Experimental study on seismic performance of partial penetration welded steel beam-column connections with different fillet radii
Source abstract
Abstract
Full penetration welded steel moment-resisting frame (SMRF) structures with welded box sections are widely employed in steel bridges, where a large number of steel bridges have been in operation for over fifty years in Japan. Welding defects such as incomplete penetration at the beam-column connections of these existing SMRF steel bridge piers were observed during inspection. Previous experiments conducted by the authors' team indicate that gusset stiffeners (termed fillets in this study) at the beam-web-to-column-web joint of the beam-column connections may play an important role on the seismic performance of the connections. This paper aims to experimentally study the effect of the fillet radius on seismic performance of the connections with large welding defects. Four specimens with different sizes of fillet radii were loaded under quasi-static incremental cyclic loading, where different load-displacement relations and cracking behaviors were observed. The experimental results show that, as the size of the fillet radius increases, the seismic performance of the connections can be greatly improved.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.12989/scs.2012.12.5.44510.12989/scs.2012.12.5.445 ↗
2. Can. J. Civ. Eng. · 1996 · 23 · 67810.1139/l96-883 ↗
3. Steel Compos. Struct. · 2012 · 12 · 26110.12989/scs.2012.12.3.261 ↗
4. 10.12989/scs.2012.13.1.03510.12989/scs.2012.13.1.035 ↗
5. J. Earthq. Tsunami · 2011 · 5 · 110.1142/S1793431111001029 ↗
6. J. Earthq. Eng. · 2012 · 16 · 62310.1080/13632469.2012.676231 ↗
7. J. Struct. Eng. · 2007 · 53A · 493
8. J. Struct. Mech. Earthq. Eng. · 2007 · 24 · 13s10.2208/jsceseee.24.13s ↗
9. J. Bridge Eng. · 2013 · 18 · 85810.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000429 ↗
10. 10.12989/scs.2011.11.1.07710.12989/scs.2011.11.1.077 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000084810.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000848 ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000094410.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000944 ↗
13. 10.12989/scs.2014.17.5.68710.12989/scs.2014.17.5.687 ↗
14. J. Earthq. Eng. · 2013 · 17 · 32310.1080/13632469.2012.746211 ↗
15. 10.12989/scs.2011.11.1.02110.12989/scs.2011.11.1.021 ↗
16. 10.12989/scs.2012.13.4.38310.12989/scs.2012.13.4.383 ↗
17. Steel Compos. Struct. · 2011 · 11 · 29110.12989/scs.2011.11.4.291 ↗
18. J. Bridge Eng. · 2001 · 6 · 11010.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:2(110) ↗
19. Steel Struct. · 2005 · 5 · 133
20. Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J. · 2012 · 12 · 24910.12989/scs.2012.12.3.249 ↗
21. Thin-walled Struct. · 2002 · 40 · 18310.1016/S0263-8231(01)00059-3 ↗
22. 10.12989/scs.2014.16.1.00110.12989/scs.2014.16.1.001 ↗