): 135101-1-13.10.1088/0957-4484/25/13/135101 ↗
98. SCHRAND A M, RAHMAN M F, HUSSAIN S M, et al. Metal-based nanoparticles and their toxicity assessment. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, 2010,2(5):544-568.10.1002/wnan.103 ↗
99. LIAO F, MA J Q, GE H G. Preparation, characterization and antimicrobial activity of core-satellite Ag/PDA@SiO2@CoFe2O4 magnetic composites. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2017,32(5):523-528.10.15541/jim20160427 ↗
100. LIU Y L, WANG R L, LI N, et al. Preparation of zinc oxide mesocrystal filler and the properties of dental composite resins. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2019,34(10):1077-1084.