Using friction dampers in retrofitting a steel structure with masonry infill panels
Source abstract
Abstract
A convenient procedure for seismic retrofit of existing buildings is to use passive control methods, like using friction dampers in steel frames with bracing systems. In this method, reduction of seismic demand and increase of ductility generally improve seismic performance of the structures. Some of its advantages are development of a stable rectangular hysteresis loop and independence on environmental conditions such as temperature and loading rate. In addition to friction dampers, masonry-infill panels improve the seismic resistance of steel structures by increasing lateral strength and stiffness and reducing story drifts. In this study, the effect of masonry-infill panels on seismic performance of a three-span four-story steel frame with Pall friction dampers is investigated. The results show that friction dampers in the steel frame increase the ductility and decrease the drift (to less than 1%). The infill panels fulfill their function during the imposed drift and increase structural strength. It can be concluded that infill panels together with friction dampers, reduced structural dynamic response. These infill panels dissipated input earthquake energy from 4% to 10%, depending on their thickness.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Open Construct. Build. Technol. J. · 2012 · 6 · 16410.2174/1874836801206010164 ↗
2. J. Struct. Eng. · 2011 · 137 · 150810.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000384 ↗
3. Eng. Struct. · 2013 · 52 · 34010.1016/j.engstruct.2013.02.036 ↗
4. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering · 2000 · 33 · 3010.5459/bnzsee.33.1.30-47 ↗
5. Eng. Struct. · 2008 · 30 · 199110.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.001 ↗
6. Eng. Struct. · 2012 · 44 · 13310.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.023 ↗
7. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. · 2012 · 39 · 1110.1016/j.soildyn.2012.02.004 ↗
8. ASCE J. Struct. Eng. · 1997 · 67 · 2A
9. Comput. Struct. · 2011 · 89 · 102610.1016/j.compstruc.2011.01.006 ↗
10. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. · 2015 · 11 · 16210.1080/15732479.2013.862726 ↗
11. Eng. Struct. · 2010 · 32 · 311210.1016/j.engstruct.2010.05.030 ↗
12. Eng. Struct. · 2012 · 34 · 51410.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.043 ↗
13. Eng. Struct. · 2012 · 42 · 8310.1016/j.engstruct.2012.04.005 ↗
14. Eng. Struct. · 2005 · 27 · 125810.1016/j.engstruct.2005.03.010 ↗
15. Asian J. Civil Eng. · 2007 · 8 · 329